Literature DB >> 33686144

The effect of flue-curing procedure on the dynamic change of microbial diversity of tobaccos.

Binbin Hu1, Kaiyuan Gu1, Jiangshiqi Gong1, Ke Zhang1, Dan Chen1, Xian He1, Yi Chen1, Kaixian Gao2, Yan Jin1, Kun Huang1, Yanmei Zhu2, Congming Zou3.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to explore the effect of flue-curing procedure on the diversity of microbial communities in tobaccos and the dynamic change of compositions of microbial communities in the flue-curing process. It expects to provide a theoretical basis for the application of microbes in tobacco leaves and a theoretical basis and idea for optimization of the flue-curing technologies. By investigating tobacco variety K326, the tests were carried out for comparing the conventional flue-curing procedure and dry-ball temperature set and wet-ball temperature degradation flue-curing procedure. Based on the culture-independent approach and high-throughput sequencing procedure, the relationship between the flue-curing procedure for tobaccos and microbial communities in tobaccos was revealed by measuring the dynamic change of microbial communities. The results indicated that:(1) Relative to surface wiping method, washing method was more suitable for the sampling of microbes on the surface of tobacco leaves; (2) Dry-ball temperature set and wet-ball temperature degradation flue-curing procedure was more favorable for maintaining the microbial diversity of tobaccos; (3) Relative to bacteria of the tobaccos, the succession rule of the fungal communities in tobaccos was relatively steady; (4)Compared with bacterial community diversity, the fungal community diversity presented an obvious negative correlation with temperature and humidity during the flue-curing process. (5) The function of bacterial communities in tobaccos matched with the material transformation law of tobaccos, having a direct correlation on the flue-curing process. In short, Dry-ball temperature set and wet-ball temperature degradation flue-curing procedure can more favorably maintain the microbial diversity of tobaccos; moreover, the function of the tobacco system involved in microbes in tobaccos was closely related to the material transformation law of tobaccos in the flue-curing process. It validated that the bacteria in tobaccos play an important role in the flue-curing process of tobaccos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686144      PMCID: PMC7940495          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84875-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  12 in total

Review 1.  Culture-independent methods for studying environmental microorganisms: methods, application, and perspective.

Authors:  Can Su; Liping Lei; Yanqing Duan; Ke-Qin Zhang; Jinkui Yang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Bacterial diversities on unaged and aging flue-cured tobacco leaves estimated by 16S rRNA sequence analysis.

Authors:  Jingwen Huang; Jinkui Yang; Yanqing Duan; Wen Gu; Xiaowei Gong; Wei Zhe; Can Su; Ke-Qin Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons.

Authors:  Brian J Haas; Dirk Gevers; Ashlee M Earl; Mike Feldgarden; Doyle V Ward; Georgia Giannoukos; Dawn Ciulla; Diana Tabbaa; Sarah K Highlander; Erica Sodergren; Barbara Methé; Todd Z DeSantis; Joseph F Petrosino; Rob Knight; Bruce W Birren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy.

Authors:  Qiong Wang; George M Garrity; James M Tiedje; James R Cole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies.

Authors:  Tanja Magoč; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Accessing to the Nicotiana tabacum leaf antimicrobial activity: In-silico and in-vitro investigations.

Authors:  Yanelis Capdesuñer; Jorge García-Brizuela; Hans Peter Mock; Karel Vives Hernández; Martha Hernández de la Torre; Cosme E Santiesteban-Toca
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.270

7.  The rhizosphere signature on the cell motility, biofilm formation and secondary metabolite production of a plant-associated Lysobacter strain.

Authors:  Francesca Brescia; Martina Marchetti-Deschmann; Rita Musetti; Michele Perazzolli; Ilaria Pertot; Gerardo Puopolo
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.415

8.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Contemporaneous radiations of fungi and plants linked to symbiosis.

Authors:  François Lutzoni; Michael D Nowak; Michael E Alfaro; Valérie Reeb; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Michael Krug; A Elizabeth Arnold; Louise A Lewis; David L Swofford; David Hibbett; Khidir Hilu; Timothy Y James; Dietmar Quandt; Susana Magallón
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics of fungal communities and the sources of mold contamination in mildewed tobacco leaves stored under different climatic conditions.

Authors:  Jiaxi Zhou; Yu Cheng; Lifei Yu; Jian Zhang; Xiao Zou
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.813

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.