Literature DB >> 33708548

Treatment response correlation between primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a retrospective study based on real-world data.

Yu Wang1, Longfei Li2, Xiyao Liu3, Yihua Wang1, Zhenrong Tang1, Yinan Wu1, Yudi Jin1, Shengchun Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excellent response of the primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy may indicate a better axillary status in breast cancer. However, this treatment response correlation has not been investigated in Chinese breast cancer patients.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with neoadjuvant therapy were included in this retrospective study, conducted at a comprehensive breast cancer institution in China. Clinicopathological factors at baseline were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Furthermore, association rules analyses were used to investigate the correlation between the pathologic response of the primary tumor and that of the axillary lymph nodes based on such factors.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that breast pathologic response was influenced by tumor size, classification of regional lymph nodes, histological grade, progesterone receptor status, and Ki67 expression. The potential influencing factor for the pathologic response of the axilla was found to be regional lymph node classification. The findings from association rules analyses demonstrated that when a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast was achieved among patients with cT2N0 and hormone receptor-negative disease, the axilla response in these patients was also highly likely to be pCR (the likelihood for axilla pCR was more than 90%). However, cT3N1-2 patients hardly achieved pCR for both the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes (mean confidence, 0.9637). The clinicopathological factors accounting for the inconsistent response between the breast and the axilla were found to be hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, and low Ki67 expression.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a strong correlation between breast pCR and axilla pCR among patients with specific characteristics. These findings provide a basis for the selection of candidates for clinical trials on the omission of axillary surgery. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; axillary surgery; neoadjuvant therapy; quality of life (QOL)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33708548      PMCID: PMC7944072          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  18 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; Gunter von Minckwitz; Michael L Marinovich; Eleftherios Mamounas
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives 2006.

Authors:  M Kaufmann; G von Minckwitz; H D Bear; A Buzdar; P McGale; H Bonnefoi; M Colleoni; C Denkert; W Eiermann; R Jackesz; A Makris; W Miller; J-Y Pierga; V Semiglazov; A Schneeweiss; R Souchon; V Stearns; M Untch; S Loibl
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissection in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Andrea V Barrio; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee; George Plitas; Melissa Pilewskie; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Mary L Gemignani; Alexandra S Heerdt; Lisa M Sclafani; Virgilio Sacchini; Hiram S Cody; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Machine learning and data mining frameworks for predicting drug response in cancer: An overview and a novel in silico screening process based on association rule mining.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vougas; Theodore Sakellaropoulos; Athanassios Kotsinas; George-Romanos P Foukas; Andreas Ntargaras; Filippos Koinis; Alexander Polyzos; Vassilios Myrianthopoulos; Hua Zhou; Sonali Narang; Vassilis Georgoulias; Leonidas Alexopoulos; Iannis Aifantis; Paul A Townsend; Petros Sfikakis; Rebecca Fitzgerald; Dimitris Thanos; Jiri Bartek; Russell Petty; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Vassilis G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  Association of Low Nodal Positivity Rate Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive or Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Breast Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alison U Barron; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; E Shelley Hwang; Henry M Kuerer; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Massimo Cristofanilli; Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Thomas Buchholz; Funda Meric; Lavinia Middleton; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Michael Untch; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban D Costa; Holger Eidtmann; Peter A Fasching; Bernd Gerber; Wolfgang Eiermann; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens Huober; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Kaufmann; Gottfried E Konecny; Carsten Denkert; Valentina Nekljudova; Keyur Mehta; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: prevalence and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  Winkle Kwan; Jeremy Jackson; Lorna M Weir; Carol Dingee; Greg McGregor; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: historical perspective and current trials.

Authors:  Raquel F D van la Parra; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  2 in total

1.  Development of a novel nomogram-based online tool to predict axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN+ breast cancer: A multicentre study on 1,950 patients.

Authors:  Fabio Corsi; Sara Albasini; Luca Sorrentino; Giulia Armatura; Claudia Carolla; Corrado Chiappa; Francesca Combi; Annalisa Curcio; Angelica Della Valle; Guglielmo Ferrari; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Oreste Gentilini; Matteo Ghilli; Chiara Listorti; Stefano Mancini; Peter Marinello; Francesco Meani; Simone Mele; Anna Pertusati; Manuela Roncella; Francesca Rovera; Adele Sgarella; Giovanni Tazzioli; Daniela Tognali; Secondo Folli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Predicting dynamic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a novel metabolomics approach.

Authors:  Caridad Díaz; Carmen González-Olmedo; Leticia Díaz-Beltrán; José Camacho; Patricia Mena García; Ariadna Martín-Blázquez; Mónica Fernández-Navarro; Ana Laura Ortega-Granados; Fernando Gálvez-Montosa; Juan Antonio Marchal; Francisca Vicente; José Pérez Del Palacio; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.449

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.