Literature DB >> 33693581

Protein Interaction Interface Region Prediction by Geometric Deep Learning.

Bowen Dai1, Chris Bailey-Kellogg1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions drive wide-ranging molecular processes, and characterizing at the atomic level how proteins interact (beyond just the fact that they interact) can provide key insights into understanding and controlling this machinery. Unfortunately, experimental determination of three-dimensional protein complex structures remains difficult and does not scale to the increasingly large sets of proteins whose interactions are of interest. Computational methods are thus required to meet the demands of large-scale, high-throughput prediction of how proteins interact, but unfortunately both physical modeling and machine learning methods suffer from poor precision and/or recall.
RESULTS: In order to improve performance in predicting protein interaction interfaces, we leverage the best properties of both data- and physics-driven methods to develop a unified Geometric Deep Neural Network, "PInet" (Protein Interface Network). PInet consumes pairs of point clouds encoding the structures of two partner proteins, in order to predict their structural regions mediating interaction. To make such predictions, PInet learns and utilizes models capturing both geometrical and physicochemical molecular surface complementarity. In application to a set of benchmarks, PInet simultaneously predicts the interface regions on both interacting proteins, achieving performance equivalent to or even much better than the state-of-the-art predictor for each dataset. Furthermore, since PInet is based on joint segmentation of a representation of a protein surfaces, its predictions are meaningful in terms of the underlying physical complementarity driving molecular recognition. AVAILABILITY: PInet scripts and models are available at https://github.com/FTD007/PInet. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33693581      PMCID: PMC8428585          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  34 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen M Berman; Tammy Battistuz; T N Bhat; Wolfgang F Bluhm; Philip E Bourne; Kyle Burkhardt; Zukang Feng; Gary L Gilliland; Lisa Iype; Shri Jain; Phoebe Fagan; Jessica Marvin; David Padilla; Veerasamy Ravichandran; Bohdan Schneider; Narmada Thanki; Helge Weissig; John D Westbrook; Christine Zardecki
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes.

Authors:  Stephen R Comeau; David W Gatchell; Sandor Vajda; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Antibody specific epitope prediction-emergence of a new paradigm.

Authors:  Inbal Sela-Culang; Yanay Ofran; Bjoern Peters
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Brian Pierce; Julian Mintseris; Joël Janin; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-15

6.  PAIRpred: partner-specific prediction of interacting residues from sequence and structure.

Authors:  Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas; Brian J Geiss; Asa Ben-Hur
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-06

7.  BIPSPI: a method for the prediction of partner-specific protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Ruben Sanchez-Garcia; C O S Sorzano; J M Carazo; Joan Segura
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking.

Authors:  Jens Vindahl Kringelum; Claus Lundegaard; Ole Lund; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations.

Authors:  Todd J Dolinsky; Paul Czodrowski; Hui Li; Jens E Nielsen; Jan H Jensen; Gerhard Klebe; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Computationally-driven identification of antibody epitopes.

Authors:  Casey K Hua; Albert T Gacerez; Charles L Sentman; Margaret E Ackerman; Yoonjoo Choi; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning methods for 3D structural proteome and interactome modeling.

Authors:  Dongjin Lee; Dapeng Xiong; Shayne Wierbowski; Le Li; Siqi Liang; Haiyuan Yu
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Deep graph learning of inter-protein contacts.

Authors:  Ziwei Xie; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Mitigating cold-start problems in drug-target affinity prediction with interaction knowledge transferring.

Authors:  Tri Minh Nguyen; Thin Nguyen; Truyen Tran
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.994

4.  Implications of the Essential Role of Small Molecule Ligand Binding Pockets in Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction for Targeted Protein Degradation.

Authors:  Oliver Orasch; Noah Weber; Michael Müller; Amir Amanzadi; Chiara Gasbarri; Christopher Trummer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Computational epitope binning reveals functional equivalence of sequence-divergent paratopes.

Authors:  Jarjapu Mahita; Dong-Gun Kim; Sumin Son; Yoonjoo Choi; Hak-Sung Kim; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.155

7.  InDeep: 3D fully convolutional neural networks to assist in silico drug design on protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Vincent Mallet; Luis Checa Ruano; Alexandra Moine Franel; Michael Nilges; Karen Druart; Guillaume Bouvier; Olivier Sperandio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  PIPENN: Protein Interface Prediction from sequence with an Ensemble of Neural Nets.

Authors:  Bas Stringer; Hans de Ferrante; Sanne Abeln; Jaap Heringa; K Anton Feenstra; Reza Haydarlou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Mingzhen Zhang; Yonglan Liu; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.466

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.