| Literature DB >> 33693696 |
Kathie Y Sun1,2, Daniel Oreper1,2, Sarah A Schoenrock1,3, Rachel McMullan1,4, Paola Giusti-Rodríguez1, Vasyl Zhabotynsky5, Darla R Miller1,6, Lisa M Tarantino1,7, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena1,6, William Valdar1,6.
Abstract
Female mammals are functional mosaics of their parental X-linked gene expression due to X chromosome inactivation (XCI). This process inactivates one copy of the X chromosome in each cell during embryogenesis and that state is maintained clonally through mitosis. In mice, the choice of which parental X chromosome remains active is determined by the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), which has been mapped to a 176-kb candidate interval. A series of functional Xce alleles has been characterized or inferred for classical inbred strains based on biased, or skewed, inactivation of the parental X chromosomes in crosses between strains. To further explore the function structure basis and location of the Xce, we measured allele-specific expression of X-linked genes in a large population of F1 females generated from Collaborative Cross (CC) strains. Using published sequence data and applying a Bayesian "Pólya urn" model of XCI skew, we report two major findings. First, inter-individual variability in XCI suggests mouse epiblasts contain on average 20-30 cells contributing to brain. Second, CC founder strain NOD/ShiLtJ has a novel and unique functional allele, Xceg, that is the weakest in the Xce allelic series. Despite phylogenetic analysis confirming that NOD/ShiLtJ carries a haplotype almost identical to the well-characterized C57BL/6J (Xceb), we observed unexpected patterns of XCI skewing in females carrying the NOD/ShiLtJ haplotype within the Xce. Copy number variation is common at the Xce locus and we conclude that the observed allelic series is a product of independent and recurring duplications shared between weak Xce alleles.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian hierarchical modeling; copy number variation; dosage compensation; multiparent population
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33693696 PMCID: PMC8128399 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genetics ISSN: 0016-6731 Impact factor: 4.562