Importance: The presence of atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging can support the diagnosis of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but reproducible measurements are lacking. Objective: To assess the diagnostic and prognostic utility of 6 visual atrophy scales (VAS) and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic/prognostic study, data from 235 patients with bvFTD and 225 age- and magnetic resonance imaging-matched control individuals from 3 centers were collected from December 1, 1998, to September 30, 2019. One hundred twenty-one participants with bvFTD had high confidence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) (bvFTD-HC), and 19 had low confidence of FTLD (bvFTD-LC). Blinded clinicians applied 6 previously validated VAS, and the MRPI was calculated with a fully automated approach. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were also measured for comparison. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of this study were bvFTD-HC or a neuropathological diagnosis of 4-repeat (4R) tauopathy and the clinical deterioration rate (assessed by longitudinal measurements of Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes). Measures of cerebral atrophy included VAS scores, the bvFTD atrophy score (sum of VAS scores in orbitofrontal, anterior cingulate, anterior temporal, medial temporal lobe, and frontal insula regions), the MRPI, and other computerized quantifications of cortical and subcortical volumes. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated for the differentiation of participants with bvFTD-HC and bvFTD-LC and controls. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the ability of atrophy measures to estimate longitudinal clinical deterioration. Results: Of the 460 included participants, 296 (64.3%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (11.4) years. The accuracy of the bvFTD atrophy score for the differentiation of bvFTD-HC from controls (AUROC, 0.930; 95% CI, 0.903-0.957) and bvFTD-HC from bvFTD-LC (AUROC, 0.880; 95% CI, 0.787-0.972) was comparable to computerized measures (AUROC, 0.973 [95% CI, 0.954-0.993] and 0.898 [95% CI, 0.834-0.962], respectively). The MRPI was increased in patients with bvFTD and underlying 4R tauopathies compared with other FTLD subtypes (14.1 [2.0] vs 11.2 [2.6] points; P < .001). Higher bvFTD atrophy scores were associated with faster clinical deterioration in bvFTD (1.86-point change in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes score per bvFTD atrophy score increase per year; 95% CI, 0.99-2.73; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Based on these study findings, in bvFTD, VAS increased the diagnostic certainty of underlying FTLD, and the MRPI showed potential for the detection of participants with underlying 4R tauopathies. These widely available measures of atrophy can also be useful to estimate longitudinal clinical deterioration.
Importance: The presence of atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging can support the diagnosis of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but reproducible measurements are lacking. Objective: To assess the diagnostic and prognostic utility of 6 visual atrophy scales (VAS) and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic/prognostic study, data from 235 patients with bvFTD and 225 age- and magnetic resonance imaging-matched control individuals from 3 centers were collected from December 1, 1998, to September 30, 2019. One hundred twenty-one participants with bvFTD had high confidence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) (bvFTD-HC), and 19 had low confidence of FTLD (bvFTD-LC). Blinded clinicians applied 6 previously validated VAS, and the MRPI was calculated with a fully automated approach. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were also measured for comparison. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of this study were bvFTD-HC or a neuropathological diagnosis of 4-repeat (4R) tauopathy and the clinical deterioration rate (assessed by longitudinal measurements of Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes). Measures of cerebral atrophy included VAS scores, the bvFTD atrophy score (sum of VAS scores in orbitofrontal, anterior cingulate, anterior temporal, medial temporal lobe, and frontal insula regions), the MRPI, and other computerized quantifications of cortical and subcortical volumes. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated for the differentiation of participants with bvFTD-HC and bvFTD-LC and controls. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the ability of atrophy measures to estimate longitudinal clinical deterioration. Results: Of the 460 included participants, 296 (64.3%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (11.4) years. The accuracy of the bvFTD atrophy score for the differentiation of bvFTD-HC from controls (AUROC, 0.930; 95% CI, 0.903-0.957) and bvFTD-HC from bvFTD-LC (AUROC, 0.880; 95% CI, 0.787-0.972) was comparable to computerized measures (AUROC, 0.973 [95% CI, 0.954-0.993] and 0.898 [95% CI, 0.834-0.962], respectively). The MRPI was increased in patients with bvFTD and underlying 4R tauopathies compared with other FTLD subtypes (14.1 [2.0] vs 11.2 [2.6] points; P < .001). Higher bvFTD atrophy scores were associated with faster clinical deterioration in bvFTD (1.86-point change in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes score per bvFTD atrophy score increase per year; 95% CI, 0.99-2.73; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Based on these study findings, in bvFTD, VAS increased the diagnostic certainty of underlying FTLD, and the MRPI showed potential for the detection of participants with underlying 4R tauopathies. These widely available measures of atrophy can also be useful to estimate longitudinal clinical deterioration.
