Literature DB >> 33693348

Novel Computational Approach to Predict Off-Target Interactions for Small Molecules.

Mohan S Rao1, Rishi Gupta2, Michael J Liguori1, Mufeng Hu3, Xin Huang3, Srinivasa R Mantena1, Scott W Mittelstadt1, Eric A G Blomme1, Terry R Van Vleet1.   

Abstract

Most small molecule drugs interact with unintended, often unknown, biological targets and these off-target interactions may lead to both preclinical and clinical toxic events. Undesired off-target interactions are often not detected using current drug discovery assays, such as experimental polypharmacological screens. Thus, improvement in the early identification of off-target interactions represents an opportunity to reduce safety-related attrition rates during preclinical and clinical development. In order to better identify potential off-target interactions that could be linked to predictable safety issues, a novel computational approach to predict safety-relevant interactions currently not covered was designed and evaluated. These analyses, termed Off-Target Safety Assessment (OTSA), cover more than 7,000 targets (~35% of the proteome) and > 2,46,704 preclinical and clinical alerts (as of January 20, 2019). The approach described herein exploits a highly curated training set of >1 million compounds (tracking >20 million compound-structure activity relationship/SAR data points) with known in vitro activities derived from patents, journals, and publicly available databases. This computational process was used to predict both the primary and secondary pharmacological activities for a selection of 857 diverse small molecule drugs for which extensive secondary pharmacology data are readily available (456 discontinued and 401 FDA approved). The OTSA process predicted a total of 7,990 interactions for these 857 molecules. Of these, 3,923 and 4,067 possible high-scoring interactions were predicted for the discontinued and approved drugs, respectively, translating to an average of 9.3 interactions per drug. The OTSA process correctly identified the known pharmacological targets for >70% of these drugs, but also predicted a significant number of off-targets that may provide additional insight into observed in vivo effects. About 51.5% (2,025) and 22% (900) of these predicted high-scoring interactions have not previously been reported for the discontinued and approved drugs, respectively, and these may have a potential for repurposing efforts. Moreover, for both drug categories, higher promiscuity was observed for compounds with a MW range of 300 to 500, TPSA of ~200, and clogP ≥7. This computation also revealed significantly lower promiscuity (i.e., number of confirmed off-targets) for compounds with MW > 700 and MW<200 for both categories. In addition, 15 internal small molecules with known off-target interactions were evaluated. For these compounds, the OTSA framework not only captured about 56.8% of in vitro confirmed off-target interactions, but also identified the right pharmacological targets for 14 compounds as one of the top scoring targets. In conclusion, the OTSA process demonstrates good predictive performance characteristics and represents an additional tool with utility during the lead optimization stage of the drug discovery process. Additionally, the computed physiochemical properties such as clogP (i.e., lipophilicity), molecular weight, pKa and logS (i.e., solubility) were found to be statistically different between the approved and discontinued drugs, but the internal compounds were close to the approved drugs space in most part.
Copyright © 2019 Rao, Gupta, Liguori, Hu, Huang, Mantena, Mittelstadt, Blomme and Van Vleet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Off-targets; gene expression; machine learning; pocket search; secondary pharmacology; toxicology

Year:  2019        PMID: 33693348      PMCID: PMC7931946          DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Big Data        ISSN: 2624-909X


  8 in total

1.  Increasing the Value of Data Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company Through In Silico Models.

Authors:  Alessandro Brigo; Doha Naga; Wolfgang Muster
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 2.  In silico toxicology: From structure-activity relationships towards deep learning and adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Jennifer Hemmerich; Gerhard F Ecker
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 3.  Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era.

Authors:  Petra Schneider; W Patrick Walters; Alleyn T Plowright; Norman Sieroka; Jennifer Listgarten; Robert A Goodnow; Jasmin Fisher; Johanna M Jansen; José S Duca; Thomas S Rush; Matthias Zentgraf; John Edward Hill; Elizabeth Krutoholow; Matthias Kohler; Jeff Blaney; Kimito Funatsu; Chris Luebkemann; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Innovative approaches for treatment of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Emel Rothzerg; Abigail L Pfaff; Sulev Koks
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-01-19

5.  A novel HSP90 inhibitor SL-145 suppresses metastatic triple-negative breast cancer without triggering the heat shock response.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Tae-Min Cho; Jung Min Park; Soeun Park; Minsu Park; Kee Dal Nam; Dongmi Ko; Juyeon Seo; Seongjae Kim; Eunsun Jung; Lee Farrand; Cong-Truong Nguyen; Van-Hai Hoang; Minh Thanh La; Jihyae Ann; Gibeom Nam; Hyun-Ju Park; Jeewoo Lee; Yoon-Jae Kim; Jae Hong Seo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 8.756

6.  A Molecular Modeling Approach to Identify Potential Antileishmanial Compounds Against the Cell Division Cycle (cdc)-2-Related Kinase 12 (CRK12) Receptor of Leishmania donovani.

Authors:  Emmanuel Broni; Samuel K Kwofie; Seth O Asiedu; Whelton A Miller; Michael D Wilson
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-18

7.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sdox, a Promising H2S-Releasing Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Chemoresistant Tumors.

Authors:  Petko Alov; Merilin Al Sharif; Denitsa Aluani; Konstantin Chegaev; Jelena Dinic; Aleksandra Divac Rankov; Miguel X Fernandes; Fabio Fusi; Alfonso T García-Sosa; Risto Juvonen; Magdalena Kondeva-Burdina; José M Padrón; Ilza Pajeva; Tania Pencheva; Adrián Puerta; Hannu Raunio; Chiara Riganti; Ivanka Tsakovska; Virginia Tzankova; Yordan Yordanov; Simona Saponara
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Challenges of non-clinical safety testing for biologics: A Report of the 9th BioSafe European Annual General Membership Meeting.

Authors:  Thomas Kissner; Guenter Blaich; Andreas Baumann; Sven Kronenberg; Adam Hey; Andrea Kiessling; Petra M Schmitt; Wouter Driessen; Chantal Carrez; Daniel Kramer; Jennifer Fretland; Wolfgang F Richter; Tobias Paehler; Ulrike Hopfer; Benno Rattel
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.