Advances in vaccine delivery systems against viral infectious diseases.

Although vaccines are available for many infectious diseases, there are still unresolved infectious diseases that threaten global public health. In particular, the rapid spread of unpredictable, highly contagious viruses has recorded numerous infection cases and deaths, and has changed our lives socially or economically through social distancing and wearing masks. The pandemics of unpredictable, highly contagious viruses increase the ever-high social need for rapid vaccine development. Nanotechnologies may hold promise and expedite the development of vaccines against newly emerging infectious viruses. As potential nanoplatforms for delivering antigens to immune cells, delivery systems based on lipids, polymers, proteins, and inorganic nanomaterials have been studied. These nanoplatforms have been tested as a means to deliver vaccines not as a whole, but in the form of protein subunits or as DNA or mRNA sequences encoding the antigen proteins of viruses. This review covers the current status of nanomaterial-based delivery systems for viral antigens, with highlights on nanovaccines against recently emerging infectious viruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and Zika virus.

Introduction

The recent outbreaks of various infectious diseases have emphasized the social need for the rapid development of vaccines. The continuous outbreaks of viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Ebola, and Zika have put the world in peril against infectious disease. In 2020, the unprecedently severe pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) greatly impacted social activities and the global economy [1]. From a social point of view, adequate intervention in advance and efforts to prevent the spread of disease are more efficient than developing follow-up therapeutics. From an economic perspective, the enormous cost and time spent treating a disease would be saved if vaccines were available to control the spread of viral infection [2]. In order to cope with outbreaks of new infectious diseases, we must become able to quickly develop vaccines [3].

Since the first smallpox vaccine was developed in 1798, conventional vaccinations have mostly relied on live attenuated or inactivated pathogens. A live attenuated vaccine exhibits reduced virulence of the pathogen under laboratory conditions, but the pathogen is still alive and the vaccine contains whole bacteria or viruses that are to be recognized by the human immune system [4]. An inactivated vaccine also includes the whole microorganism, but in this case, the pathogen has been killed by chemical or heat treatment [5]. These conventional vaccine types are generally effective, but they have the potential to raise safety concerns.

Several types of vaccines have been developed to overcome these safety issues and improve vaccine efficacy. To address the safety issues, researchers developed the subunit vaccine, which comprised a purified antigenic piece of the pathogen [6]. As the subunit vaccine does not contain whole pathogens, there is no risk of inducing infection; such vaccines are therefore much safer than previous types [7]. In addition, recombinant vaccines were developed as the next-generation vaccines to induce immunity against infections [8]. For effective immunogenicity, protein vaccines need to be endocytosed by antigen-presenting cells.

Recently, nucleic acid vaccines, such as DNA and RNA vaccines, have emerged [9]. Nucleic acid vaccines have attracted a great deal of attention because of their ability to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses [10]. Due to their ease of design and manufacturing and their good stability during storage, DNA vaccines offer advantages over traditional vaccines [11]. Similarly, RNA vaccines, which cause antigen proteins to be expressed in the cytoplasm, have attracted the interest of vaccine developers: they can induce potent immune response and can be more rapidly and easily manufactured compared with the conventional live-attenuated or killed vaccines [10, 12].

Despite having various advantages over conventional vaccines, nucleic acid vaccines suffer from low immunogenicity [13]. This major drawback of nucleic acid vaccines reflects their limited delivery to antigen-presenting cells (e.g., dendritic cells) and insufficient expression of target antigens. Thus, for nucleic acid vaccines to succeed, researchers should develop delivery systems that can enhance the uptake and expression of antigen-encoding nucleic acids at antigen-presenting cells.

To reach their full potential, vaccines should be delivered intact to the location at which they are intended to activate the immune system. In this regard, nanotechnology holds promise for the development of vaccine antigen delivery systems and immune-stimulating adjuvants [14]. This review will cover various vaccine delivery systems and the current status of nanotechnology-based vaccines for infectious diseases. As vaccine antigen types, subunit protein, DNA, and RNA vaccines will be highlighted. As vaccine nanocarriers, liposomes, polymeric micelles, self-assembled peptide, and proteins nanoparticles will be reviewed for each antigen type.

Nanotechnology for delivery of viral vaccines

Nanotechnology has been used to deliver various vaccine antigens, including DNA, RNA, and protein subunit vaccines via different routes. Using a proper administration route for vaccination is a critical factor that can impact vaccine efficacy and patient compliance. To induce desirable vaccine efficacy, the vaccine should be distributed from the administered site to suitable immune organs with high populations of antigen-presenting cells. As the types and extent of induced immune responses can differ according to the vaccine-administered site, routes of vaccination should be carefully considered. The types and administration routes of various nanotechnology-based vaccines are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Nanotechnologies used for delivery of vaccines against viral infectious diseases

Vaccine type	Target virus	Antigen	Formulation	Route	Animal model	Reference
Nucleic acid	HIV	HIV-1 Env encoding DNA	Mannosylated zwitterionic-based cationic liposome	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	15
	Influenza virus	H1N1 hemagglutinin encoding RNA	Mannosylated lipid nanoparticles	Intramuscular, intradermal	Balb/c mice	21
	Influenza virus	Influenza hemagglutinin encoding RNA	Lipid nanoparticle	Intradermal	Balb/c mice	20
	HIV	Anti-HIV-1 antibody encoding RNA	Lipid nanoparticle	Intravenous	Balb/c mice	26
	Influenza virus	H1N1 hemagglutinin encoding DNA	PLGA/PEI nanoparticles	Microneedle patch	Balb/c mice	16
	Influenza virus	Influenza hemagglutinin encoding RNA	Dendrimer nanoparticle	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	27
	Influenza virus	Influenza hemagglutinin encoding RNA	Poly(CBA-co-4-amino-1-butanol) polymer-based nanoparticles	Intramuscular, intradermal	Balb/c mice	28
	Influenza virus	Influenza hemagglutinin or nucleoprotein encoding RNA	Chitosan-based nanogel	Subcutaneous	Balb/c mice	29
	HIV	HIV-1 gag encoding RNA	Cationic nanomicelles based on PEI-stearic acid copolymer	Subcutaneous	Balb/c mice	30
	HIV	HIV-1 gag encoding RNA	PLA-cell penetrating peptide complex	-	-	31
	HIV	HIV-1 Env encoding DNA	Peptide-based nanofibrous hydrogels	Intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous	Balb/c mice	18
	HIV	HIV-1 Env encoding DNA	Surface-engineered gold nanorods	Intradermal	Balb/c mice	17
	HIV	HIV-1 Env encoding DNA	Virus-like fullerenol nanoparticles	Intradermal	Balb/c mice	19
Protein	Influenza virus	H1N1 nucleoprotein	Viral-mimetic polymeric nanoparticle	Intranasal	C57BL/6 mice	36
	Hepatitis B virus	Hepatitis B surface antigen	PLA modified with didodecyldimethylammonium bromide	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	37
	Influenza virus	Influenza matrix protein 2	Ferritin nanoparticle	Intranasal	Balb/c mice	38
	Influenza virus	Influenza matrix protein 2	Double-layered protein nanoparticles	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	39
	Influenza virus	Globular head domain of the hemagglutinin	P22 VLPs	Intratracheal	C57BL/6 mice	45
	Lassa mammarenavirus (LASV)	LASV envelope surface glycoprotein	Mammalian cell-derived VLPs	Intramuscular	Rabbit	46
	Influenza virus	Influenza A hemagglutinin peptides	Plant-derived VLPs	-	-	48
	Avian infectious bronchitis virus	Avian coronavirus spike protein	Gold nanoparticle	Intramuscular	BALB/c mice	50

