Fatemeh Davari Tanha1,2, Elham Feizabad3,4, Maryam Vasheghani Farahani2, Hoora Amuzegar2, Behnaz Moradi5, Saghar Samimi Sadeh6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Vali- asr Health Research Center, Vali- asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: elhamfeizabad@gmail.com. 4. Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Radiology, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 6. Department of Anesthesiology, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
In women of the reproductive age, uterine fibroids
(leiomyoma) are monoclonal is a benign and most
common gynecological tumor that depends on hormonal changes (1-5). These tumors affect 25-80% of
reproductive age women depending on their demographic characteristic [race, age, and body mass index
(BMI)], past medical history [hypertension (HTN),
infertility, and premenopausal period], nutritional
habits (use of food additive or soy bean milk) and
family history (6-9).It has been reported that some intrinsic abnormalities
during the menstrual period including abnormal myometrial receptors for estrogen and hormonal changes or altered responses to ischemic injury, may be accountable
for the start of (epi) genetic changes found in uterine myomas (10, 11).Most uterine fibroids are asymptomatic, but they can
cause symptoms, according to their size and location, like
abnormal or heavy menstrual bleeding, iron deficiency
anemia, bloating, constipation, urinary symptoms, pelvic
pain, problems in intercourse, or pregnancy complications like recurrent miscarriage, premature labor and infertility (5, 12-16).Symptomatic tumors are mainly treated by surgery.
In addition to high direct costs of fibroma surgery treatments, these treatments are not suitable for women
who wish to maintain fertility. However, nonsurgical
treatments are approved just for short-term treatment
and have their own disadvantages (5, 17). On the other hand, some therapeutic agents like gonadotropin
hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, oral
GnRH antagonist (Elagolix), selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM), vitamin D (vitD) and green
tea extracts are candidates to blunt the fibroid growth
(18, 19).Of medical therapeutic agents, vitD is a safe, inexpensive and available treatment without
major side effects in therapeutic dose, which is assumed theoretically as an antitumor agent
(20). It modulates gene (like cell growth and division genes and encoding estrogen and
progesterone receptors genes) expression via vitD receptor and can result in regulation of
cellular proliferation and cellular differentiation, stimulation of apoptosis that finally
results in inhibition of malignant transformation and prevention of tumor cells
proliferation (21, 22). Exposure to 1α, 1,25(OH)2 D3 inhibits the
growth of melanoma, and lung, colon, prostate and breast cancer (23-27). So, vitD can be
assumed as a preventive tool for high-risk group of patients that are susceptible to uterine
fibroma (28).Since, there is a high prevalence of vitD deficiency
in Iran, there are interesting articles about the theoretical role of vitD in growth inhibition of uterine
fibroid and the present data are inadequate to show
the role of vitD as a medical therapy for the treatment of uterine fibroids, there is a need for a clinical trial that can assess inhibitory effects of vitD on
the uterine fibroid size. Therefore, we conducted a
randomized blinded clinical trial for evaluating the
effects of vitD on the leiomyoma mean diameter in
women with at least one uterine fibroid>10 mm referred to gynecology clinic in Tehran University of
Medical Sciences’ Hospital.
Materials and Methods
This randomized blinded clinical trial was conducted
between August 2017 and September 2018 in a tertiary
university-based hospital.All reproductive age women who referred to gynecologic clinic and had at least one uterine fibroid>10
mm in transvaginal ultrasound, were evaluated using
a blood sample for vitD levels. According to the Endocrine Society Practice Guideline on vitD status, deficiency was defined as vitD<20 ng/ml, insufficiency
as 21-29 ng/ml, and sufficiency as at least 30 ng/ml
(29).All the patients with uterine fibroid and insufficient levels of vitD (21-29 ng/ml) were
included in the present study. Due to ethical concerns, patients with deficient levels of
vitD (<20 ng/ml) were excluded from the study and received vitD as treatment. Other
exclusion criteria were refusing follow-up visit or being candidate for hysterectomy or
myomectomy due to related symptoms of uterine fibroid like bleeding, pain, pregnancy,
menopause, use of oral contraceptive during the last 3 months, consuming vitD supplements
during the last 3 months, having BMI of <18 or >30 kg/m2 (30) and
malignancyTwo-hundred and forty women with uterine fibroid
were referred to the clinic. Of them, 20 patients had
sufficient levels of vitD, and seven patients underwent
surgery in the control group and eight patients in the
intervention group and one woman with unwanted
pregnancy was excluded from the control group during the study. To tally 204 women, 102 in each group,
completed the study protocol and data was analyzed
(according to intention to treat analysis) (Fig.1).
Fig.1
Consort flow diagram of study.
The vitD level was measured by a Kit (Narvanteb
Company Kit, Iran) based on a chemiluminescence
technology. Each patient had two blood samples, one
in the initiation of the study and one after 8 weeks of
observation or treatment with vitD in the same laboratory following the same method.According to the sample size formula (α=0.05,
β=90%, r=-0.31), we needed 212 patients for this study
(106 patients for each groups) (30). Randomization of
the patients was done based on block randomization
by a computer program (Random Allocation Software)
that was performed by a secretory that was blinded to
the study group.The uterine fibroid size was measured by a radiologist who was experienced in gynecologic ultrasound
in the initiation of study and after 8 weeks of treatment with vitD supplement for both study groups.
