Literature DB >> 33705476

Belief in sexism shift: Defining a new form of contemporary sexism and introducing the belief in sexism shift scale (BSS scale).

Miriam K Zehnter1, Francesca Manzi2, Patrick E Shrout3, Madeline E Heilman3.   

Abstract

The belief that the target of sexism has shifted from women to men is gaining popularity. Yet despite its potential theoretical and practical importance, the belief that men are now the primary target of sexism has not been systematically defined nor has it been reliably measured. In this paper, we define the belief in sexism shift (BSS) and introduce a scale to measure it. We contend that BSS constitutes a new form of contemporary sexism characterized by the perception that anti-male discrimination is pervasive, that it now exceeds anti-female discrimination, and that it is caused by women's societal advancement. In four studies (N = 666), we develop and test a concise, one-dimensional, 15-item measure of BSS: the BSS scale. Our findings demonstrate that BSS is related to, yet distinct from other forms of sexism (traditional, modern, and ambivalent sexism). Moreover, our results show that the BSS scale is a stable and reliable measure of BSS across different samples, time, and participant gender. The BSS scale is also less susceptible to social desirability concerns than other sexism measures. In sum, the BSS scale can be a valuable tool to help understand a new and potentially growing type of sexism that may hinder women in unprecedented ways.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33705476      PMCID: PMC7951888          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  13 in total

1.  Identifying careless responses in survey data.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; S Bartholomew Craig
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-04-16

2.  Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: implications for perceptions of anti-White bias.

Authors:  Clara L Wilkins; Cheryl R Kaiser
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-16

Review 3.  Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing.

Authors:  Michael I Norton; Samuel R Sommers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

4.  Inferences about competing measures based on patterns of binary significance tests are questionable.

Authors:  Patrick E Shrout; Marika Yip-Bannicq
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Reversed item bias: an integrative model.

Authors:  Bert Weijters; Hans Baumgartner; Niels Schillewaert
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-05-06

6.  Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.

Authors:  Diane L Putnick; Marc H Bornstein
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations.

Authors:  Birk Diedenhofen; Jochen Musch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.

Authors:  Diana C Mutz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Are the Processes Underlying Discrimination the Same for Women and Men? A Critical Review of Congruity Models of Gender Discrimination.

Authors:  Francesca Manzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-03-06

10.  Women Quotas vs. Men Quotas in Academia: Students Perceive Favoring Women as Less Fair Than Favoring Men.

Authors:  Miriam K Zehnter; Erich Kirchler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.