Delivery systems for nucleic acid vaccines against viral infectious diseases

Cationic liposomes [15], polymeric nanoparticles [16], inorganic gold nanorods [17], peptide nanofibers [18], and carbon nanoparticles [19] have been studied for the delivery of DNA vaccines against viral infectious diseases. These delivery systems aimed to protect the DNA vaccines from enzymatic degradation in the extracellular environment, and to facilitate intracellular delivery. As viral vaccine antigens, DNA encoding human immunodeficiency virus 1 envelope (HIV-1 env) protein pg 145 and influenza virus H1N1 hemagglutinin have been delivered via various routes of administration. The examples of DNA delivery systems are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Delivery systems of nucleic acids encoding viral antigens. a Mannosylated zwitterionic lipid-based cationic liposomes. Adapted from [15]. b PEI polymeric nanoparticle-coated microneedle. Adapted from [16]. c Peptide nanofiber-based hydrogel. Adapted from [18]. d Fullerenol nanoparticles. Adapted from [19]. e Cationic polymer-modified gold nanorods. Adapted from [17]. f Dendrimer-based nanomaterials for RNA vaccine delivery. Adapted from [27]. g saRNA polyplexes with high molar mass pABOLs. Adapted from [28]. h PLA-based cationic peptides/mRNA nanocomplex. Adapted from [31]. i Co-polymer based cationic nanomicelles. Adapted from [30]

mRNA vaccines have several merits over DNA vaccines; for example, they carry no risk of integrating into the host genome and can induce transient antigen expression without causing genetic transformation [20]. From the perspective of intracellular transport to the target site, mRNA vaccines have one less physical barrier. Unlike DNA vaccines, which need to pass through the nuclear membrane and reach the nucleus to undergo transcription, mRNA vaccines need only to reach the cytoplasm, where they can meet ribosomes for translation. However, due to the low expression levels achieved by exogenous mRNA in the host cells, large mRNA doses are needed to achieve a therapeutic effect. Efficient delivery may reduce the dose of mRNA vaccine needed to exert immunogenicity.

For delivery of mRNA vaccines against viral diseases such as HIV and influenza virus, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, cell-penetrating peptides, and cationic polysaccharides have been investigated. As routes of administration, intramuscular, intradermal, and subcutaneous routes have been used. Examples of mRNA delivery systems are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Lipid-based systems for delivery of nucleic acid viral vaccines

Lipid-based systems have been intensively studied to enhance the cellular delivery of nucleic acid vaccines. Due to the amphiphilic characteristics of lipids with hydrophilic head groups and hydrophobic tails, lipids can self-assemble to form bilayer nanostructures like liposomes. In particular, positively charged lipids can form complexes with anionic nucleic acid via charge-charge interaction. The compositions of lipid components confer liposomes to carry versatile cargoes.

Mannosylated cationic liposomes have been studied for the delivery of DNA and RNA vaccines encoding viral antigens [15, 21]. Mannose receptors are known to be overexpressed on the surfaces of antigen-presenting cells [22]. Taking advantage of this mannose receptor overexpression, researchers have modified nanomaterials with mannose ligand. In one study, a pegylated lipid derivative of mannose was used to modify cancer cell membrane-coated poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles containing the toll-like receptor 7 agonist, imiquimod [23]. In the study, the cellular uptake of mannose containing nanoparticles by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells was enhanced compared with that of nanoparticles lacking mannose. In another study, mannose-modified alginate nanoparticles were used for the targeted delivery of ovalbumin to dendritic cells and inhibition of tumor growth in mice [24]. The intracellular uptake of mannose-modified nanoparticle-delivered ovalbumin by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells was 3-fold higher than that observed in the free ovalbumin-treated group.

Zwitterionic lipid (distearoyl phosphoethanolaminepolycarboxy-betaine)-modified cationic liposomes were designed for electrostatic complexation with a negatively charged HIV DNA vaccine encoding HIV-1 env [15]. Mannose-conjugated zwitterionic lipid was used as a component of cationic liposomes. In mice, intramuscular administration of the lipoplexes of mannose-modified cationic liposomes loaded with DNA encoding HIV-1 env was shown to provide higher immune responses compared to those seen in other groups, such as those receiving commercial Lipofectamine 2000-complexed DNA encoding HIV-1 env or a mixture of CpG adjuvant and DNA encoding HIV-1 env. The populations of HIV-specific T cells and the secretion levels of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ were highest in mice treated with the lipoplexes of mannose-modified cationic liposomes and DNA encoding HIV-1 env. The distribution of administered DNA vaccine to the lymph nodes was greater in the group treated with these lipoplexes compared to the other groups. Although this study showed that mannose modification could increase distribution to the lymph nodes, further studies should examine how mannose modification impacts endosomal escape to the cytoplasm and/or use a challenge model to examine the protection effect of the lipoplexes against HIV infection.

Another study used mannosylated cationic lipid nanoparticles to deliver self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) for influenza virus vaccination [21]. The saRNA was constructed by displacing the RNA sequence of viral structural proteins with that of the desired antigen. Through its self-amplification ability, saRNA is designed to increase the amounts of antigen expressed in the host cells [25]. In the study by Goswami and colleagues, an saRNA vaccine encoding influenza virus hemagglutinin was complexed to mannosylated cholesterol-containing cationic lipid nanoparticles. As a cationic lipid, 1,2-dilinoleyloxy-3-dimethylaminopropane was used as a component of the nanoparticle. Both intramuscular and intradermal administration of saRNA complexed with mannosylated cationic lipid nanoparticles were shown to provide greater hemagglutinin inhibitor titers, CD4+ T cell responses, and CD8+ T cells responses compared with that of the plain nanoparticle.

Cationic lipid nanoparticles were comprehensively studied for intramuscular and intradermal delivery of influenza virus hemagglutinin mRNA in three animal models [20]. Upon intramuscular or intradermal administration, the lipoplexes of cationic lipid nanoparticle with the mRNA induce potent hemagglutinin-specific antibody and CD4+ T cell responses in mice, rabbits, and ferrets. Notably, this study showed that the lipoplex of cationic lipid nanoparticles with hemagglutinin mRNA could protect mice from challenge with homologous and heterologous influenza H1N1 virus infection. In mice challenged with heterosubtype A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1 virus, vaccination with the lipoplex was found to provide survival for 14 days, whereas all mice receiving poly(C) RNA complexed with the cationic lipid nanoparticles died within this period.

Although most of the existing studies assessed nanocarriers for the delivery of DNA or mRNA encoding viral antigens, one recent study investigated cationic lipid nanoparticles for the delivery of an mRNA encoding a neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibody called VRCO1 [26]. In this study, the mRNA encoding VRCO1 was used to replace the costly development of a monoclonal neutralizing antibody. The ionizable cationic lipid, 2,2‐dilinoleyl‐4‐dimethylaminoethyl‐[1, 3]‐dioxolane, was used as a component of the lipid nanoparticles. Mice intravenously injected with 1.4 mg/kg of mRNA-cationic lipid nanoparticle complex showed a VRCO1 antibody production level of 70µg/mL in the plasma at 1 day post-dose. Moreover, a single dose (1.4 mg/kg) of mRNA lipoplexes was found to protect humanized mice from HIV-1 infection.

