Anjali A Wagle1, Nino Isakadze2, Khurram Nasir3, Seth Shay Martin4,2. 1. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Harvey Building, Suite 808, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. awagle2@jhmi.edu. 2. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Harvey Building, Suite 808, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The past few decades have seen significant technologic innovation for the treatment and diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. The subsequent growing complexity of modern medicine, however, is causing fundamental challenges in our healthcare system primarily in the spheres of patient involvement, data generation, and timely clinical implementation. The Institute of Medicine advocated for a learning health system (LHS) in which knowledge generation and patient care are inherently symbiotic. The purpose of this paper is to review how the advances in technology and big data have been used to further patient care and data generation and what future steps will need to occur to develop a LHS in cardiovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Patient-centered care has progressed from technologic advances yielding resources like decision aids. LHS can also incorporate patient preferences by increasing and standardizing patient-reported information collection. Additionally, data generation can be optimized using big data analytics by developing large interoperable datasets from multiple sources to allow for real-time data feedback. Developing a LHS will require innovative technologic solutions with a patient-centered lens to facilitate symbiosis in data generation and clinical practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The past few decades have seen significant technologic innovation for the treatment and diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. The subsequent growing complexity of modern medicine, however, is causing fundamental challenges in our healthcare system primarily in the spheres of patient involvement, data generation, and timely clinical implementation. The Institute of Medicine advocated for a learning health system (LHS) in which knowledge generation and patient care are inherently symbiotic. The purpose of this paper is to review how the advances in technology and big data have been used to further patient care and data generation and what future steps will need to occur to develop a LHS in cardiovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS:Patient-centered care has progressed from technologic advances yielding resources like decision aids. LHS can also incorporate patient preferences by increasing and standardizing patient-reported information collection. Additionally, data generation can be optimized using big data analytics by developing large interoperable datasets from multiple sources to allow for real-time data feedback. Developing a LHS will require innovative technologic solutions with a patient-centered lens to facilitate symbiosis in data generation and clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Big data; Learning health systems; Patient-centered; Patient-reported outcomes; Shared decision-making
Authors: Simon A Mahler; Robert F Riley; Brian C Hiestand; Gregory B Russell; James W Hoekstra; Cedric W Lefebvre; Bret A Nicks; David M Cline; Kim L Askew; Stephanie B Elliott; David M Herrington; Gregory L Burke; Chadwick D Miller Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2015-03-03
Authors: Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Mick P Couper; Eleanor Singer; Peter A Ubel; Sonja Ziniel; Floyd J Fowler; Carrie A Levin; Angela Fagerlin Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Angelo E Volandes; Adrian Edwards; Victor M Montori Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Megan Coylewright; Sara Dick; Becky Zmolek; Jason Askelin; Edward Hawkins; Megan Branda; Jonathan W Inselman; Claudia Zeballos-Palacios; Nilay D Shah; Erik P Hess; Annie LeBlanc; Victor M Montori; Henry H Ting Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-11-01
Authors: Richard G Thomson; Martin P Eccles; I Nick Steen; Jane Greenaway; Lynne Stobbart; Madeleine J Murtagh; Carl R May Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-06
Authors: Larry A Allen; Lynne W Stevenson; Kathleen L Grady; Nathan E Goldstein; Daniel D Matlock; Robert M Arnold; Nancy R Cook; G Michael Felker; Gary S Francis; Paul J Hauptman; Edward P Havranek; Harlan M Krumholz; Donna Mancini; Barbara Riegel; John A Spertus Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sean Arayasirikul; Caitlin M Turner; Dillon Trujillo; Jarett Maycott; Erin C Wilson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 7.076