Literature DB >> 33682810

Risk management during COVID-19: safety procedures for otolaryngologists.

Giacomo Spinato1, Piergiorgio Gaudioso2, Paolo Boscolo Rizzo3, Cristoforo Fabbris4, Anna Menegaldo5, Francesca Mularoni6, Bhuvanesh Singh7, Antonino Maniaci8, Salvatore Cocuzza9, Daniele Frezza10.   

Abstract

The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV2 has stressed health care systems worldwide. The high volume of patients, combined with an increased need for intensive care and potential transmission, has forced reorganization of hospitals and care delivery models. In this article, are presented approaches to minimize risk to Otolaryngologists during their patients infected with COVID-19 care. We performed a narrative literature review among PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science electronic databases, searching for studies on SARS-CoV2 and Risk Management. Standard operating procedures have been adapted both for facilities and for health care workers, including the development of well-defined and segregated patient care areas for treating those affected by COVID-19. Personal protective equipment (PPEs) availability and adequate healthcare providers training on their use should be ensured. Preventive measures are especially important in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, as the exposure to saliva suspensions, droplets and aerosols are increased in the upper aero-digestive tract routine examination. Morever, the frequent invasive procedures, such as laryngoscopy, intubation or tracheotomy placement and care, represent a high risk of contracting COVID-19.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33682810      PMCID: PMC7975934          DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.11281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed us an unprecedented reflection and changing of hygienic habits and sanitation procedures, outside and inside the hospital. Italy has been one of the first countries to face this challenge. Fatalities from patients who tested positive for COVID-19 in Italy are summarized in the following chart, based on data from the Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS) (Table 1) (1). An increased number of fatalities in a country is likely related to differences in the number of performed swab tests, the high number of older people (Italy is the second in the world after Japan), and high density of positive patients, with small areas experiencing larger clusters (as happened in Lombardia, in northern Italy). Overall, about 40% of Italian doctors who died were family doctors, while 25% were specialists with a high risk of infection due to involvement of the respiratory tract and mucosa. The most involved specialities comprehend pneumology, anesthesiology, infectious disease, otolaryngology, ophthalmology and dentistry (1, 2). The transmission of SARS-CoV2 occurs through close contact (less than 2 meters) by exposure to droplets expelled by coughing, sneezing, or speaking. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cannot penetrate the skin, but it can penetrate all exposed mucous membranes, including the eyes (3-5). The experience gained during the pandemic provided evidence about risk management (6,7, 38). Anyway, no unique consensus for diagnostic and management has been internationally provided. This is reflected in the absence of unique and internationally approved indications for an oropharyngeal swab, the actual diagnostic gold standard. A European and Global vision is still lacking, and management is left to National Health Institutes or single Centers administration. By considering the current epidemiological situation and infection trends, controlling the COVID-19 pandemic requires the adoption of precise risk management strategies aimed to reduce contamination between infected individuals and health workers (9).

Risk management

Proactive steps must be taken in anticipation of the trigger and adverse events, represented by a spread of contagion within the hospital among patients, health workers and caregivers (10). Risk management strategies should follow Reason’s “Swiss cheese model” (Fig. 1) to identify and correct systematic and procedural failures. Assessing these risks permits to recognize barriers, including the appropriate removal of PPE, which can prevent the occurrence of a triggered adverse event (11).
Figure 1.

Modification of Reason’s diagram according to the clinical risk of harm for COVID-19 patients and for contamination of healthcare staff, as obtained by sum of latent and active errors.