In summary, lipid-based systems can be applied to deliver wide range of nucleic acid vaccines including DNA plasmid, mRNA and saRNA. The use of target ligand-derivatives of lipids allows the liposomes to be used for specific immune cell-directed delivery systems. However, the candidate ligands for targeting specific immune cells are limited. It is challenging to identify ligand molecules which are exclusive markers of specific immune cells. With the cell biological and immunological progresses on specific markers of immune cells, the targeted delivery systems will be improved.

Polymer-based systems for delivery of nucleic acid viral vaccines

Among polymers, cationic polymers have been widely used for nucleic acid vaccine delivery. Similar to cationic liposomes, cationic polymers with positively charged groups can make complexes with nucleic acid vaccines based on charge-charge interaction. The resulting polyplexes are expected to increase the entry of nucleic acid vaccines into immune cells and enhance immune responses.

Cationic polymeric nanoparticles have been studied for the intradermal delivery of a DNA vaccine encoding the influenza H1N1 antigen [16]. The DNA encoding H1N1 antigen was complexed to poly lactic-co-glycolic acid/polyethyleneimine (PLGA/PEI) nanoparticles. Briefly, PLGA nanoparticles were prepared using W/O/W double emulsion-solvent evaporation. The negatively charged PLGA nanoparticles were coated with positively charged PEI to form PLGA/PEI complexes, which were further complexed with the DNA. The polyplexes were coated on polyvinylpyrrolidone microneedles using the layer-by-layer technique. In HEK293 cells, treatment with the polyplex yielded increased transfection of the DNA plasmid compared to that obtained using PEI polyplex. Intradermal vaccination with a patch of polyplex-coated microneedles yielded 2.2-fold higher H1N1-specific IgG titer levels compared with that obtained in mice that received intradermal injection with a patch of non-coated microneedles.

Dendrimers have also been used as a platform to deliver mRNA against Ebola virus and influenza H1N1 virus [27]. Modified poly(amido amine) dendrimer was complexed to a Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon RNA encoding the HA protein of H1N1 influenza virus or an RNA encoding Ebola virus glycoprotein. Notably, this study demonstrated that antigen proteins could be expressed in vivo after intramuscular administration of an mRNA platform. Upon influenza H1N1 virus challenge, 100% of mice immunized with H1N1 antigen-encoding mRNA in the dendrimer polyplex survived while all the mice treated with ovalbumin fragment-expressing mRNA in the dendrimer complex died after 7 days. Upon Ebola virus challenge, 100% protection was observed in the mice immunized with Ebola glycoprotein-encoding mRNA in dendrimer complexes, while control mice all died within 10 days.

The high-molecular-weight cationic polymer, poly(N,N′-cystaminebis(acrylamide)-co-4-amino-1-butanol), was used to deliver saRNA encoding hemagglutinin against influenza virus [28]. This study revealed that the molecular weight of the cationic polymer affected the transfection efficiency, with a 100-kDa polymer showing a higher efficiency than 5–92 kDa polymers. After intramuscular injection, the polyplex of saRNA and the 100-kDa cationic polymer showed 4-fold higher serum levels of hemagglutinin-specific IgG antibodies and neutralization titers compared to those obtained with the polyplex of saRNA with PEI, and provided complete protection from influenza virus challenge.

Another study used chitosan and alginate nanogel to deliver saRNA encoding hemagglutinin or nucleoprotein [29]. This nanogel was composed of chitosan cores formed by chitosan/tripolyphosphate and coated with alginate. The nanogel loaded with saRNA showed greater uptake by dendritic cells compared to naked saRNA. Three subcutaneous immunizations of mice with nanogel loaded with saRNA encoding hemagglutinin or nucleoprotein led to the induction of anti-hemagglutinin or anti-nucleoprotein antibodies. In a rabbit model, three subcutaneous immunizations triggered the development of antigen-specific IgG antibodies.

Cationic polymeric micelles have been studied for the subcutaneous delivery of mRNA encoding HIV-1 gag [30]. A hydrophobic stearic acid derivative of cationic branched PEI (m.w. 2 kDa) was self-assembled to form micelles that harbored cationic charges on their surfaces. The uptake of mRNA by the DC 2.4 dendritic cell line was enhanced after cationic micelle-based delivery compared to delivery with PEI polyplexes alone. Subcutaneous injection of mice with mRNA encoding HIV-1 gag in the cationic polymeric micelle complexes yielded higher serum levels of antigen-specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a compared with the groups treated with naked mRNA or mRNA in PEI polyplexes. The percentage of HIV gag-specific IFN-γ-positive cells was higher in the group immunized with mRNA in polymeric micelle complexes compared to those immunized with PEI-mRNA polyplexes.

Delivery of mRNA encoding HIV-1 gag was also studied using cationic cell-penetrating peptide and polylactide nanoparticles [31]. Polylactide nanoparticles were reported to biodegrade to lactic acid in vivo [32], and to be taken up by dendritic cells in vivo [33]. A cationic cell-penetrating peptide (LAH4-L1) was used to adsorb negatively charged mRNA onto the negative surfaces of polylactide nanoparticles. The triplex of mRNA, cationic cell-penetrating peptide, and polylactide nanoparticles was found to yield increased expression of HIV-gag protein in dendritic cells compared with naked mRNA. In this study, the triplex system was found to increase the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-6, IFN-α, and IFN-γ), indicating the activation of Th1-oriented immune responses.

In summary, various polymers such as PEI, poly(amido amine) dendrimer, poly(N,N′-cystaminebis(acrylamide)-co-4-amino-1-butanol) or chitosan have been studied for nucleic acid vaccine development. Compared with the cationic liposomes, cationic polymers have advantages of less manufacturing processes. Unlike liposomes which need to go through the self-assembly nanoparticle process, extrusion, and complexation processes, polymers need the mixing process with the nucleic acid vaccines. However, polymeric delivery systems confront the biodegradation issues. The list of biocompatible and biodegradable polymers for nucleic acid delivery systems need to be extended in the future.

Other nucleic acid vaccine delivery systems

Compared to the number studies that have tested lipid or polymer-based nanomaterials, far fewer studies have tested other materials. Several alternative materials have been tested for the delivery of DNA against HIV infection, including peptide nanofibers [18], inorganic gold nanorods [17], and carbon-based nanomaterials [19]. As routes of administration, the intramuscular, intradermal, and subcutaneous routes were studied.

Peptide nanofibers were used to deliver DNA encoding HIV-1 env protein pg 145 [18]. This study exploited the self-assembly of naphthalene acetic acid-GFFY-NMe peptide to nanofiber. The nanofibers of naphthalene acetic acid-GFFY-NMe formed a hydrogel in an aqueous solution, and DNA encoding HIV-1 env was loaded to the hydrogel through interaction with the peptide nanofiber. In this study, the intramuscular, intradermal, and subcutaneous administration routes were studied. In all three routes, DNA-entrapped nanofibrous hydrogel yielded increased cellular and humoral immunity compared with naked plasmid DNA and the polyplexes of DNA with PEI.

