Literature DB >> 33683364

Protein quality control degron-containing substrates are differentially targeted in the cytoplasm and nucleus by ubiquitin ligases.

Christopher M Hickey1, Carolyn Breckel1, Mengwen Zhang2, William C Theune3, Mark Hochstrasser1,4.   

Abstract

Intracellular proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome system regulates numerous processes and contributes to protein quality control (PQC) in all eukaryotes. Covalent attachment of ubiquitin to other proteins is specified by the many ubiquitin ligases (E3s) expressed in cells. Here we determine the E3s in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that function in degradation of proteins bearing various PQC degradation signals (degrons). The E3 Ubr1 can function redundantly with several E3s, including nuclear-localized San1, endoplasmic reticulum/nuclear membrane-embedded Doa10, and chromatin-associated Slx5/Slx8. Notably, multiple degrons are targeted by more ubiquitylation pathways if directed to the nucleus. Degrons initially assigned as exclusive substrates of Doa10 were targeted by Doa10, San1, and Ubr1 when directed to the nucleus. By contrast, very short hydrophobic degrons-typical targets of San1-are shown here to be targeted by Ubr1 and/or San1, but not Doa10. Thus, distinct types of PQC substrates are differentially recognized by the ubiquitin system in a compartment-specific manner. In human cells, a representative short hydrophobic degron appended to the C-terminus of GFP-reduced protein levels compared with GFP alone, consistent with a recent study that found numerous natural hydrophobic C-termini of human proteins can act as degrons. We also report results of bioinformatic analyses of potential human C-terminal degrons, which reveal that most peptide substrates of Cullin-RING ligases (CRLs) are of low hydrophobicity, consistent with previous data showing CRLs target degrons with specific sequences. These studies expand our understanding of PQC in yeast and human cells, including the distinct but overlapping PQC E3 substrate specificity of the cytoplasm and nucleus.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  degron; proteasome; protein degradation; protein quality control; ubiquitin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683364      PMCID: PMC8045714          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyaa031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  76 in total

1.  Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation.

Authors:  N F Bence; R M Sampat; R R Kopito
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Application and analysis of the GFPu family of ubiquitin-proteasome system reporters.

Authors:  Neil F Bence; Eric J Bennett; Ron R Kopito
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Degradation signals for ubiquitin system proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Gilon; O Chomsky; R G Kulka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus.

Authors:  Richard G Gardner; Zara W Nelson; Daniel E Gottschling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy.

Authors:  Christian Pohl; Ivan Dikic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method.

Authors:  R Daniel Gietz; Robin A Woods
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Previously unknown role for the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1 in endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation.

Authors:  Alexandra Stolz; Stefanie Besser; Heike Hottmann; Dieter H Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Degradation elements coincide with cofactor binding sites in a short-lived transcription factor.

Authors:  Christopher M Hickey
Journal:  Cell Logist       Date:  2016-03-08

9.  Distinct proteostasis circuits cooperate in nuclear and cytoplasmic protein quality control.

Authors:  Rahul S Samant; Christine M Livingston; Emily M Sontag; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Type II Hsp40 Sis1 cooperates with Hsp70 and the E3 ligase Ubr1 to promote degradation of terminally misfolded cytosolic protein.

Authors:  Daniel W Summers; Katie J Wolfe; Hong Yu Ren; Douglas M Cyr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  The San1 Ubiquitin Ligase Avidly Recognizes Misfolded Proteins through Multiple Substrate Binding Sites.

Authors:  Rebeca Ibarra; Heather R Borror; Bryce Hart; Richard G Gardner; Gary Kleiger
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 2.  Quality control of cytoplasmic proteins inside the nucleus.

Authors:  Lion Borgert; Swadha Mishra; Fabian den Brave
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.155

Review 3.  SUMO-Targeted Ubiquitin Ligases and Their Functions in Maintaining Genome Stability.

Authors:  Ya-Chu Chang; Marissa K Oram; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Ubiquitin Ligase Redundancy and Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Localization in Yeast Protein Quality Control.

Authors:  Carolyn Allain Breckel; Mark Hochstrasser
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.