F T Gossink1, A Dols1, C J Kerssens2, W A Krudop3, B J Kerklaan4, Ph Scheltens3, M L Stek2, Y A L Pijnenburg1. 1. Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZinGeest/VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZinGeest/VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital Amsterdam and Zaans Medical Centre Zaandam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The frontotemporal dementia (FTD) consortium criteria (2011) emphasise the importance of distinguishing possible and probable behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD). A significant number of possible patients with bvFTD do not show functional decline and remain with normal neuroimaging over time, thus exhibiting the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome. A neurodegenerative nature is unlikely but an alternative explanation is missing. Our aim was to detect psychiatric conditions underlying the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome after extensive evaluation. METHODS: We included patients with the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome whereby patients with probable bvFTD served as a control group. Patients had to have undergone both neurological and psychiatric evaluation. Their charts were reviewed retrospectively. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, psychiatric and psychological conditions associated with the clinical syndrome were determined in both groups and their relative frequencies were compared. RESULTS: Of 181 suspected bvFTD cases, 33 patients with bvFTD phenocopy syndrome and 19 with probable bvFTD were included. Recent life events, relationship problems and cluster C personality traits were the most prevalent psychiatric/psychological conditions. The frequency of these conditions was higher in the group of patients with the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome (n=28) compared to the probable bvFTD group (n=9) (χ(2) p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study thoroughly exploring psychiatric causes of the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome, revealing that in most cases multiple factors played a contributory role. Our study gives arguments for neurological and psychiatric collaboration when diagnosing bvFTD. Prompt diagnosis of treatable psychiatric conditions is to be gained. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
INTRODUCTION: The frontotemporal dementia (FTD) consortium criteria (2011) emphasise the importance of distinguishing possible and probable behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD). A significant number of possible patients with bvFTD do not show functional decline and remain with normal neuroimaging over time, thus exhibiting the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome. A neurodegenerative nature is unlikely but an alternative explanation is missing. Our aim was to detect psychiatric conditions underlying the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome after extensive evaluation. METHODS: We included patients with the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome whereby patients with probable bvFTD served as a control group. Patients had to have undergone both neurological and psychiatric evaluation. Their charts were reviewed retrospectively. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, psychiatric and psychological conditions associated with the clinical syndrome were determined in both groups and their relative frequencies were compared. RESULTS: Of 181 suspected bvFTD cases, 33 patients with bvFTD phenocopy syndrome and 19 with probable bvFTD were included. Recent life events, relationship problems and cluster C personality traits were the most prevalent psychiatric/psychological conditions. The frequency of these conditions was higher in the group of patients with the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome (n=28) compared to the probable bvFTD group (n=9) (χ(2) p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study thoroughly exploring psychiatric causes of the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome, revealing that in most cases multiple factors played a contributory role. Our study gives arguments for neurological and psychiatric collaboration when diagnosing bvFTD. Prompt diagnosis of treatable psychiatric conditions is to be gained. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Ignacio Illán-Gala; Victor Montal; Sergi Borrego-Écija; Eduard Vilaplana; Jordi Pegueroles; Daniel Alcolea; Belén Sánchez-Saudinós; Jordi Clarimón; Janina Turón-Sans; Nuria Bargalló; Sofía González-Ortiz; Howard J Rosen; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Bruce L Miller; Albert Lladó; Ricard Rojas-García; Rafael Blesa; Raquel Sánchez-Valle; Alberto Lleó; Juan Fortea Journal: Brain Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Felix Geser; Tibor C G Mitrovics; Johannes Haybaeck; Deniz Yilmazer-Hanke Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: E Devenney; T Swinn; E Mioshi; M Hornberger; K E Dawson; S Mead; J B Rowe; J R Hodges Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2018-04-28 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Simon Ducharme; Annemiek Dols; Robert Laforce; Emma Devenney; Fiona Kumfor; Jan van den Stock; Caroline Dallaire-Théroux; Harro Seelaar; Flora Gossink; Everard Vijverberg; Edward Huey; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Mario Masellis; Calvin Trieu; Chiadi Onyike; Paulo Caramelli; Leonardo Cruz de Souza; Alexander Santillo; Maria Landqvist Waldö; Ramon Landin-Romero; Olivier Piguet; Wendy Kelso; Dhamidhu Eratne; Dennis Velakoulis; Manabu Ikeda; David Perry; Peter Pressman; Bradley Boeve; Rik Vandenberghe; Mario Mendez; Carole Azuar; Richard Levy; Isabelle Le Ber; Sandra Baez; Alan Lerner; Ratnavalli Ellajosyula; Florence Pasquier; Daniela Galimberti; Elio Scarpini; John van Swieten; Michael Hornberger; Howard Rosen; John Hodges; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Yolande Pijnenburg Journal: Brain Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Rebecca M E Steketee; Rozanna Meijboom; Esther E Bron; Robert Jan Osse; Inge de Koning; Lize C Jiskoot; Stefan Klein; Frank Jan de Jong; Aad van der Lugt; John C van Swieten; Marion Smits Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-04-10 Impact factor: 4.881