Literature DB >> 29232338

INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS.

Stanislao Rizzo1, Ruggero Tartaro, Francesco Barca, Tomaso Caporossi, Daniela Bacherini, Fabrizio Giansanti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The inverted flap (IF) technique has recently been introduced in macular hole (MH) surgery. The IF technique has shown an increase of the success rate in the case of large MHs and in MHs associated with high myopia. This study reports the anatomical and functional results in a large series of patients affected by MH treated using pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or IF.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, consecutive, nonrandomized comparative study of patients affected by idiopathic or myopic MH treated using small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (25- or 23-gauge) between January 2011 and May 2016. The patients were divided into two groups according to the ILM removal technique (complete removal vs. IF). A subgroup analysis was performed according to the MH diameter (MH < 400 µm and MH ≥ 400 µm), axial length (AL < 26 mm and AL ≥ 26 mm), and the presence of chorioretinal atrophy in the macular area (present or absent).
RESULTS: We included 620 eyes of 570 patients affected by an MH, 300 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy and ILM peeling and 320 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy and IF. Overall, 84.94% of the patients had complete anatomical success characterized by MH closure after the operation. In particular, among the patients who underwent only ILM peeling the closure rate was 78.75%; among the patients who underwent the IF technique, it was 91.93% (P = 0.001); and among the patients affected by full-thickness MH ≥400 µm, success was achieved in 95.6% of the cases in the IF group and in 78.6% in the ILM peeling group (P = 0.001); among the patients with an axial length ≥26 mm, success was achieved in 88.4% of the cases in the IF group and in 38.9% in the ILM peeling group (P = 0.001). Average preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 0.77 (SD = 0.32) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/118 Snellen) in the peeling group and 0.74 (SD = 0.33) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/110 Snellen) in the IF group (P = 0.31). Mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 0.52 (SD = 0.42) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/66 Snellen) in the peeling group and 0.43 (SD = 0.31) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/53 Snellen) in the IF group (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy associated with the inverted ILM flap technique seems to be effective surgery for idiopathic and myopic large MHs, improving both functional and anatomical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29232338     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  35 in total

Review 1.  Internal limiting membrane flap technique in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Jie Luan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparisons of surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling in the myopic eyes with long to that with normal axial length.

Authors:  Gen Miura; Takayuki Baba; Tomoaki Tatsumi; Takehito Iwase; Hirotaka Yokouchi; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Eyes with Idiopathic Macular Holes that Underwent Surgery Using the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) Flap Technique Versus the Conventional ILM Peeling Technique.

Authors:  Yujie Yan; Tong Zhao; Chuan Sun; Haipeng Zhao; Xingwu Jia; Zhijun Wang
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Jay Jiyong Kwak; Suk Ho Byeon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Posterior scleral contraction to treat myopic traction maculopathy at different stages.

Authors:  Shuangqian Zhu; Anquan Xue; Haoyu Li; Jie Ye; Anpeng Pan; Jingwei Zheng; Guoxu Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Ji-Guo Yu; Jing Wang; Yi Xiang
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  MANAGEMENT OF LARGE OR RECURRENT MACULAR HOLES.

Authors:  Hailey Kay Robles-Holmes; Patrick C Staropoli; Nicolas Yannuzzi; Jayanth Sridhar
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2020-04-30

8.  Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in eyes with large idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: long-term functional and morphological outcomes.

Authors:  Nathalie Bleidißel; Julia Friedrich; Julian Klaas; Nikolaus Feucht; Chris Patrick Lohmann; Mathias Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  [Biomarkers in full-thickness and lamellar defects of the macula].

Authors:  M Maier; R Schumann; J Friedrich; J Klaas; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.174

10.  Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study.

Authors:  Vishal Agrawal; Khushbu Jindal; Yogendra Dhakad; Priyanka Rathore; Kamlesh Khilnani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.