Literature DB >> 33708554

Can the height of the parotid tumor be a predictor of malignancy?

Gene Huh1, Jae-Cheul Ahn2, Wonjae Cha1, Woo-Jin Jeong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malignancy in the parotid gland before surgery is often challenging. Various clues should be used to increase the index of suspicion for malignancy. We hypothesized that malignant lesions of the parotid gland are located at the superior part of the gland compared to benign ones.
METHODS: A total of 169 consecutive patients were included in this study whose medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Benign and malignant tumors were compared in size, height difference from five anatomical landmarks: hard palate, mastoid tip, earlobe, condylar head, and mandibular notch. The cutoff heights from significant landmarks (hard palate, condylar head) were estimated with ROC analysis and chi-square test.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (17.2%) were diagnosed with malignant and 140 patients (82.8%) as benign. The height differed significantly between benign and malignant tumors when the reference point was set for the hard palate (P=0.024) and the condylar head (P=0.049), with the cutoff height from reference points to be 22.5, 51.5 mm, respectively. Diagnostic values of parotid level difference presented higher sensitivity (75.9% for hard palate, 72.4% for condylar head vs. 47.8% for fine needle aspiration cytology) and lower false negative rate (24.1% for hard palate, 27.6% for condylar head vs. 52.2% for fine needle aspiration cytology) compared to fine needle aspiration cytology.
CONCLUSIONS: Malignant tumors of the parotid gland tend to locate at the superior part of the gland compared to benign tumors. Parotid tumors lying cephalad should raise an index of suspicion for malignancy. Height of the tumor in the parotid gland should be deliberately considered during the first encounter of the patient, which in turn could curate the next step in the diagnostic approach and treatment planning. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parotid neoplasm; physical examination; routine diagnostic test

Year:  2021        PMID: 33708554      PMCID: PMC7944051          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of parotid tumors.

Authors:  Mehmet Koyuncu; Teoman Seşen; Hüseyin Akan; Ahmet A Ismailoglu; Yücel Tanyeri; Atilla Tekat; Recep Unal; Lütfi Incesu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Parotidectomy for benign parotid disease at a university teaching hospital: outcome of 963 operations.

Authors:  Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; J Peter Klussmann; Claus Wittekindt; Eberhard Stennert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for salivary gland lesions.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Brian J Hall; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement.

Authors:  Poornima Chandra; Poornima Govindaraju; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  Quantitative estimation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular jawbones in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.

Authors:  Arati S Panchbhai
Journal:  Spec Care Dentist       Date:  2012-11-20

Review 6.  Current update on established and novel biomarkers in salivary gland carcinoma pathology and the molecular pathways involved.

Authors:  Markus Stenner; J Peter Klussmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Delayed enhancement in differential diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasm.

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Alfredo Clemente; Matteo Renzulli; Nicola Maggialetti; Mario Santagata; Giuseppe Colella; Valerio Nardone; Rita Golfieri; Luca Brunese; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-09

8.  Salivary gland tumors: A 20-year review of clinical diagnostic accuracy at a single center.

Authors:  Wei-Han Lee; Te-Ming Tseng; Hsin-Te Hsu; Fei-Peng Lee; Shih-Han Hung; Po-Yueh Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Accuracy of Core Needle Biopsy Versus Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Diagnosing Salivary Gland Tumors.

Authors:  In Hye Song; Joon Seon Song; Chang Ohk Sung; Jong-Lyel Roh; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim; Jeong Hyun Lee; Jung Hwan Baek; Kyung-Ja Cho
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2015-03-12

10.  Determination of sexual dimorphism in humans by measurements of mandible on digital panoramic radiograph.

Authors:  V Sairam; M V Geethamalika; Praveen B Kumar; G Naresh; Gareema P Raju
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.