Literature DB >> 33707807

A Study of Reliance Agreement Templates Used by U.S. Research Institutions.

David B Resnik1, Juliet Taylor2, Kathryn Morris3, Min Shi1.   

Abstract

We performed a content analysis of reliance agreement templates from 73 of the top U.S. research institutions ranked by research funding. 67.1% of institutions in our sample use the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) template and 8.2% use the SMART IRB template. Although a significant percentage of institutions (45.2%) use their own custom template, many of these also use the OHRP template or the SMART IRB template. 21.9% of institutional templates have only the OHRP minimum 10 contractual provisions (or elements), 27.4% have 11 elements, 26% have 12-19 elements, and 24.7% have 20 or more elements. 5.5% of institutional templates require the relied-upon institution to indemnify the relying institution, 6.8% require the relying institution to indemnify the relied-upon institution, 8.2% require the relied-upon institution to have liability insurance, 15.1% require the relying institution to have liability insurance, 2.7% require the relied-upon institution to have accreditation, and none require the relying institution to have accreditation. The number of elements in the template was positively associated with total research funding and private institutional control. Our data indicate that institutions which are seeking reliance agreements for cooperative research involving human subjects are not likely to encounter many difficulties because most are using commonly employed templates and are not imposing potentially disputable requirements on parties to the agreement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cooperative research; human subjects; legal liability; reliance agreements; templates

Year:  2018        PMID: 33707807      PMCID: PMC7946149          DOI: 10.1002/eahr.403002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IRB        ISSN: 0193-7758


  10 in total

Review 1.  Liability for institutional review boards: from regulation to litigation.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  2004-06

2.  The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.

Authors:  Jerry Menikoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?

Authors:  Greg Koski; Jessica Aungst; Joel Kupersmith; Kenneth Getz; David Rimoin
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 May-Jun

4.  Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.

Authors:  Lee A Green; Julie C Lowery; Christine P Kowalski; Leon Wyszewianski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Single-Minded Research Review: The Common Rule and Single IRB Policy.

Authors:  Carrie D Wolinetz; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 6.  Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.

Authors:  George Silberman; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-19

8.  Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: local costs without local context.

Authors:  Bernard Ravina; Lisa Deuel; Andrew Siderowf; E Ray Dorsey
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  How variability in the institutional review board review process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research.

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Kate Simpson; Richard Sorelle; Tracy Urech; Supicha Sookanan Chitwood
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Ekaterina Pivovarova; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.