Literature DB >> 33692392

A network meta-analysis of the dose-response effects of lurasidone on acute schizophrenia.

Manit Srisurapanont1, Sirijit Suttajit2, Surinporn Likhitsathian2, Benchalak Maneeton2, Narong Maneeton2.   

Abstract

We compared the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of lurasidone at different doses to establish the dose-response relationships of lurasidone therapeutic and adverse effects in acute schizophrenia. Included trials were 4- to 16-week, fixed-dose, randomized controlled trials of lurasidone in adults with acute schizophrenia. Different doses of lurasidone, other antipsychotics, and placebo were considered as independent treatments. Apart from all-cause dropout rates, four therapeutic and four adverse outcomes were included in the frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA). Lurasidone 160, 120, 80, 40, and 20 mg/day were studied in ten trials of 3,366 adults with schizophrenia exacerbation. Lurasidone 160 mg/day reduced Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores significantly more than lurasidone 120, 80, 40, and 20 mg/day (mean differences = - 7.63, - 7.04, - 8.83, and - 12.25, respectively). All-cause dropout rates were significantly lower in participants receiving lurasidone 160 mg/day and 80 mg/day compared with those taking placebo. The half-maximal effective doses of lurasidone for PANSS total, PANSS positive, and MADRS score reductions were higher than 80 mg/day. The confidence of all NMA estimates was low or very low. Lurasidone 160 mg/day is currently the most efficacious and acceptable dose for acute schizophrenia. Its maximal effective doses may be higher than 160 mg/day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33692392      PMCID: PMC7946927          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84836-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  37 in total

1.  Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Jochem König; Ulrike Krahn; Harald Binder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of lurasidone and ziprasidone in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Authors:  Steven G Potkin; Masaaki Ogasa; Josephine Cucchiaro; Antony Loebel
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Jelena Savović; Matthew J Page; Roy G Elbers; Natalie S Blencowe; Isabelle Boutron; Christopher J Cates; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Mark S Corbett; Sandra M Eldridge; Jonathan R Emberson; Miguel A Hernán; Sally Hopewell; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Daniela R Junqueira; Peter Jüni; Jamie J Kirkham; Toby Lasserson; Tianjing Li; Alexandra McAleenan; Barnaby C Reeves; Sasha Shepperd; Ian Shrier; Lesley A Stewart; Kate Tilling; Ian R White; Penny F Whiting; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lieberman; T Scott Stroup; Joseph P McEvoy; Marvin S Swartz; Robert A Rosenheck; Diana O Perkins; Richard S E Keefe; Sonia M Davis; Clarence E Davis; Barry D Lebowitz; Joanne Severe; John K Hsiao
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo, and risperidone-controlled study of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: Results of an inconclusive 6-week trial.

Authors:  Teruhiko Higuchi; Masaomi Iyo; Jun Soo Kwon; Yuan-Hwa Chou; Hsing-Kang Chen; Jen-Yeu Chen; Tzu-Ting Chen; San-Yuan Huang; Jung-Sik Lee; Yuichi Saeki; Hisashi Tanaka; Tzong-Shi Wang; Bo-Jian Wu; Takao Katoh; Jun Ishigouoka
Journal:  Asia Pac Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Short-term efficacy and tolerability of lurasidone in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Dong-Bin Cai; Xin-Hu Yang; Lu Li; Qing-E Zhang; Chee H Ng; Gabor S Ungvari; Xian-Bin Li; Yu-Ping Ning; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  A 6-week, double-blind, placebo- and haloperidol-controlled, phase II study of lurasidone in patients with acute schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steven G Potkin; Tatsuya Kimura; John Guarino
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-12

8.  The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Georgia Salanti; Deborah M Caldwell; Anna Chaimani; Christopher H Schmid; Chris Cameron; John P A Ioannidis; Sharon Straus; Kristian Thorlund; Jeroen P Jansen; Cynthia Mulrow; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peter C Gøtzsche; Kay Dickersin; Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Ulrike Krahn; Harald Binder; Jochem König
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Julian P T Higgins; Theodoros Papakonstantinou; Anna Chaimani; Cinzia Del Giovane; Matthias Egger; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost analysis of lurasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents and adults within the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Amy Dymond; Daniela Afonso; Will Green
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.908

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.