Literature DB >> 24123165

Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons.

Jochem König1, Ulrike Krahn, Harald Binder.   

Abstract

Network meta-analysis techniques allow for pooling evidence from different studies with only partially overlapping designs for getting a broader basis for decision support. The results are network-based effect estimates that take indirect evidence into account for all pairs of treatments. The results critically depend on homogeneity and consistency assumptions, which are sometimes difficult to investigate. To support such evaluation, we propose a display of the flow of evidence and introduce new measures that characterize the structure of a mixed treatment comparison. Specifically, a linear fixed effects model for network meta-analysis is considered, where the network estimates for two treatments are linear combinations of direct effect estimates comparing these or other treatments. The linear coefficients can be seen as the generalization of weights known from classical meta-analysis. We summarize properties of these coefficients and display them as a weighted directed acyclic graph, representing the flow of evidence. Furthermore, measures are introduced that quantify the direct evidence proportion, the mean path length, and the minimal parallelism of mixed treatment comparisons. The graphical display and the measures are illustrated for two published network meta-analyses. In these applications, the proposed methods are seen to render transparent the process of data pooling in mixed treatment comparisons. They can be expected to be more generally useful for guiding and facilitating the validity assessment in network meta-analysis.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  hat matrix; mixed treatment comparison; network meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24123165     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  48 in total

1.  Fragility index of network meta-analysis with application to smoking cessation data.

Authors:  Aiwen Xing; Haitao Chu; Lifeng Lin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakob V E Gerstl; Luis F Rendon; Shane M Burke; Joanne Doucette; Rania A Mekary; Timothy R Smith
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Comparison of T790M Acquisition After Treatment With First- and Second-Generation Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Po-Chun Hsieh; Yao-Kuang Wu; Chun-Yao Huang; Mei-Chen Yang; Chan-Yen Kuo; I-Shiang Tzeng; Chou-Chin Lan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Joseph Lewis; Jamie Stokes; James R Gill; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Sensitivity of treatment recommendations to bias in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Phillippo; Sofia Dias; A E Ades; Vanessa Didelez; Nicky J Welton
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.483

6.  Empirical evaluation of SUCRA-based treatment ranks in network meta-analysis: quantifying robustness using Cohen's kappa.

Authors:  Caitlin H Daly; Binod Neupane; Joseph Beyene; Lehana Thabane; Sharon E Straus; Jemila S Hamid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Authors:  Toshi A Furukawa; Aya Suganuma; Edoardo G Ostinelli; Gerhard Andersson; Christopher G Beevers; Jason Shumake; Thomas Berger; Florien Willemijn Boele; Claudia Buntrock; Per Carlbring; Isabella Choi; Helen Christensen; Andrew Mackinnon; Jennifer Dahne; Marcus J H Huibers; David D Ebert; Louise Farrer; Nicholas R Forand; Daniel R Strunk; Iony D Ezawa; Erik Forsell; Viktor Kaldo; Anna Geraedts; Simon Gilbody; Elizabeth Littlewood; Sally Brabyn; Heather D Hadjistavropoulos; Luke H Schneider; Robert Johansson; Robin Kenter; Marie Kivi; Cecilia Björkelund; Annet Kleiboer; Heleen Riper; Jan Philipp Klein; Johanna Schröder; Björn Meyer; Steffen Moritz; Lara Bücker; Ove Lintvedt; Peter Johansson; Johan Lundgren; Jeannette Milgrom; Alan W Gemmill; David C Mohr; Jesus Montero-Marin; Javier Garcia-Campayo; Stephanie Nobis; Anna-Carlotta Zarski; Kathleen O'Moore; Alishia D Williams; Jill M Newby; Sarah Perini; Rachel Phillips; Justine Schneider; Wendy Pots; Nicole E Pugh; Derek Richards; Isabelle M Rosso; Scott L Rauch; Lisa B Sheeber; Jessica Smith; Viola Spek; Victor J Pop; Burçin Ünlü; Kim M P van Bastelaar; Sanne van Luenen; Nadia Garnefski; Vivian Kraaij; Kristofer Vernmark; Lisanne Warmerdam; Annemieke van Straten; Pavle Zagorscak; Christine Knaevelsrud; Manuel Heinrich; Clara Miguel; Andrea Cipriani; Orestis Efthimiou; Eirini Karyotaki; Pim Cuijpers
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 77.056

8.  Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eirini Karyotaki; Orestis Efthimiou; Clara Miguel; Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl; Toshi A Furukawa; Pim Cuijpers; Heleen Riper; Vikram Patel; Adriana Mira; Alan W Gemmil; Albert S Yeung; Alfred Lange; Alishia D Williams; Andrew Mackinnon; Anna Geraedts; Annemieke van Straten; Björn Meyer; Cecilia Björkelund; Christine Knaevelsrud; Christopher G Beevers; Cristina Botella; Daniel R Strunk; David C Mohr; David D Ebert; David Kessler; Derek Richards; Elizabeth Littlewood; Erik Forsell; Fan Feng; Fang Wang; Gerhard Andersson; Heather Hadjistavropoulos; Heleen Christensen; Iony D Ezawa; Isabella Choi; Isabelle M Rosso; Jan Philipp Klein; Jason Shumake; Javier Garcia-Campayo; Jeannette Milgrom; Jessica Smith; Jesus Montero-Marin; Jill M Newby; Juana Bretón-López; Justine Schneider; Kristofer Vernmark; Lara Bücker; Lisa B Sheeber; Lisanne Warmerdam; Louise Farrer; Manuel Heinrich; Marcus J H Huibers; Marie Kivi; Martin Kraepelien; Nicholas R Forand; Nicky Pugh; Nils Lindefors; Ove Lintvedt; Pavle Zagorscak; Per Carlbring; Rachel Phillips; Robert Johansson; Ronald C Kessler; Sally Brabyn; Sarah Perini; Scott L Rauch; Simon Gilbody; Steffen Moritz; Thomas Berger; Victor Pop; Viktor Kaldo; Viola Spek; Yvonne Forsell
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Po-Chih Chang; Kai-Hua Chen; Hong-Jie Jhou; Po-Huang Chen; Chih-Kun Huang; Cho-Hao Lee; Ting-Wei Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Do External Supports Improve Dynamic Balance in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability? A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsikopoulos; Konstantinos Sidiropoulos; Dimitrios Kitridis; Spencer M Cain Atc; Dimitrios Metaxiotis; Ashique Ali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.