Surface-engineered gold nanorods have been reported for the intradermal delivery of a DNA vaccine against HIV infection [17]. For complexation with DNA encoding HIV-1 env, cationic gold nanorods were formulated. As cationic molecules, poly (diallydimethylammonium chloride), PEI, or cetyltrimethylammonium bromide were tested for their ability to confer a cationic feature on the surfaces of the gold nanorods. Compared with the cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-coated nanorods, poly (diallydimethylammonium chloride)-coated nanorods or PEI-coated nanorods showed lower toxicity to HEK293 cells with higher transfection efficiency. Both poly (diallydimethylammonium chloride)-coated nanorods and PEI-coated nanorods were shown to induce maturation of dendritic cells and enhance cellular and humoral immune responses relative to the groups treated with naked plasmid DNA encoding HIV-1 env or with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-coated nanorods as a carrier.

A carbon-based fullerenol nanoparticle was investigated for intradermal delivery of DNA encoding HIV-1 env [19]. Fullerenol is a polyhydroxylated fullerene C60 derivative that can form nano-aggregates in aqueous solution. In this study, fullerenol nanoparticles were used to mimic the virus-like three-dimensional morphology for DNA vaccine delivery system. DNA encoding HIV-1 env was complexed to fullerenol nanoparticle by hydrogen bonding, and intradermally administered to mice. A greater HIV-1 env-specific antibody IgG titer was observed in the group treated with DNA in fullerenol nanoparticle complexes compared to the naked DNA treatment group. Moreover, vaccination with fullerenol-DNA antigen complexes (0.5 mg/kg DNA) induced stronger cellular immune responses compared to naked DNA vaccination (0.5 mg/kg) when both were applied as three injections given at 2-week intervals.

When developing delivery systems for nucleic acid vaccine antigens, researchers should validate the intracellular and in vivo antigen expression levels and characterize the physicochemical features, including the loading efficiencies and size of the antigen-encoding nucleic acids in complex with the delivery system. In terms of safety concerns, researchers should study the time-dependent pharmacokinetics and distribution of antigen-encoding nucleic acids to various organs of the body.

Delivery systems for protein vaccines against viral infectious diseases

Compared with traditional live-attenuated vaccine approaches, protein vaccines offer a major benefit in their improved safety. Because they involve highly purified recombinant antigen proteins, such vaccines can provide safer vaccination due to lack of impurities. Moreover, the use of a protein subunit vaccine can avoid the concerns surrounding the use of a live-attenuated vaccine, which can show complicated reversion to a pathogenic virus in immunocompromised patients [34]. However, soluble protein antigens are easily degraded in vivo and exhibit limited cellular entry with subsequent low immunogenicity [35]. Thus, various nanoparticle delivery systems have been investigated as protein antigen vaccine platforms to support efficient antigen uptake and promote antigen presentation. Examples of protein vaccines are illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Delivery systems of protein- and VLP-based vaccines against viral infectious diseases. a The 3M2e-rHF fusion protein and 3M2e-rHF fusion protein-based nanoparticle. Reprinted with permission from [38]. b Double-layered protein nanoparticles for protein antigen delivery. Reprinted with permission from [39]. c Schematic illustration of the expression and in vivo assembly of P22-SpyTag and preparation of P22-HAhead. Reprinted with permission from [45]. d Schematic illustration of preparation of an avian coronavirus VLP. Reprinted with permission from [50]

Polymeric systems for delivery of protein viral vaccines

To facilitate the entry of protein vaccines into immune cells, various polymers have been investigated. Polymers have been chemically conjugated or modified with functional groups to carry protein antigens. Functional modifications have been approached to provide pH-responsiveness for lysosomal escape, or noncovalent specific loading of protein antigens.

Virus-mimetic polymeric nanoparticles have been studied for influenza A virus nucleoprotein delivery [36]. To mimic the ability of the virus to escape endosomes, researchers introduced to the polymeric nanoparticle a pH-responsive moiety that can increase the endosomal escape of an antigen to the cytoplasm. To provide pH responsiveness, a two-block copolymer was designed: one block was hydrophilic dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and pyridyl disulfide ethyl methacrylate; the other block, which was the pH-sensitive part, was composed of propylacrylic acid, butylmethacrylate, and dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate. Influenza A H1N1 nucleoprotein was conjugated to the pH-responsive nanoparticles via thiol-disulfide exchange. To enhance the immunogenicity of the protein antigen, the adjuvant CpG ODN 1826 was encapsulated in the nanoparticles by charge-charge interaction. Immunization of mice with the protein antigen in CpG ODN-loaded polymeric nanoparticles yielded greater populations of protective CD8+ lung-resident memory T cells and provided protection against influenza virus challenge. Whereas all control mice died after influenza virus challenge, mice treated with protein antigen in CpG ODN-loaded polymeric nanoparticles showed 83% survival.

Polylactide microparticles modified with didodecyldimethylammonium bromide were used for intramuscular delivery of hepatitis B surface antigen [37]. Hepatitis surface antigens were adsorbed onto the surfaces of polylactide microparticles. Three intramuscular injections of antigen-loaded polylactide microparticles yielded increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, CCL2, and CXCL1) at the injection site compared with that seen in mice that received the polylactide microparticle alone. Notably, after the third immunization, the group treated with antigen protein on polymeric nanoparticles exhibited tenfold higher antigen-specific IgG titers compared to the group treated with commercial alum-adjuvanted antigen.

Taken together, several polymer-based delivery systems have been reported to provide immune response against infectious diseases. Although polymers have shown feasibility of protein vaccine delivery, this field is still in infancy. In the cases of polymeric delivery systems, the biological and immunological studies on degradation products need to be done. In addition, the co-delivery strategies of immune adjuvants using polymeric systems would be concerns for higher immune responses.

Protein-based nanomaterials for the delivery of protein viral vaccines

Only a few studies have tested protein-based nanomaterials for vaccine delivery. As protein-based nanomaterials, ferritin [38], self-assembled protein nanoparticle [39], and virus-like particles (VLPs) have been exploited. Ferritin was studied for drug delivery due to its high drug-loading capacity, biocompatibility, and safety [40]. Ferritin was investigated for its ability to deliver doxorubicin to cancer cells via interaction with transferrin receptor 1, which is overexpressed on cancer cells [41]. Another study used ferritin to deliver cytochrome c for the induction of apoptosis in myeloid leukemia cells [42]. VLPs are morphologically similar to natural viruses, but lack the viral genetic materials inside. VLPs are composed only of capsid proteins, and thus do not cause infection or proliferate in host cells [43]. VLPs can be naturally obtained or synthesized and self-assembled into viral mimetic structures [44]. Vaccination with VLPs alone has been used clinically for hepatitis B and human papillomavirus vaccination.

In a study using ferritin nanocage for vaccine delivery, three sequential repeats of matrix 2 protein were conjugated to human heavy chain ferritin nanocages [38]. Intranasal administration of the viral matrix 2 protein-conjugated ferritin nanocages was found to induce antigen-specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a in serum, whereas intranasal administration of ferritin nanocage alone did not induce antigen-specific antibodies. No mouse that received intranasal ferritin nanocage was able to survive challenge with influenza virus. In contrast, intranasal immunization of mice with matrix 2 protein-conjugated ferritin nanoparticles provided complete protection against challenge with homologous and hetero-subtypic influenza virus, with challenged mice showing 100% survival.

Another group studied the intramuscular delivery of matrix 2 protein and head-removed hemagglutinin of influenza virus using double-layered protein nanoparticles [39]. Recombinant proteins containing four tandem copies of matrix 2 protein were constructed and self-assembled into protein nanoparticles by the ethanol desolvation method. Head-removed hemagglutinin proteins were then tagged to the surfaces of the matrix 2 protein nanoparticles through 3,3′-dithiobis (sulfosuccinimidyl propionate) crosslinking. Intramuscular administration of matrix 2 protein-loaded protein nanoparticles was found to elicit antigen-specific IgG antibodies in serum and protected the mice from challenge with mouse-adapted influenza A virus, compared with the phosphate buffer-treated group.

