Literature DB >> 15950559

Relation of timing of cardiac catheterization to outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris enrolled in the multinational global registry of acute coronary events.

Gilles Montalescot1, Omar H Dabbous, Michael J Lim, Marcus D Flather, Rajendra H Mehta.   

Abstract

We assessed whether timing of catheterization is associated with the type of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and/or outcome in patients who were enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Overall, 8,853 patients who had unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction were categorized according to timing of catheterization: expeditive (<24 hours), early (24 to 48 hours), and delayed (>48 hours). Patients in the delayed group were older, more frequently had previous myocardial infarction or stroke, and had a higher risk score compared with those in the expeditive and early groups (all p < or =0.001). Killip class IV at admission, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and Q waves after the index electrocardiogram were more common in the expeditive group (all p <0.0001). Patients in the expeditive and early groups were treated more aggressively with medications than were those in the delayed group. The in-hospital composite end point (death, stroke, or major bleed) occurred most frequently in the expeditive group (expeditive 6.6%, early 3.9%, delayed 5.1%, p = 0.0005), as did in-hospital death (expeditive 3.5%, early 1.4%, delayed 2.0%, p <0.0001). The highest incidence of death during follow-up occurred in the delayed group (3.8% delayed vs 2.8% expeditive/early, p = 0.0210). Multivariate regression analysis suggested that expeditive catheterization was related to in-hospital death and death from time of catheterization to 6 months. We conclude that expeditive catheterization is associated with unstable presenting features that contribute significantly to the higher risk of death and death or myocardial infarction in hospital compared with patients who undergo later catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15950559     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

Review 1.  Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Prognostic benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS): evaluation of the new risk stratification in the NSTEACS European guidelines.

Authors:  Jesús Martinón-Martínez; Belén Álvarez Álvarez; Teba González Ferrero; Federico García-Rodeja Arias; Óscar Otero García; Carla Cacho Antonio; Charigan Abou Jokh Casas; Pilar Zuazola; Alberto Cordero; David Escribano; Belén Cid Alvarez; Diego Iglesias Álvarez; Rosa Agra Bermejo; Pedro Rigueiro Veloso; José María García Acuña; Francisco Gude Sampedro; José Ramón González Juanatey
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Evaluation of early interventional treatment opportunity of the elderly & high-risk patients with non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Liu; Lipei Zhao; Yibo Li; Zhifang Wang; Lingling Liu; Fucheng Zhang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.