MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions drive wide-ranging molecular processes, and characterizing at the atomic level how proteins interact (beyond just the fact that they interact) can provide key insights into understanding and controlling this machinery. Unfortunately, experimental determination of three-dimensional protein complex structures remains difficult and does not scale to the increasingly large sets of proteins whose interactions are of interest. Computational methods are thus required to meet the demands of large-scale, high-throughput prediction of how proteins interact, but unfortunately both physical modeling and machine learning methods suffer from poor precision and/or recall. RESULTS: In order to improve performance in predicting protein interaction interfaces, we leverage the best properties of both data- and physics-driven methods to develop a unified Geometric Deep Neural Network, "PInet" (Protein Interface Network). PInet consumes pairs of point clouds encoding the structures of two partner proteins, in order to predict their structural regions mediating interaction. To make such predictions, PInet learns and utilizes models capturing both geometrical and physicochemical molecular surface complementarity. In application to a set of benchmarks, PInet simultaneously predicts the interface regions on both interacting proteins, achieving performance equivalent to or even much better than the state-of-the-art predictor for each dataset. Furthermore, since PInet is based on joint segmentation of a representation of a protein surfaces, its predictions are meaningful in terms of the underlying physical complementarity driving molecular recognition. AVAILABILITY: PInet scripts and models are available at https://github.com/FTD007/PInet. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions drive wide-ranging molecular processes, and characterizing at the atomic level how proteins interact (beyond just the fact that they interact) can provide key insights into understanding and controlling this machinery. Unfortunately, experimental determination of three-dimensional protein complex structures remains difficult and does not scale to the increasingly large sets of proteins whose interactions are of interest. Computational methods are thus required to meet the demands of large-scale, high-throughput prediction of how proteins interact, but unfortunately both physical modeling and machine learning methods suffer from poor precision and/or recall. RESULTS: In order to improve performance in predicting protein interaction interfaces, we leverage the best properties of both data- and physics-driven methods to develop a unified Geometric Deep Neural Network, "PInet" (Protein Interface Network). PInet consumes pairs of point clouds encoding the structures of two partner proteins, in order to predict their structural regions mediating interaction. To make such predictions, PInet learns and utilizes models capturing both geometrical and physicochemical molecular surface complementarity. In application to a set of benchmarks, PInet simultaneously predicts the interface regions on both interacting proteins, achieving performance equivalent to or even much better than the state-of-the-art predictor for each dataset. Furthermore, since PInet is based on joint segmentation of a representation of a protein surfaces, its predictions are meaningful in terms of the underlying physical complementarity driving molecular recognition. AVAILABILITY: PInet scripts and models are available at https://github.com/FTD007/PInet. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Helen M Berman; Tammy Battistuz; T N Bhat; Wolfgang F Bluhm; Philip E Bourne; Kyle Burkhardt; Zukang Feng; Gary L Gilliland; Lisa Iype; Shri Jain; Phoebe Fagan; Jessica Marvin; David Padilla; Veerasamy Ravichandran; Bohdan Schneider; Narmada Thanki; Helge Weissig; John D Westbrook; Christine Zardecki Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Date: 2002-05-29
Authors: Todd J Dolinsky; Paul Czodrowski; Hui Li; Jens E Nielsen; Jan H Jensen; Gerhard Klebe; Nathan A Baker Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-05-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Casey K Hua; Albert T Gacerez; Charles L Sentman; Margaret E Ackerman; Yoonjoo Choi; Chris Bailey-Kellogg Journal: Elife Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Oliver Orasch; Noah Weber; Michael Müller; Amir Amanzadi; Chiara Gasbarri; Christopher Trummer Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Bas Stringer; Hans de Ferrante; Sanne Abeln; Jaap Heringa; K Anton Feenstra; Reza Haydarlou Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 6.937