Modification of Reason’s diagram according to the clinical risk of harm for COVID-19 patients and for contamination of healthcare staff, as obtained by sum of latent and active errors. Latent errors depend on structural and management filter errors such as lack of strategic planning for the COVID-19 emergency, according to reorganization of logistics, activities and procedures and staff training on rules and the use of PPEs. Active errors are performed individually by the operator, i.e., incorrect use of the PPE devices and their removal not in accordance with the clean and the dirty identified paths, as well as incorrect compliance with the outpatient and surgical procedures rules that COVID-19 ENT patients impose and are described in this article. Reorganization of hospitals and clinics is essential during the pandemic. In order to reduce interpersonal contacts, social distancing measures should be applied in ENT wards, including limitation of hospitalization to selected surgeries and urgencies, after assessing COVID-19 negativity with double negative RNA- PCR (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal) swab tests, and respecting the adequate measures of prevention in facilities (room ventilation, the distance between beds). The access to the ward should be limited to one caregiver only in case of minor or not self-sufficient patients. Moreover, telephone interviews should be preferred both with patients, whenever an immediate physical examination is not essential and with relatives of hospitalized patients (4, 10, 16, 17,18). Moreover, health care staff should be aware of the correct use of PPEs as fundamental instruments to protect themselves and patients. They should be trained on the correct procedure, as described in WHO guidelines, to appropriately dress and, even more critical, remove PPEs without contamination in specific areas under the supervision of trained staff. Moreover, healthcare workers suspected to be exposed or infected will need to be quarantined and treated with established procedures. Preventive and control measures are essential: maintaining good hand hygiene; avoiding contact with eyes, mouth, or nose; and above all, inside the hospital, the use of PPEs including gloves, medical masks, goggles/face shields and gowns in order to protect the health care team and the patients (4, 15). During April, the stock of PPE, in particular masks and respirators, was often insufficient to meet the need because of the limited capacity of production and the massive demand due to misinformation and panic buying. Also, despite the pandemic spread and gravity seems to be much lower than the beginning, a new wave is expected starting from autumn 2020. That’s why it is mandatory to limit PPEs waste and improve the information about their correct use, in order to increase their availability (15).

Safety procedures in otolaryngology during the covid-19 pandemic: clinical setting

The pandemic of COVID-19 is heavily interfering with ordinary medical practices and surgeries. Otolaryngology is one of the most affected specialities because routine examination and procedures place physicians close to patients’ upper respiratory tract. During the inspection of the oral cavity and the oropharynx, as well as in rhinoscopies, laryngoscopies and tracheostomy tube replacements, doctors and health workers are in direct contact with saliva and mucous suspensions. This is due to being only 20-30 cm far from the patient’s face, performing manoeuvres that potentially cause cough or sneeze as a physiological reflex (17-21). Besides, COVID-19 infections frequently present with respiratory symptoms involving the upper airway tract. Thus a swab test should be performed before ENT evaluation. In case of possible positive patients, the Italian Higher Institute of Health (ISS) recommends to the healthcare team to wear surgical masks, disposable gowns, gloves, and goggles; when performing aerosol-generating procedures. ISS recommends to use FFP2 (filtering facepiece) or FFP3, disposable and water-repellent gowns, gloves, and protective goggles (20). Moreover, in order to reduce patient exposure to contamination, all non-urgent examinations should be postponed by telephone contact. Delayable evaluations include benign and chronic diseases, oncologic controls, pediatric evaluations, and in every case, the presence of new-onset symptoms should be excluded. (20-23) Patients should be informed on the need to access sanitary facilities by wearing a surgical mask (18). As the ENT evaluation creates aerosols from the respiratory secretion, the outpatient room should be considered a potentially contaminated area (19). Therefore, the outpatient room must be structurally isolated by creating controlled access for the user through a filter area where the patient will enter wearing a mask (20, 21). The healthcare team should dispose of a clean area, dedicated to PPE wearing, and a separated dirty area for safe removal and elimination of contaminated PPE as described in the model in Fig. 2.
Figure 2.

Basic model of the structural organization of the patients’ and health workers’ pathways in order to contain as much as possible the potential spread of the virus in ENT daily clinical practice during epidemic.

Basic model of the structural organization of the patients’ and health workers’ pathways in order to contain as much as possible the potential spread of the virus in ENT daily clinical practice during epidemic.

Safety procedures in otolaryngology during the covid-19 pandemic: operating room setting