Non-pathogenic VLPs derived from bacteriophage P22 were examined for the intratracheal delivery of influenza virus hemagglutinin [45]. In this study, recombinant hemagglutinin head antigen from PR8 influenza virus was covalently conjugated to the surface of preassembled bacteriophage P22 VLPs through peptide-peptide specific interaction. Hemagglutinin head antigen-conjugated P22 VLPs showed a three-dimensional virus-mimetic morphology. Intratracheal instillation of mice with hemagglutinin head antigen alone yielded 60% survival and 13% body weight loss upon challenge with homologous influenza virus. Intratracheal administration of hemagglutinin head antigen-conjugated VLPs provided complete protection against the challenge with homologous PR8 influenza virus, with no loss in body weight.

Lass mammarenavirus-like protein nanoparticles were studied for the intramuscular delivery of the glycoprotein of Lassa mammarenavirus [46]. Lassa mammarenavirus is a rodent arenavirus that can cause acute hemorrhagic fever disease in humans [47]. In this study, the glycoprotein was not physically loaded or chemically conjugated; rather it was genetically fused to the gene of Lass mammarenavirus-like protein. Mammalian normal kidney MDCK II cells were used for expression of the genetically fused VLPs. The presence of glycoprotein on the surfaces of genetically engineered VLPs was aimed to mimic the natural Lassa mammarenavirus, which has glycoproteins on its surface. The administration of glycoprotein-fused VLPs was shown to elicit neutralizing antibody responses in the serum of rabbits. As an adjuvant, the toll-like receptor 4 agonist, monophosphoryl lipid A, was dispersed in an oil (squalene)/water emulsion. The combination of glycoprotein-fused VLPs with the squalene-based adjuvant increased the induction of neutralizing antibodies against five genetic lineages of Lassa mammarenavirus.

Influenza H1N1 VLPs were expressed from plant cells and studied as a potential vaccine against influenza virus [48]. The plant-derived VLPs were generated from Nicotiana benthamiana that had been pre-engineered to express influenza hemagglutinin. Hemagglutinin-bearing VLPs showed pleomorphic particulate structures similar to that of the native influenza virus and underwent 3-fold higher endocytosis by human monocyte-derived macrophages compared to hemagglutinin protein alone. Notably, this study observed the intracellular fate of the genetically fused VLPs. In human monocyte-derived macrophages, fluorescent dye-tagged genetically fused VLPs showed entry into early, late, and recycling endosomal pathways. At 45 min after pulse, the fluorescent dye-tagged genetically fused VLPs were found to be co-localized with MHC II, MHC I, and endosomal markers (Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11).

Compared with the many studies that have examined the use of lipid or polymeric nanoparticles for vaccine delivery, the studies using protein-based nanomaterials are limited. One reason for this is the complexity of constructing and producing protein-based nanomaterials. Another is the possibility for a protein-based nanomaterial to function as an antigen and trigger immune responses. Thus, the study of protein-based delivery systems should include evaluation of antibody development after repeated dosing.

Inorganic nanomaterials for the delivery of protein viral vaccines

Among the inorganic nanomaterials, metallic silver and gold nanoparticles have been studied for delivering influenza virus [49] and avian coronavirus [50]. Silver nanoparticles themselves have been reported to modulate innate immune responses and promote the pro-inflammatory cytokine release in innate immune cells [51]. Silver nanoparticles are known to have high surface energies, driving protein adsorption on the surface [52]. Gold nanoparticles are also known to have a high surface energy for protein adsorption [53].

Silver nanoparticles were applied for intratracheal delivery of heat-inactivated influenza A virus vaccine [49]. Using the protein adsorption feature of silver nanoparticles, the heat-inactivated influenza A virus was physically adsorbed on the surfaces of silver nanoparticles. After intratracheal injection, mice immunized with the virus adsorbed on silver nanoparticles showed enhanced levels of IL-12 and B-cell activating factor in bronchoalveolar lavages. Immunization with the virus antigen on silver nanoparticles protected mice from challenge with sub-lethal doses (300 pfu/mouse) of the same strain of influenza A virus. Mice immunized with the virus adsorbed on silver nanoparticles provided higher levels of antigen-specific IgA in bronchoalveolar lavages and antigen-specific IgG in serum, compared to the group immunized with head-inactivated virus alone.

Gold nanoparticles were studied for delivery of the capsid proteins of avian coronavirus [50]. In this study, capsid proteins were physically adsorbed on the surfaces of gold nanoparticles, where they formed three-dimensional virus-like structures. Intramuscular delivery of the capsid proteins adsorbed on the gold nanoparticles showed 6-fold higher distribution to draining lymph nodes compared to that achieved using free capsid proteins. In a chicken model, intramuscular injection of the capsid proteins adsorbed on the gold nanoparticles provided higher anti-infectious bronchitis virus spike protein IgG and IgA antibody titers and splenic T cells responses than administration of free capsid proteins, and provided complete protection against challenge with infectious bronchitis virus.

Metallic silver or gold nanoparticles may have advantages in protein vaccine formulations due to their protein-adsorption features. However, the safety of any metallic nanomaterial should be carefully considered. Due to their lack of biodegradation in the body, metallic nanoparticles may be retained in the body for prolonged periods, and thus may exert unexpected side effects. It has been reported that nanoparticles smaller than 10 nm can be excreted via the kidney [54]. Fabrication of metallic nanoparticles in excretable sizes would be one way to minimize the safety concerns. In the future, it could be useful to study the impact of metallic nanoparticle size on immune responses.

Nanovaccines against recently emerging infectious viral diseases

Despite advances in public health and ongoing development of therapeutics, pandemic infectious diseases still threaten humanity. In particular, as can be seen from the current epidemic of COVID-19, preventing the sudden spread of infectious diseases and intervention through the development of appropriate vaccines will be essential for human health moving forward [55]. In this context, the World Health Organization has selected nine priority diseases that are projected to cause the greatest public health risk and has announced that research and development should be intensively followed in order to be prepared for future outbreaks. The nine priority diseases are COVID-19, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Ebola virus disease, Marburg virus disease, Lassa fever, MERS, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Nipah and henipaviral diseases, Rift Valley fever, Zika, and Disease X. Given the unmet clinical and social needs for the fast development of vaccines against these priority diseases, this section separately addresses the nanovaccines currently being studied against recently emerging infectious viral diseases, along with their clinical significances. The types of various nanotechnology-based vaccines against recently emerging infectious viral diseases are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

The types of various nanotechnology-based vaccines against recently emerging infectious viral diseases

