Literature DB >> 33687519

Prognostic benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS): evaluation of the new risk stratification in the NSTEACS European guidelines.

Jesús Martinón-Martínez1, Belén Álvarez Álvarez2,3, Teba González Ferrero2,3, Federico García-Rodeja Arias2, Óscar Otero García2,3, Carla Cacho Antonio2,3, Charigan Abou Jokh Casas2,3, Pilar Zuazola3,4, Alberto Cordero3,4, David Escribano3,4, Belén Cid Alvarez2,3, Diego Iglesias Álvarez2,3, Rosa Agra Bermejo2,3, Pedro Rigueiro Veloso2,3, José María García Acuña2,3, Francisco Gude Sampedro5, José Ramón González Juanatey2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our work is to evaluate the prognostic benefit of an early invasive strategy in patients with high-risk NSTACS according to the recommendations of the 2020 clinical practice guidelines during long-term follow-up.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 6454 consecutive NSTEACS patients. We analyze the effects of early coronary angiography (< 24 h) in patients with: (a) GRACE risk score > 140 and (b) patients with "established NSTEMI" (non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction defined by an increase in troponins) or dynamic ST-T-segment changes with a GRACE risk score < 140.
RESULTS: From 2003 to 2017, 6454 patients with "new high-risk NSTEACS" were admitted, and 6031 (93.45%) of these underwent coronary angiography. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the long-term cumulative probability of being free of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE differed significantly due to an early coronary intervention in patients with NSTEACS and GRACE > 140 [HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.57-0.67), HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.56-0.68), HR 0.57 (IC 95% 0.53-0.61), respectively]. In patients with NSTEACS and GRACE < 140 with established NSTEMI or ST/T-segment changes, the benefit of the early invasive strategy is only observed in the reduction of MACE [HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.56-0.68)], but not for total mortality [HR 0.96 (IC 95% 0.78-1.2)] and cardiovascular mortality [HR 0.96 (IC 95% 0.75-1.24)].
CONCLUSIONS: An early invasive management is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE in NSTEACS with high GRACE risk score. However, this benefit is less evident in the subgroup of patients with a GRACE score < 140 with established NSTEMI or ST/T-segment changes.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early coronary intervention; GRACE; Guidelines; Long-term outcomes; NSTEACS; NSTEMI

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33687519     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-021-01829-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  11 in total

Review 1.  Optimal timing of an invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Alexander Jobs; Shamir R Mehta; Gilles Montalescot; Eric Vicaut; Arnoud W J Van't Hof; Erik A Badings; Franz-Josef Neumann; Adnan Kastrati; Alessandro Sciahbasi; Paul-Georges Reuter; Frédéric Lapostolle; Aleksandra Milosevic; Goran Stankovic; Dejan Milasinovic; Reinhard Vonthein; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Optimal timing of coronary angiography and potential intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis; George C M Siontis; Adnan Kastrati; Arnoud W J van't Hof; Franz-Josef Neumann; Konstantinos C M Siontis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Shamir R Mehta; Christopher B Granger; William E Boden; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Jean-Pierre Bassand; David P Faxon; Rizwan Afzal; Susan Chrolavicius; Sanjit S Jolly; Petr Widimsky; Alvaro Avezum; Hans-Jurgen Rupprecht; Jun Zhu; Jacques Col; Madhu K Natarajan; Craig Horsman; Keith A A Fox; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Klaus F Kofoed; Henning Kelbæk; Peter Riis Hansen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Dan Høfsten; Lene Kløvgaard; Lene Holmvang; Steffen Helqvist; Erik Jørgensen; Søren Galatius; Frants Pedersen; Lia Bang; Kari Saunamaki; Peter Clemmensen; Jesper J Linde; Merete Heitmann; Olav Wendelboe Nielsen; Ilan E Raymond; Ole Peter Kristiansen; Ida Hastrup Svendsen; Jan Bech; Maria Helena Dominguez Vall-Lamora; Charlotte Kragelund; Thomas Fritz Hansen; Jens Dahlgaard Hove; Tem Jørgensen; Gitte G Fornitz; Rolf Steffensen; Birgit Jurlander; Jawdat Abdulla; Stig Lyngbæk; Hanne Elming; Susette Krohn Therkelsen; Ulrik Abildgaard; Jan Skov Jensen; Gunnar Gislason; Lars V Køber; Thomas Engstrøm
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Relation of timing of cardiac catheterization to outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris enrolled in the multinational global registry of acute coronary events.

Authors:  Gilles Montalescot; Omar H Dabbous; Michael J Lim; Marcus D Flather; Rajendra H Mehta
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Paul A Gurbel; Felicita Andreotti; Udaya Tantry; Young-Hoon Jeong; Marek Kozinski; Thomas Engstrøm; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Waclaw Kochman; Diego Ardissino; Elvin Kedhi; Gregg W Stone; Jacek Kubica
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Immediate versus deferred coronary angioplasty in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  R K Riezebos; E Ronner; E Ter Bals; T Slagboom; P C Smits; J M ten Berg; F Kiemeneij; G Amoroso; M S Patterson; M J Suttorp; J G P Tijssen; G J Laarman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Timing of Angiography and Outcomes in High-Risk Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Managed Invasively: Insights From the TAO Trial (Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome With Otamixaban).

Authors:  Pierre Deharo; Gregory Ducrocq; Christoph Bode; Marc Cohen; Thomas Cuisset; Shamir R Mehta; Charles Pollack; Stephen D Wiviott; Yedid Elbez; Marc S Sabatine; Philippe Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gilles Montalescot; Guillaume Cayla; Jean-Philippe Collet; Simon Elhadad; Farzin Beygui; Hervé Le Breton; Rémi Choussat; Florence Leclercq; Johanne Silvain; François Duclos; Mounir Aout; Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé; Olivier Barthélémy; Grégory Ducrocq; Anne Bellemain-Appaix; Laurent Payot; Philippe-Gabriel Steg; Patrick Henry; Christian Spaulding; Eric Vicaut
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.