Literature DB >> 3369383

Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations.

K I Maton1.   

Abstract

This study examined the relationship of three social support and three organizational variables to two well-being and two group appraisal variables among 144 members of Compassionate Friends, Multiple Sclerosis, and Overeaters Anonymous self-help groups. An anonymous questionnaire was the major research instrument. Receiving social support was not significantly related to depression or anxiety but was positively related to perceived group benefits and group satisfaction. Providing social support and friendship were each positively related to one well-being and one group appraisal variable. Bidirectional supporters (i.e., individuals high on both receiving and providing support) reported more favorable well-being and group appraisal than Receivers, Providers, and Low Supporters. At the group level of analysis (n = 15 groups), groups with higher levels of role differentiation, greater order and organization, and in which leaders were perceived as more capable contained members who reported more positive well-being and group appraisal. The implications for future research and professional consultation to self-help groups are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3369383     DOI: 10.1007/bf00906072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Community Psychol        ISSN: 0091-0562


  14 in total

1.  Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; I: qualitative analysis of program materials and testimonies.

Authors:  Patrick W Corrigan; Joseph D Calabrese; Sarah E Diwan; Cornelius B Keogh; Lorraine Keck; Carol Mussey
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2002-08

2.  Social support exchange and quality of life among the Korean elderly.

Authors:  H K Kim; M Hisata; I Kai; S K Lee
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2000

3.  SCALE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE TO ASSESS COMMUNITY-BASED AND CLINICAL INTERVENTION GROUP ENVIRONMENTS.

Authors:  Patrick A Wilson; Nathan B Hansen; Nalini Tarakeshwar; Sharon Neufeld; Arlene Kochman; Kathleen J Sikkema
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-04

4.  Empathic exchanges in online cancer support groups: distinguishing message expression and reception effects.

Authors:  Jeong Yeob Han; Dhavan V Shah; Eunkyung Kim; Kang Namkoong; Sun-Young Lee; Tae Joon Moon; Rich Cleland; Q Lisa Bu; Fiona M McTavish; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-03

5.  The structure of social exchange in self-help support groups: development of a measure.

Authors:  Louis D Brown; Xiaohui Tang; Ruth L Hollman
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2014-03

6.  A community-based randomized controlled trial of Mom Power parenting intervention for mothers with interpersonal trauma histories and their young children.

Authors:  Katherine L Rosenblum; Maria Muzik; Diana M Morelen; Emily A Alfafara; Nicole M Miller; Rachel M Waddell; Melisa M Schuster; Julie Ribaudo
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2017-06-25       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Impressions of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) Group Cohesion: A Case for a Nonspecific Factor Predicting Later AA Attendance.

Authors:  Samara Lloyd Rice; J Scott Tonigan
Journal:  Alcohol Treat Q       Date:  2012-01-04

8.  The development and evaluation of a compassion scale.

Authors:  David Martins; Nichole A Nicholas; Magda Shaheen; Loretta Jones; Keith Norris
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-08

9.  Latent profiles of physical and psychological outcomes of bereaved parents in China who lost their only child.

Authors:  Ningning Zhou; Wei Yu; Hui Huang; Guangyuan Shi; Haoxian Luo; Chao Song; Yilun Xing; Jianping Wang; Clare Killikelly
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2018-11-16

10.  Study protocol for the 'HelpMeDoIt!' randomised controlled feasibility trial: an app, web and social support-based weight loss intervention for adults with obesity.

Authors:  Lynsay Matthews; Juliana Pugmire; Laurence Moore; Mark Kelson; Alex McConnachie; Emma McIntosh; Sarah Morgan-Trimmer; Simon Murphy; Kathryn Hughes; Elinor Coulman; Olga Utkina-Macaskill; Sharon Anne Simpson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.