The radiologist was blinded to the grouping. Uterine
fibroid was defined as well-defined, hypoechoic, heterogenous mass. Regarding the anatomical site in the
uterus, patients divided as subserosal if the development was in the outer portion of uterus, intramural if
the leiomyoma localized in the myometrium, and submucosal if the development was in to uterine cavity.
The leiomyoma was measured by three perpendicular
diameter and the mean of them was calculated. The
scans were performed by a 5.5-MHZ probe of Voluson
730 GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI.The intervention group with insufficient levels of
vitD, received vitD 50000 IU (D-Vigel 50000, DaanaPharma Company, Iran) orally once per a week for 8
weeks and then a blood sample for vitD levels measurement was collected and the second transvaginal ultrasound was performed (1 to 2 weeks after the last dose
of vitD). The control group with insufficient levels of
vitD was observed for 8 weeks without vitD supplementation and 1 to 2 weeks after that the second blood
sample was collected and transvaginal ultrasound was
performed, then they received vitD supplement to reach
sufficient vitD concentration.Finally, variations in the mean diameter of uterine
fibroid and vitD levels were measured and compared
between thetwogroup as the primary outcomes.Consort flow diagram of study.
Statistical analysis
All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS
version 24.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Quantitative data
are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical data are expressed as frequency and percentage. The
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the distribution of the data. Independent samples, one-sample
t test and Crosstabs were used in assessing the variable
relationship. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical considerations
The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee
(IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1396.2701) and the trial was registered as IRCT201703122576N15. All the patients signed
the informed consent before being enrolled in to the study
groups.
Results
Totally, 204 women, 102 in each group, completed the study protocol, and data were
analyzed. The mean age and BMI in the control and intervention group were 37.21 and 34.89
years and 26.71 and 25.63 kg/m2 respectively. About 6.86% of women had a history
of infertility in the intervention group versus 5.88% in the control group. The group were
not statistically different in terms of age, BMI and history of infertility (Table 1).
Table 1
Demographic data of women in the two groups
Variable
Control group
Interventiongroup
P value
Age (Y)
37.2 ± 91.13
34.89 ± 10.10
0.080
BMI (kg/m2)
26.7 ± 2.51
25.63 ± 3.31
0.090
History of infertility
6
7
0.770
Vitamin D level before (ng/ml)
23.62 ± 4.80
23.20 ± 4.64
0.520
Vitamin D level after (ng/ml)
22.72 ± 5.21
28.56 ± 5.04
0.001
Mean leiomyoma diameter before (mm)
41.98 ± 11.31
43.09 ± 14.36
0.180
Mean leiomyoma diameter after (mm)
47.81 ± 14.13
42.61 ± 15.53
0.018
Subserosal leiomyoma
44 (43.14)
50 (49.02)
0.561
Intramural leiomyoma
45 (44.12)
43 (42.16)
Submucosal leiomyoma
13 (12.75)
9 (8.82)
Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). BMI; Body mass index.
The mean vitD levels in the control and intervention
group was 23.62 and 23.20 ng/ml, respectively which
was not statistically different. At the end of the study, the
mean vitD levels in the control and intervention group
was 22.72 and 28.56 ng/ml, respectively.The mean uterine fibroids diameter in the control
group before and after the study was 41.98 ± 5.25 and
47.813 ± 3.42 mm, respectively. The mean uterine
fibroid size increased for 14.5% in control group.
Mean vitD levels before and after the study were 23.6
and 22.7 ng/ml, respectively in the control group. It
showed 0.9 unit or 4% decrement; the levels were
assumed stable, if the laboratory error was considered
(Fig.2).
Fig.2
Diagram of variations in the mean diameter of uterine fibroid
in the two groups.
Demographic data of women in the two groupsData are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). BMI; Body mass index.Regarding the site of uterine fibroids in the control
group, 43.14% of them were subserosal, 44.12%
intramural and 12.75% submucosal. In the intervention
group, 49.02% were subserosal, 42.16% intramural, and
8.82% submucosal uterine fibroid.Diagram of variations in the mean diameter of uterine fibroid
in the two groups.The most common type of uterine fibroids in the control
group was intramural followed by subserosal, versus the
intervention group in which, the subserosal was the most
common type followed by intramural. The submucosal
leiomyoma had the lowest incidence in both groups.The mean uterine fibroid size in the intervention group
before and after the study was 43.09 ± 14.36 and 42.61
±15.53 mm, respectively. The size decreased to 0.48 mm.
Mean vitD levels before and after intervention qwew23.2
and 28.5 ng/ml, respectively. It showed 5.36 unit or 24%
increase in vitD levels (Fig.3).
Fig.3
Diagram shows vitamin D levels in both group, before and after
the study.