Target virus	Vaccine type	Antigens	Formulation	Route	Animal model	Reference
SARS-CoV-2	Nucleic acid	mRNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 RBD	Lipid nanoparticle	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice, cynomolgus monkeys	61
		Self-amplifying RNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein	Lipid nanoparticle	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	62
		Self-amplifying RNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein	Emulsion	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	63
MERS-CoV	Protein	MERS-CoV RBD	Polymeric nanoparticle	Subcutaneous	C57BL/6 mice	67
		MERS-CoV RBD	Protein-based nanoparticle	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	68
ZIKA virus	Nucleic acid	mRNA encoding pre-membrane and envelope glycoproteins	Lipid nanoparticle	Intradermal	Balb/c mice, rhesus macaques	74
		mRNA encoding pre-membrane and envelope glycoproteins	Lipid nanoparticle	Intramuscular	Balb/c mice	75
		mRNA encoding pre-membrane and envelope glycoproteins	Dendrimer-based nanoparticle	Intramuscular	C57BL/6 mice	76
		DNA encoding pre-membrane and envelope glycoproteins	Polymeric nanoparticle	Intramuscular	C57BL/6 mice	77
Ebola virus	Protein	Ebola virus spike protein	Lipid nanoparticle	Subcutaneous	C57BL/6 mice	81
		Ebola virus spike protein	Lipid nanoparticle	Subcutaneous	C57BL/6 mice	82
	Nucleic acid	DNA encoding Ebola virus glycoprotein	Polymeric nanoparticle	Microneedle patch	Mice from Charles River Laboratory	83

Nanovaccines against SARS-CoV-2

COVID-19 is unprecedented pandemic infection, affecting society and economy worldwide. It is caused by SARS-CoV-2, which was first identified in December 2019 [56]. With fever and cough as its main symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 is strongly contagious and has spread around the world. The World Health Organization declared a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. As of October 3, 2020, there have been 34,396,222 confirmed cases and the number of infected people keeps increasing. Given the lack of a preventive strategy other than social distancing and wearing masks, the need for vaccine development is increasingly urgent.

SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the betacoronavirus family, whose members have a viral envelope and a single-stranded RNA genome [57]. The corona structure of this virus is formed by spike-like glycoproteins on the outer membrane. There are four major structures that may be suitable target candidates for vaccine development: the spike (S) glycoprotein, the membrane (M) protein, the envelope (E) protein, and the nucleocapsid (N) protein [58]. Although only limited information is available about SARS-CoV-2 due to the suddenness of the outbreak, its structure resembles those of better-known coronaviruses [59]. By referring to accumulated databases harboring information on the previous coronavirus-caused infections (e.g., those of SARS and MERS) and using bioinformatics to predict the epitope structure, researchers worldwide have made rapid progress, and a few vaccines have already been approved in some countries [60].

Clinical trial phase I is ongoing using ionizable lipid-based nanoparticles for delivery of mRNA encoding the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 [61]. In this report, the lipid nanoparticles were composed of ionizable lipid 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, cholesterol, and pegylated lipids at a molar ratio of 50:10:38.5:1.5. The lipids in ethanol were mixed with citrate buffer (pH 4.0) containing mRNA through a T-shaped microfluidic mixer, and particles were formed through nanoprecipitation. The intramuscular administration of nanoparticles entrapping the mRNA of SARS-CoV-2 was shown to yield antigen protein expression at the injection site and induce significant SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies against three different epidemic strains of SARS-CoV-2, whereas no antibody elevation was detected in mice injected with empty lipid nanoparticles. The immunization also induced SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4+ and CD8+ effector memory T cells in spleen. The lipid nanoparticle with the mRNA was observed to be stable at room temperature for up to 7 days in storage.

Lipoplexes of saRNA with cationic lipid nanoparticles were reported as a feasible nanovaccine against SARS-CoV-2 [62]. The cationic lipid nanoparticles were composed of an ionizable cationic lipid (proprietary to Acuitas), phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and pegylated lipid at a molar ratio of 55:10:32.5:2.5. They were complexed to saRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein through a self-assembly process in which the lipid solution in ethanol was rapidly mixed with the mRNA in aqueous solution at pH 4.0. In a mouse model, the repeated intramuscular administration of lipoplexes of saRNA at 1-month intervals was shown to elicit SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies and neutralize infection with wild-type SARS-CoV-2 in a dose-dependent manner. Restimulation of splenocytes of the immunized mice with SARS-CoV-2 antigen provided a significant increase of IFN-γ. In the sera of the lipoplex-immunized mice, the authors observed elevated levels of cytokines and chemokines, including IL-6, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted), IFN-β, and interferon-γ-inducible protein-10.

In a nonhuman primate animal model, an inorganic nanoparticle-containing cationic squalene emulsion was investigated for intramuscular delivery of saRNA for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [63] (Fig. 3). The cationic emulsion was composed of cationic lipid 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTAP), Span 60, Tween 80, and squalene. In the squalene-based oil phase, 15-nm-sized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles were loaded to enhance the stability of the emulsion. The cationic emulsion was complexed to an anionic saRNA vaccine encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by charge-charge interaction. The emulsion complex form could protect saRNA from RNase degradation, and maintained its short-term stability up to 7 days. In mice, intramuscular administration of saRNA complexed to the cationic emulsion was found to elicit anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific IgG antibodies in the serum and increase IFN-γ levels in the spleen and lung. Notably, the immunization of pigtail macaques (a nonhuman primate) with the saRNA vaccine complexed to the cationic emulsion was shown to induce anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific IgG antibody responses persisting up to 70 days. The relationship between the doses and the duration of persistence may warrant further attention in the near future.

Fig. 3

Illustration of a nanovaccine against COVID-19. a Cationic squalene emulsion was composed of cationic lipid DOTAP, Span60, Tween 80, and squalene. To enhance the stability of the formulation, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) were loaded in oil phase. The formulation was complexed with saRNA (repRNA-CoV25) for intramuscular delivery. Adapted from [63]. b After endocytosis, SAS-CoV2-encoding saRNA was translated to the spike protein, and processed in antigen presenting cells. MHC I and MHC II antigen presentations induced SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular and humoral immune responses, respectively

RNA-based vaccines now have made a great achievement with approvals for human use. The development of lipid formulation techniques facilitated the delivery of RNA-based vaccines to the immune cells, and enabled the immune responses. RNA-based vaccines have great advantages of coping with variants of viral pathogens, since they do not need time-consuming protein design, expression, and purification processes. In line with the delivery system developments, the modification techniques of stabilizing antigen-encoding RNA attributed to the clinical success.

Nanovaccines against MERS-CoV

MERS-CoV, which was first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012, is a viral respiratory disease caused by coronavirus [64]. More than 2000 cases MERS-CoV infection, which has typical symptoms including fever, cough, and shortness of breath, have been reported by WHO since September 2012 in around 27 countries [65]. MERS-CoV is a zoonotic virus that arose in dromedary camel; it is transmitted by close contact between humans, and has a high case-fatality rate of 37.1% [66]. MERS-CoV infection is listed as a priority disease in need of urgent R&D attention by WHO, and vaccines are needed in the near future to prevent severe outbreaks of MERS-CoV.

PLGA nanoparticles have been studied for the delivery of recombinant MERS-CoV receptor binding domain antigens [67]. As an adjuvant, the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist, c-di-GMP, was encapsulated in the nanoparticles. Recombinant MERS-CoV receptor binding domain antigens were covalently conjugated to adjuvant-encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles containing a maleimide derivative of pegylated lipids. Subcutaneous injection with the antigen-conjugated and adjuvant-entrapped polymeric nanoparticles yielded higher titers of antigen-specific antibodies than seen in the group treated with a physical mixture of c-di-GMP and the recombinant antigen proteins. In human dipeptidyl peptidase 4 transgenic mice, which are susceptible to MERS-CoV infection, 100% of mice immunized with the antigen-conjugated and adjuvant-entrapped polymeric nanoparticles were protected from infection with MERS-CoV, while all mice treated with only adjuvant-entrapped polymeric nanoparticles died by day 16 post-infection.

