| Literature DB >> 30479701 |
Ningning Zhou1, Wei Yu2, Hui Huang1, Guangyuan Shi1, Haoxian Luo1, Chao Song1, Yilun Xing1, Jianping Wang1,3, Clare Killikelly4.
Abstract
Background: Along with the implementation of the one-child policy in China, a special group of bereaved parents called 'shiduer' (), meaning parents bereaved by the loss of their only child, emerged. Although previous research has examined the physical and psychological health of this population, individual differences in physical and psychological outcomes are still not well understood. Objective: This study aimed to identify heterogenous subgroups of Chinese bereaved parents who lost their only child based on the physical and psychological health of this population as well as the predictive factors of each subgroup. Method: Latent profile analysis was used to explore underlying patterns of physical and psychological indicators including subjective physical health, negative psychological outcomes (i.e. depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and prolonged grief disorder) and positive psychological outcomes (i.e. post-traumatic growth) among a sample of Chinese bereaved parents who lost their only child (N = 536). A three-step approach was used to examine the effects of covariates including quality of spousal relationship and recruitment channels on psychological and physical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Latent profile analysis; bereaved parents; losing an only child in China; psychological health; subjective physical health; • Three subgroups which presented a severity-based gradient were identified, i.e. a ‘resilient‘ subgroup, a ‘coping’ subgroup and a ‘dysfunctional’ subgroup.• The ‘coping’ subgroup had the highest levels of post-traumatic growth.• Less satisfaction with spousal relationship and recruitment from the online self-help groups and community institutions are associated with the membership of the ‘coping’ or ‘dysfunctional’ subgroup compared to the ‘resilient’ subgroup.
Year: 2018 PMID: 30479701 PMCID: PMC6249556 DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1544026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol ISSN: 2000-8066
Socio-demographic, loss-related characteristics, quality of spousal relationship and recruitment channels.
| Total sample ( | |
|---|---|
| Socio-demographic information | |
| Age of parents; mean (SD) | 60.46 (6.89) |
| Gender; female | 336 (62.7%) |
| Place of residence | |
| Village | 156 (29.1%) |
| Town | 55 (10.3%) |
| City | 274 (51.1%) |
| Marriage status | |
| Divorced or separated | 77 (14.4%) |
| Widowed | 75 (14.0%) |
| Marriage or remarriage | 376 (70.1%) |
| Educational background | |
| Primary school | 144 (26.8%) |
| Middle or high school | 336 (62.7%) |
| Above college | 36 (6.7%) |
| Monthly income; mean (SD) | 1845.67 (1297.24) |
| Religious faith | 51 (9.5%) |
| Loss-related variables | |
| Age of the child; mean (SD) | 25.21 (7.92) |
| Gender; female | 159 (29.7%) |
| Cause of death; accident | 392 (73.1%) |
| Time since loss; mean (SD) | 9.50 (7.12) |
| Having a grandchild | 148 (27.6%) |
| Quality of spousal relationship; mean (SD) | 3.25 (0.88) |
| Recruiting channels | |
| Community institutions | 207 |
| Offline support groups | 160 |
| Online self-help groups | 169 |
SD = Standard Deviation.
Goodness-of-fit statistics for 1 to 6 class solutions.
| No. of groups | Loglikelihood | Free parameter | AIC | BIC | SS-BIC | Entropy | LMR-LRT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −3801.30 | 10 | 7622.60 | 7665.44 | 7633.70 | |||
| 2 | −3301.89 | 16 | 6635.78 | 6704.32 | 6653.53 | 0.94 | 998.82 | 0.001 |
| 3 | −3046.04 | 22 | 6136.08 | 6230.33 | 6160.49 | 0.95 | 511.70 | 0.001 |
| 4 | −3005.21 | 28 | 6066.41 | 6186.37 | 6097.48 | 0.88 | 81.67 | 0.34 |
| 5 | −2932.08 | 34 | 5932.17 | 6077.83 | 5969.90 | 0.91 | 146.24 | 0.001 |
| 6 | −2904.83 | 40 | 5889.67 | 6061.03 | 5934.06 | 0.91 | 54.50 | 0.16 |
AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion; SS-BIC = Sample Size Adjusted BIC; LMR-LRT = Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test.
Figure 1.Uncentered means of the three latent profile model of Chinese bereaved parents who lost their only child.
PGD = Prolonged Grief Disorder; PTSD = Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; PTG = Post-Traumatic Growth.
Means, standard deviations and diagnostic information for each latent group per the three-profile solution.
| Total sample | Resilient | Coping | Dysfunctional ( | Wald’s test approx. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical health | |||||
| Mean score (SE) | 34.98 (0.54) | 42.85 (1.04) | 33.09 (0.61) | 22.83 (1.28) | 151.09*** |
| Depression | |||||
| Mean score (SE) | 36.43 (0.44) | 24.66 (0.45) | 39.24 (0.32) | 54.83 (1.07) | 1044.07*** |
| Probable diagnosis (39 cut-off score) | 236 (44.0%) | 4 (2.6%) | 189 (55.9%) | 43 (95.6%) | 10273.16*** |
| PGD | |||||
| Mean score (SE) | 31.17 (0.38) | 19.40 (0.32) | 34.73 (0.27) | 44.23 (0.80) | 1739.79*** |
| Probable diagnosis (algorithm) | 87 (16.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 52 (15.4%) | 35 (77.8%) | 174.33*** |
| PTSD | |||||
| Mean score (SE) | 46.20 (0.59) | 29.84 (0.57) | 49.91 (0.37) | 73.24 (1.27) | 1394.85*** |
| Probable diagnosis (50 cut-off score) | 200 (37.3%) | 3 (2.0%) | 152 (45.0%) | 45 (100.0%) | 3796.73*** |
| PTG | |||||
| Mean score (SE) | 56.80 (0.71) | 44.85 (1.07) | 63.21 (0.76) | 50.15 (3.43) | 193.93*** |
| THREE DIAGNOSIS (depression, PTSD, PGD) | 67 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 33 (9.8%) | 34 (75.6%) | 254.26*** |
**p < .01; ***p < .001; SE = Standard Error; PGD = Prolonged Grief Disorder; PTSD = Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; PTG = Post-traumatic growth.
Three-step approach predicting group membership and summary of the beta coefficients of the different predictor per group after controlling socio-demographic and loss-related variables.
| Coping vs. resilient | Dysfunctional vs. resilient | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% CI | 95% CI | |||||||
| Spousal relationship | −0.63 | 0.22 | (−1.06, −0.20) | 0.005 | −1.04 | 0.29 | (−1.61, −0.47) | < 0.001 |
| Recruiting channels | ||||||||
| Community institutions | 2.55 | 0.37 | (1.82, 3.28) | < 0.001 | 4.83 | 0.97 | (2.92, 6.74) | < 0.001 |
| Online self-help groups | 3.48 | 0.42 | (2.65, 4.31) | < 0.001 | 3.30 | 1.12 | (1.10, 5.50) | 0.003 |
95% CI = 95% confidence interval.