The change in the size of the uterine fibroid between the
intervention and control group had a significant difference,
the mean changes in size was 5.83 mm in the control group
compare to - 0.48 mm in the intervention group (P=0.001).
The control group had increases in size versus a slight
decrease in the intervention group (Table 2).
Table 2
Comparison of uterine fibroid size and vitD level changes in
the two groups after the intervention
Groups
Uterine fibroid size (mm)
% Size change (ng/ml)
Vitamin D
% Size change
Control n=102
5.833 ± 0.642
14.5
-0.902 ± 1.29
-4
Intervention n=102
-0.480 ± 0.246
-2.5
5.362 ± 2.567
24
P value
<0.001
<0.001
Data are presented as mean ± SD or %.
Diagram shows vitamin D levels in both group, before and after
the study.Comparison of uterine fibroid size and vitD level changes in
the two groups after the interventionData are presented as mean ± SD or %.The mean uterine fibroid size changes in the control
group regarding the type of uterine fibroid was 5.15,7.33,
and 2.92 mm for subserosal, intramural, and submucosal,
respectively. Maximum change in mean leiomyoma
diameter was found for intramural followed by subserosal.The mean uterine fibroid size changes in the intervention
group was 0.3 mm decrease for intramural and subserosal
but for submucosal 2.33 mm decrease in size occurred
after the intervention.For evaluating the error of measurement of uterine
fibroid diameter, another analysis was done and it showed
that the mean change was 4.54 and -0.17 mm for the
control and intervention group, respectively (P=0.001).
Discussion
This trial showed that vitD given to at a therapeutic
dose vitD insufficient women, can inhibit the leiomyoma
growth which was detectable by ultrasound; however,
women in the control group (who did not receive vitD
treatment) had some growth in leiomyoma size.There are some articles about the role of vitD as antitumoral agent (7, 9, 17, 19, 28). The
receptor of vitD is a nuclear receptor which is activated by 1, 25(OH)2
D3 , resulting in modulation of the transcription rate of target gene (like
cell growth and division genes and estrogen and progesterone receptors encoding genes) (31).
These functions are the orgin of anti-tumor effects of 1,25(OH)2 D3 on
uterine fibroid.Accumulating evidence suggests that the metabolic
pathways of vitD may play a key role in the developing of several gynecological diseases. Indeed, the vitD
receptor (VDR)-mediated signaling pathways and vitD
levels seem to (deeply) affect the risk of polycystic ovary
syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, infertility, ovarian and
even breast cancer, and affect a woman’s response to
menopausal status (32-35).Also another study evaluated vitD concentration and
uterine fibroid in premenopausal women by ultrasound
(36). About 90% of black women and 50% of white
women had insufficient vitD levels. These women had
62% chance of uterine fibroid in comparison with women
who had sufficient vitD concentrations.The study was
showed that sufficient levels of vitD are associated with
decreased risk of liomyoma. VitD concentration was
checked from stored plasma of patients and 620 blacks
and 416 whites were evaluated. Their samples were
randomly chosen from National Institue of Environmental
Health Sciences Uterine Fibroid Study during 1996-
1999. Women were asked regarding sun exposure by a
questionaire that evaluted sun exposure>1 hour/dayAnother cross-sectional study (37) showed that 52
women with uterine fibroid diagnosed by magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound had vitD
level<30 ng/ml. The study showed that 85% of women
with documented uterine fibroid were vitD deficient and
that confirmed our study results.Another prospective cross-sectional study in Turkish
premenopausal women showed that traditional costume,
being a house wife and low eduction are risk factor for vitD
deficiency. Also, the study showed that vitD defficiency
in women with leiomyoma was more prevalent versus in
women without leiomyoma (38).Moreover, a study by Mitro and Zota (39) in 3590
women with uterine leiomyomata, in the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey indicated that there was
no relationship between vitD and odds of uterine fibroids.
Although, subgroup analysis performed on the same
data showed that insufficient serum vitD was associated
with significantly higher odds of uterine fibroids in white
women but not in black patients.In vivo vitD production is affected by sun exposure, geographical
locations, latitude, season, weather condition, clothing and use of sunscreens have an
important effect on vitD level. Indoor activity and dark skin are risk factor for black
house-wife women for having fibroma (28, 40).The strengths of our study were the design as a randomized
clinical trial and accurate inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The limitation of the present study is the short follow-up
period (i.e.8 weeks). We recommend a clinical trial with
longer period of follow-up (i.e. 12 months) for further
measurement of leiomyoma size. Another limitation was
that due to ethical considerations, we could not include
women with vitD<20 ng/ml in the study and compare the
effect of treatment on these women with the control group,
and the reluctance of patients to participate in the study
were another limitations of this study
Conclusion
Our results showed that vitD supplementation prevents
fibroid growth. It seems that vitD supplement is a simple,
safe and inexpensive modality for leiomyoma growth
prevention.
Authors: Michał Ciebiera; Marta Włodarczyk; Magdalena Ciebiera; Kornelia Zaręba; Krzysztof Łukaszuk; Grzegorz Jakiel Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 5.923