In another study, genetic fusion protein-based nanoparticles were studied as a potential MERS-CoV vaccine [68] (Fig. 4). In the fusion protein, the receptor binding domain of MERS-CoV virus was genetically engineered to co-express an RNA-binding domain and ferritin. The RNA-binding domain was introduced to interact with an RNA chaperone, such that the protein would be properly folded after being translated in bacteria. Ferritin was introduced as a self-assembly scaffold for the nanoparticles. As an additional linker peptide, an SSG or ASG linker was introduced between the receptor-binding domain and ferritin. Among the protein nanoparticles formed from fusion proteins with different linker peptides, nanoparticles with the SSG linker yielded the highest antigen-specific IgG and IgA titers. The intramuscular administration of the protein nanoparticle with the SSG fusion linker also induced a cellular immune response in mice, which was reflected by increased production of IFN-γ and TNF-α from splenocytes.

Fig. 4

Ferritin-fused protein nanoparticles against MERS-CoV. Fusion proteins were composed of RNA binding domain (hRID), the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of MERS-CoV, and ferritin. Three fusion proteins were designed with different linker peptides between ferritin and RBD. Reprinted with permission from [68]

Nanovaccines against ZIKA virus

Zika virus is a flavivirus of the Flaviviridae family, whose members have a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome with structural capsid proteins and an envelope [69]. Zika virus infection, which was first identified in humans in the 1960s, causes sporadic outbreaks with mild symptoms, including fever, rash, muscle pain, and/or headache [70]. In 2015, a large outbreak of Zika virus infection took place in Brazil, and more than 200,000 cases were reported [71]. During that time, significant clinical concerns were identified when Zika virus infection was revealed to induce microcephaly, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and miscarriage [72]. The number of infected cases has decreased in recent years, but the development of a Zika virus vaccine would meet social needs due to its significant threat to pregnant women and their fetuses, its possibility to recur at any time, and its strong contagiousness [73].

In one study, lipid nanoparticles composed of an ionizable cationic lipid (proprietary to Acuitas), phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and pegylated lipids at a ratio of 50:10:38.5:1.5 were utilized for intradermal delivery of a modified mRNA of Zika virus [74]. The nucleosides of the mRNA were modified with 1-methylpseudouridine to facilitate the in vivo translation of the mRNA and prevent innate immune sensing by evading activation of endosomal toll-like receptor 3. For encapsulation of the mRNA, the lipids in ethanol were rapidly mixed with the mRNA in aqueous solution at pH 4 during the nanoparticle assembly process. As mRNA, nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding the pre-membrane and envelope glycoproteins of Zika virus (ZIKV H/PF/2013) was used. Intradermal administration of the modified mRNA in lipoplexes increased the production of IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-2 by splenocytes and protected non-human primate rhesus macaques against Zika virus challenge at 5 month post-immunization.

Cationic lipid nanoparticles were studied for the intramuscular delivery of an mRNA vaccine against Zika virus [75]. The nanoparticles were composed of 3-(dimethylamino)propyl(12Z,15Z)-3-[(9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dien-1-yl]henicosa-12,15-dienoate, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, cholesterol, and pegylated lipids at a molar ratio of 50:10:38.5:1.5. As a vaccine antigen, the researchers developed a modified mRNA lacking the conserved fusion-loop epitope in the envelope protein. In mice, intramuscular administration of the modified mRNA in lipoplexes elicited neutralizing antibodies in the serum and provided 100% survival after challenge with Zika virus. The levels of neutralizing antibodies were found to persist until 14 weeks post-immunization.

Dendrimer nanoparticles were used for the intramuscular delivery of an mRNA encoding the envelope protein of Zika virus [76]. The dendrimer nanoparticles were composed of a modified ionizable dendrimer based on poly(amido amine) dendrimer, with an ethylenediamine core and pegylated lipids. The complexes of the mRNA and dendrimer nanoparticles elevated the levels of Zika virus envelope protein-specific IgG antibodies in serum. The stimulation of splenocytes with IGVSNRDFV, an immunodominant MHC class I-restricted epitope of the envelope protein, was found to increase the populations of CD8 + T cells producing IFN-γ.

Block copolymer-based polymeric nanoparticles were studied for the delivery of a DNA vaccine against Zika virus [77]. In this study, a tetrafunctional amphiphilic block copolymer composed of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(propylene oxide) blocks with an ethylenediamine center moiety was used to load DNA encoding the full sequences of the pre-membrane and envelope glycoproteins. Through hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and charge interactions, the amphiphilic block copolymer and antigen-encoding DNA could form stable complexes. Intramuscular injection of mice with the DNA-loaded polyplexes induced neutralizing antibodies and protected the mice from Zika virus challenge for more than 7 months post-immunization.

Nanovaccines against Ebola

Ebola virus infection, which is also referred to as Ebola hemorrhagic fever, is a lethal disease characterized by high fever, headache, muscular pain, and hemorrhage [78]. The most commonly known Ebola virus is Zaire Ebola virus, which has a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA with helical nucleocapsids, and is transmitted by direct contact with body fluid or contaminated fomites [79]. Since the first outbreak of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1976, Ebola virus infection has recorded a steady death rate per year [80]. The biggest outbreak of Ebola to date occurred in West Africa in 2014; it caused more than 28,600 infections and 11,325 deaths.

A lipid and biopolymer hybrid nanoparticle was investigated for the subcutaneous delivery of the Ebola virus spike glycoprotein [81]. The hybrid nanoparticles consisted of various lipids, including 1,2-dioleoyloxy-3-(trimethylammonium)propane, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and maleimide-functionalized N-(4-carboxybenzyl)-N,N-dimethyl-2,3-bis(oleoyloxy)propan-1-aminium, which were crosslinked with thiolated hyaluronic acid. As an adjuvant, the toll-like receptor 4 agonist, monophosphoryl lipid A, was loaded in the hydrophobic lipid parts of the hybrid nanoparticles. Ebola virus spike glycoprotein was loaded into the nanoparticles during the hydration of hyaluronic acid-conjugated lipid films. A single dose vaccination of this glycoprotein-loaded nanoparticle was shown to provide a 128-fold higher antigen-specific IgG serum titer compared to that achieved with glycoprotein alone. The glycoprotein-loaded nanoparticle further protected 80% of the immunized mice from Ebola virus challenge, whereas soluble glycoprotein yielded only 10% protection.

Ebola virus spike glycoprotein was subcutaneously delivered using lipid nanoparticles with nickel elements [82] (Fig. 5). The lipid nanoparticles were composed of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[4-(p-maleimidophenyl) butyramide] sodium salt, and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[(N-(5-amino-1-carboxypentyl) iminodiacetic acid)succinyl] nickel salt. For crosslinking of the viral glycoprotein with the lipid bilayer, the researchers used a poly-histidine tagged protein and linked the histidine tag to the nickel elements of the lipid bilayers. The interaction between the histidine tag of the viral antigen and the nickel of the lipid bilayer enabled the glycoprotein to be loaded without chemical crosslinking or conformational change. The glycoprotein loading efficiency was 32.8%. Subcutaneous injection of the glycoprotein in the lipid nanoparticles increased the percentage of antigen-specific B cells in secondary lymph organs and yielded 5.8-fold more IFN-γ-expressing T cells in spleen compared to those in the group treated with soluble glycoprotein antigen alone.