Authors: Mircea Balasa; Ellen Gelpi; Idaira Martín; Anna Antonell; Ma Jesus Rey; Oriol Grau-Rivera; José Luis Molinuevo; Raquel Sánchez-Valle; Albert Lladó Journal: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 8.090
Authors: F T Gossink; A Dols; C J Kerssens; W A Krudop; B J Kerklaan; Ph Scheltens; M L Stek; Y A L Pijnenburg Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Tiffany W Chow; Malcolm A Binns; Morris Freedman; Donald T Stuss; Joel Ramirez; Chris J M Scott; Sandra Black Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2008 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: David C Perry; Jesse A Brown; Katherine L Possin; Samir Datta; Andrew Trujillo; Anneliese Radke; Anna Karydas; John Kornak; Ana C Sias; Gil D Rabinovici; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Adam L Boxer; Mary De May; Katherine P Rankin; Virginia E Sturm; Suzee E Lee; Brandy R Matthews; Aimee W Kao; Keith A Vossel; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Zachary A Miller; Sang Won Seo; Manu Sidhu; Stephanie E Gaus; Alissa L Nana; Jose Norberto S Vargas; Ji-Hye L Hwang; Rik Ossenkoppele; Alainna B Brown; Eric J Huang; Giovanni Coppola; Howard J Rosen; Daniel Geschwind; John Q Trojanowski; Lea T Grinberg; Joel H Kramer; Bruce L Miller; William W Seeley Journal: Brain Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Katya Rascovsky; John R Hodges; David Knopman; Mario F Mendez; Joel H Kramer; John Neuhaus; John C van Swieten; Harro Seelaar; Elise G P Dopper; Chiadi U Onyike; Argye E Hillis; Keith A Josephs; Bradley F Boeve; Andrew Kertesz; William W Seeley; Katherine P Rankin; Julene K Johnson; Maria-Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Howard Rosen; Caroline E Prioleau-Latham; Albert Lee; Christopher M Kipps; Patricia Lillo; Olivier Piguet; Jonathan D Rohrer; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon; Sandra E Black; Marsel Mesulam; Sandra Weintraub; Brad C Dickerson; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Florence Pasquier; Vincent Deramecourt; Florence Lebert; Yolande Pijnenburg; Tiffany W Chow; Facundo Manes; Jordan Grafman; Stefano F Cappa; Morris Freedman; Murray Grossman; Bruce L Miller Journal: Brain Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Christopher G Schwarz; Jeffrey L Gunter; Heather J Wiste; Scott A Przybelski; Stephen D Weigand; Chadwick P Ward; Matthew L Senjem; Prashanthi Vemuri; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Joseph E Parisi; Kejal Kantarci; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Christopher M Kipps; R Rhys Davies; Joanna Mitchell; Jillian J Kril; Glenda M Halliday; John R Hodges Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Ignacio Illán-Gala; Salvatore Nigro; Lawren VandeVrede; Neus Falgàs; Hilary W Heuer; Cèlia Painous; Yaroslau Compta; Maria J Martí; Victor Montal; Javier Pagonabarraga; Jaime Kulisevsky; Alberto Lleó; Juan Fortea; Giancarlo Logroscino; Andrea Quattrone; Aldo Quattrone; David C Perry; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Howard J Rosen; Lea T Grinberg; Salvatore Spina; Renaud La Joie; Gil D Rabinovici; Bruce L Miller; Julio C Rojas; William W Seeley; Adam L Boxer Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Andrea Quattrone; Maurizio Morelli; Maria G Bianco; Jolanda Buonocore; Alessia Sarica; Maria Eugenia Caligiuri; Federica Aracri; Camilla Calomino; Marida De Maria; Maria Grazia Vaccaro; Vera Gramigna; Antonio Augimeri; Basilio Vescio; Aldo Quattrone Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-07-20
Authors: Yuan Fang; Margaret F Doyle; Jiachen Chen; Michael L Alosco; Jesse Mez; Claudia L Satizabal; Wei Qiao Qiu; Joanne M Murabito; Kathryn L Lunetta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: David Reyes-Leiva; Oriol Dols-Icardo; Sonia Sirisi; Elena Cortés-Vicente; Janina Turon-Sans; Noemi de Luna; Rafael Blesa; Olivia Belbin; Victor Montal; Daniel Alcolea; Juan Fortea; Alberto Lleó; Ricard Rojas-García; Ignacio Illán-Gala Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 4.003