Literature DB >> 20225291

Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: local costs without local context.

Bernard Ravina1, Lisa Deuel, Andrew Siderowf, E Ray Dorsey.   

Abstract

Multicenter clinical research involves parallel Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews based on the premise that local review reflects aspects of the research environment. We examined the costs and effects of local IRB review of the consent and protocol in a multicenter clinical trial in Parkinson disease. Seventy-six percent of changes to the consent reflected standard institutional language, with no substantive changes to the protocol. The costs of this process exceeded $100,000. These findings support initiatives by the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to facilitate centralized reviews. This may be an opportune time for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) to adopt a central review model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20225291      PMCID: PMC2848288          DOI: 10.1002/ana.21831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  12 in total

1.  A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials.

Authors:  Michaele C Christian; Jacquelyn L Goldberg; Jack Killen; Jeffrey S Abrams; Mary S McCabe; Joan K Mauer; Robert E Wittes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Ronald W Hansen; Henry G Grabowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Holly A Taylor; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The cost of institutional review boards in academic medical centers.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman; Kenneth Getz; Jeanne L Speckman; Margaret M Byrne; Jason Gerson; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical trials: rising costs limit innovation.

Authors:  S Claiborne Johnston; Stephen L Hauser
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Coast IRB hits treacherous waters.

Authors:  Alan Dove
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Regulatory challenges: lessons from recent West Nile virus trials in the United States.

Authors:  Penelope M Jester; Samuel J Tilden; Yufeng Li; Richard J Whitley; Wayne M Sullender
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Regulatory approvals in a large multinational clinical trial: the ESPRIT experience.

Authors:  Laura A McNay; Jorge A Tavel; Karen Oseekey; Cathy M McDermott; David Mollerup; Judith D Bebchuk
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-02

9.  Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards.

Authors:  W J Burman; R R Reves; D L Cohn; R T Schooley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.

Authors:  Raphael Saginur; Susan F Dent; Lisa Schwartz; Ronald Heslegrave; Sid Stacey; Janet Manzo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  18 in total

1.  Ethics and privacy issues of a practice-based surveillance system: need for a national-level institutional research ethics board and consent standards.

Authors:  Jyoti A Kotecha; Donna Manca; Anita Lambert-Lanning; Karim Keshavjee; Neil Drummond; Marshall Godwin; Michelle Greiver; Wayne Putnam; Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Richard Birtwhistle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Understanding the global epidemiology of pediatric critical illness: the power, pitfalls, and practicalities of point prevalence studies.

Authors:  Scott L Weiss; Julie C Fitzgerald; Edward Vincent Faustino; Marino S Festa; Ericka L Fink; Philippe Jouvet; Jenny L Bush; Niranjan Kissoon; John Marshall; Vinay M Nadkarni; Neal J Thomas
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Expanding research to provide an evidence base for nutritional interventions for the management of inborn errors of metabolism.

Authors:  Kathryn M Camp; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Lynne Yao; Stephen C Groft; Melissa A Parisi; Andrew Mulberg; Rashmi Gopal-Srivastava; Stephen Cederbaum; Gregory M Enns; Abby G Ershow; Dianne M Frazier; John Gohagan; Cary Harding; R Rodney Howell; Karen Regan; Peter W Stacpoole; Charles Venditti; Jerry Vockley; Michael Watson; Paul M Coates
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.797

4.  A Study of Reliance Agreement Templates Used by U.S. Research Institutions.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Juliet Taylor; Kathryn Morris; Min Shi
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 5.  Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.

Authors:  George Silberman; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 6.  Analysis of start-up, retention, and adherence in ALS clinical trials.

Authors:  Nazem Atassi; Padmaja Yerramilli-Rao; Jackie Szymonifka; Hong Yu; Marianne Kearney; Daniela Grasso; Jing Deng; Mark Levine-Weinberg; Jordan Shapiro; Alexandra Lee; Lucia Joseph; Eric A Macklin; Merit E Cudkowicz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Feasibility of Virtual Research Visits in Fox Trial Finder.

Authors:  E Ray Dorsey; Joseph D Wagner; Michael T Bull; Ashley Rizzieri; Justin Grischkan; Meredith A Achey; Todd Sherer; Sohini Chowdhury; Claire Meunier; Lily Cappelletti; Charlotte Rocker; Irene H Richard; Heidi Schwarz; Gail Kang; Stacy H Ahmad; Rachel A Biemiller; Kevin M Biglan
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  A practical approach to remote longitudinal follow-up of Parkinson's disease: the FOUND study.

Authors:  Caroline M Tanner; Cheryl C Meng; Bernard Ravina; Anthony Lang; Roger Kurlan; Kenneth Marek; David Oakes; John Seibyl; Emily Flagg; Lisa Gauger; Dolores D Guest; Christopher G Goetz; Karl Kieburtz; Diane DiEuliis; Stanley Fahn; Robin A Elliott; Ira Shoulson
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 9.  Meeting the Challenge: The National Cancer Institute's Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research.

Authors:  Holly A Massett; Sharon L Hampp; Jacquelyn L Goldberg; Margaret Mooney; Linda K Parreco; Lori Minasian; Mike Montello; Grace E Mishkin; Catasha Davis; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers.

Authors:  E Ray Dorsey; Meredith A Achey; Christopher A Beck; Denise B Beran; Kevin M Biglan; Cynthia M Boyd; Peter N Schmidt; Richard Simone; Allison W Willis; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Maya Katz; Caroline M Tanner; Kristen Dodenhoff; Nathan Ziman; Jason Aldred; Julie Carter; Joohi Jimenez-Shahed; Christine Hunter; Meredith Spindler; Zoltan Mari; John C Morgan; Dedi McLane; Patrick Hickey; Lisa Gauger; Irene Hegeman Richard; Michael T Bull; Nicte I Mejia; Grace Bwala; Martha Nance; Ludy Shih; Lauren Anderson; Carlos Singer; Cindy Zadikoff; Natalia Okon; Andrew Feigin; Jean Ayan; Christina Vaughan; Rajesh Pahwa; Jessica Cooper; Sydney Webb; Rohit Dhall; Anhar Hassan; Delana Weis; Steven DeMello; Sara S Riggare; Paul Wicks; Joseph Smith; H Tait Keenan; Ryan Korn; Heidi Schwarz; Saloni Sharma; E Anna Stevenson; William Zhu
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.536

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.