Fig. 5

Lipid nanoparticles for delivery of Ebola virus glycoprotein. Ebola virus glycoproteins were loaded to lipid nanoparticles via histidine and nickel interactions. Reprinted with permission from [82]. NTA nitrilotriacetic acid, ICMV interbilayer-crosslinked multilamellar vesicles, DTT dithiothreitol

Copolymer-based cationic nanoparticles were studied for delivery of DNA encoding glycoprotein of Ebola virus [83]. PLGA nanoparticles were coated with pol-l-lysine to form cationic nanoparticles, and the DNA vaccine was loaded onto the surface of these poly-l-lysine-coated cationic PLGA nanoparticles. The complexes of DNA with the cationic nanoparticles were further coated on the surfaces of a microneedle composed of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinylpyrrolidone. Skin application of the polyplexed DNA-coated microneedle patch yielded higher antigen-specific IgG titers compared with intramuscular injection of naked DNA. Moreover, the microneedle-vaccinated group was able to neutralize 50% of glycoprotein-pseudovirions.

Overall, specific delivery systems have shown promises against various viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, Zika virus, and Ebola virus. In viral vaccines, the emerging new variants are critical issues. Currently, more studies have been done to formulate nucleic acid vaccines compared with protein vaccines. Nucleic acid vaccines may have advantage to cope with rapidly emerging variants of infectious viruses. In the cases of protein vaccines, studies on conservative domains of viruses would be important. The development of multi-valent vaccines which can induce immune responses for several strains of viruses would be a direction to purse in the future.

Challenges and perspectives

Although significant progress has been made in the nanotechnologies for delivering various viral vaccine antigens, several challenges remain to be addressed in future studies. In the cases of nucleic acid vaccine delivery, the degradation of nucleic acid antigens in lysosomes would be expected to lower the immunogenicity. Peptides or chemicals have been reported to facilitate the endosomal escape of lysosomal cargoes. For instance, KALA peptide (an amphiphilic cationic peptide) was conjugated to lipid nanoparticles to enhance the escape efficiency of delivered cargoes from endosomes to cytoplasm [84]. The antimalarial agent, chloroquine, has been reported to facilitate the endosomal escape of cholesterol-conjugated siRNA, which resulted in 6-fold higher target gene knockdown compared to that obtained with free cholesterol-conjugated siRNA [85]. More studies on the lysosome-escaping ability of new materials or co-delivery of nucleic acid vaccines with lysosome escape-promoting agents are expected to improve the efficacy of nucleic acid vaccine delivery systems.

The combination of nanovaccines with other adjuvant systems needs to be studied further. A few studies reported that enhanced immunogenicity was achieved by combining nanovaccines with commercial adjuvants [46], or co-delivering nanovaccines with adjuvants in a nanomaterial. In cancer immunotherapy, the entrapment of various immune adjuvants (e.g., imiquimod) was found to enhance dendritic cells maturation and systemic immune responses [86]. The entrapment of adjuvants in the lipid bilayers of liposomes or the hydrophobic core parts of polymeric nanoparticles may be one way to improve the immune responses of co-delivered vaccine antigens.

Most studies have focused on the development of immune responses and survival upon challenge. Antigen-specific serum IgG levels have been evaluated after administration of most delivery systems. When developing vaccines against viruses that infect through mucosal routes, researcher should monitor the induction of IgA in mucosal secretions. For more elaborate design and evaluation at the initial stage of nanomaterial development, mechanism studies should be fortified, such as by including studies on intracellular endocytosis pathways, intracellular trafficking, and possibly exocytosis. The MHC class I and II processing pathways of delivered antigens need to be studied. For nucleic acid vaccines, the secretion of expressed protein antigens and their uptake by adjacent antigen-presenting cells can boost MHC class II processing.

For clinical translation, the manufacturing process and physical stability of nanomaterial-based vaccines should be studied during the development phase [87]. Given the limitation of worldwide cold chains, the stability of vaccine candidates under humid and hot conditions should be studied. For lipid-based delivery systems, the oxidations of lipid components during storage can be a concern. In nanoparticle formulations, the precipitation and related size changes of nanoparticles would alter the efficacy and safety. In the final formulation, the use of excipients to protect the antigen and delivery components from various degrading stimuli, such as oxygen, light, and moisture should be studied.

In addition to monitoring the physical stability of vaccine formulations over time, the persistence of induced antibodies should be evaluated over prolonged periods during the development of vaccine delivery systems. Only a few existing studies have tested the persistence of antibodies after treatment with nanoformulation-based delivery systems [63]. Future studies should monitor how the dosing amount, frequency, and interval affects the induction and duration of antibody responses.

The choice of a proper administration route for vaccination is a critical factor in vaccine efficacy and successful vaccine development. To induce desirable vaccine efficacy, the vaccine should be transported from the administered site to suitable immune organs where the immune reaction should occur. As the types and extents of induced immune responses differ according to the vaccine administration site, careful considerations are necessary for vaccine development. To date, the majority of investigated delivery systems have been administered using intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intradermal injections.

Noninvasive forms of delivery systems need to be studied more in the future. A few studies have reported the skin delivery using microneedle patches. Noninvasive mucosal or topical delivery systems may have advantages over parenteral injection. For example, they can increase patient compliance by reducing pain and enabling administration in the home without needing a healthcare professional [88]. Such systems would also reduce disease transmission from needle-reuse, which has been a problem worldwide [89]. Mucosal vaccine delivery systems may face challenges, such as mucocilliary clearance and enzymatic degradation at mucosal surfaces [88], but these limitations could possibly be overcome by using mucosal vaccine formulations with muco-adhesive properties or applying specific administration devices.

In parallel with continued progress in developing and evaluating delivery systems, the rapid analysis of vaccine candidates could be important. Various technologies are needed to develop vaccines for rapid and efficient prevention of infectious diseases. One such technology would be the application of bioinformatics to analyze databases and provide information for rapid vaccine development [90]. When SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a new pathogen, there was not much specific information available. However, the accumulated coronavirus-related data stored in databases such as the existing Immune Epitope Data-based and Analysis Resource or Virus Pathogen Resource provided a great deal of information about the new pathogen. Bioinformatic studies revealed that there is significant structural homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Moreover, bioinformatics tools (e.g., BepiPred, DiscoTope, and TepiTool) enabled researchers to predict the sequences and tertiary structures of the relevant B cell and T cell epitopes. In this way, the application of bioinformatics in vaccine development will be a powerful tool to quickly and efficiently derive vaccine candidates when an unexpected infectious disease occurs in the future.

Conclusions

To prepare rapid countermeasures against a variety of unpredictable pathogens threatening humanity, future vaccines are expected to rely on nanoplatform technology for antigen delivery. It currently takes several years to develop a vaccine after the onset of an infectious disease, and thus, it is difficult to prevent the rapid spread of a disease like COVID-19 using the conventional vaccine development process. The versatile characteristics of nanotechnology will enable various strategies aimed at modulating the immune responses of vaccine antigens. Preventing enzymatic degradation and ensuring controlled release of antigens are key features of nanocarriers that can be rapidly applied to vaccine delivery. Nanocarrier delivery systems can also get the vaccine to the target site efficiently by enhancing the targeting of specific immune cells through the conjugation of receptor-specific ligand molecules. This active targeting will help transport the vaccine to specific organs and immune cells, and thereby facilitate antigen uptake. The pipelines for developing vaccine delivery systems that can generate potent immune responses can offer great potential for rapid development of new-generation vaccines.