As for medical examination, surgery experienced substantial changes, with drastic cuts of operating room activity. As remarked and described by Pearlman AN et al., protocols created during COVID-19 pandemic reflected a “safety first” philosophy (38). This was due to avoiding patient’s contamination entering the hospital for non-urgent procedures, and because of the use of operating room ventilators to support COVID-19 intubated patients in many hospitals (4, 13, 34). In Wuhan, the most affected medical personnel were anesthesiologists, otolaryngologists, and ophthalmologists because of the close contact between nasal, oropharyngeal cavities and the eyes (32). For these professionals, during surgical procedures, the risk of intraoperative transmission of COVID-19 is very high. For these reasons, a growing number of Universities and surgical associations created guidelines, suggesting only performing emergency surgeries or, at least, those that cannot be delayed, such as oncological surgeries (18, 21, 34). In particular, endonasal endoscopic surgery and skull base surgery are considered to be high-risk procedures, since the use of debriders and drills within the nasal cavity produced aerosol droplets (30), as described in the Chinese experience (29). Many authors reported positive COVID-19 cases among surgeons and operating room team after an endoscopic nasal surgery (31). Also, pediatric surgery, except for emergent procedures, should be postponed, as the pediatric population can contract COVID-19 even if the great majority of children presents with mild or no symptoms (4). The Italian Society of Otolaryngology (SIO), following the British ENT Association instructions, recommends the use of PPEs during COVID-19 patients’ surgery, i.e. double disposable and water-repellent gowns, double gloves, FFP3 or N99 type masks, or, if not available, FFP2 or N95, eye protection, surgical cap, and proper shoes/boots. As far as eye protection is concerned, in order to protect from conjunctival penetration, the use of a disposable respirator and safety goggles, or a full-face respirator is suggested. Safety goggles with a rubber air seal provide a tighter air barrier (27, 28). Before the operation, it is recommended to test for COVID-19 through an oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swab twice (4 days before and 48 hours before surgery). If the test cannot be performed, the patient should be considered as positive. If the test is negative and the patient is asymptomatic, there is no particular instruction for the use of PPE, but the number of staff people and the length of surgery must be reduced. If the patient is positive, the surgery should be delayed, and the test should be repeated a few days later unless an emergent procedure is needed (33-35). Special isolating zones are fundamental, and so is an isolated operating room. A hostile pressure transfer vehicle, or at least a unique passageway, should be used to move patients. During intubation, an extra layer of gloves is necessary. When administering anaesthesia, it is preferable to do a rapid induction, moderate sedation and good muscle relaxant in order to avoid a choking cough. Strict monitoring should be performed throughout the entire operation (8). Tracheostomy is classified as a high-risk procedure in COVID-19 patients since it is an aerosol-generating procedure: the need for tracheostomy must consider both benefits and risks for the patient and staff (25, 26, 36, 37). Different medical societies have created their own recommended procedures to guide medical staff and to minimize risks for the patient. It is fundamental to create a dedicated team, well-informed about the recommended techniques and ability to apply them to the workplace. The presence of two head and neck surgeons and one anesthesiologist (a COVID team) is mandatory (15, 24). The following table (Table 2) sums up the instructions of two societies and offers a list of things to do during the days before surgery, during surgery, and after surgery.
Table 2.

How health care professionals need to plan and do before, during and after the tracheostomy in COVID-19 pandemic

Planning (Week of Surgery)

Team education: prepare the PPE and learn how to wear and use them

Choose the operating room, preferably one with negative-pressure or, if that’s not available, a well-ventilated room with closed doors during the procedure

Review the indication for tracheostomy, for the timing and for the prognosis

Choose cuffed and non-fenestrated tracheostomy tubes

Choose the COVID team and perform some simulation

Day of Surgery

Check the availability of PPEs for all staff, tracheostomy grab bag and tubes of various size with functioning cuff, closed in-line suction

Check the indication and the appropriateness of the tracheostomy, and whether the patient is relatively stable for tolerating lying flat with periods of apnea

A full paralysis of the patient reduces the risk of coughing

During Surgery

Stop ventilation and turn off flows after exposition of the trachea, allowing time for passive expiration

Advance the cuff beyond the proposed tracheal window, hyperinflate the cuff, and re-establish oxygenation with PEEP

Before opening the trachea, stop ventilation

Create a tracheal window, taking and inserting the cuffed non-fenestrated tracheal tube

Inflate the cuff immediately and confirm the position with end-tidal CO2

Take off PPE correctly, in the appropriate area

After Surgery

Pay attention during patient transfer and to holding the tracheostomy tube while in movement

Use only in-line closed suction circuits

Perform a periodic check of cuff pressure

Do not change dressing unless there’s clear sign of infection

The first tube change should be delayed by 7-10 days and staff must use all personal protections; perform a pause in ventilation, with flows off before deflating the cuff and inserting the new tube, after that follows immediate cuff re-inflation

Use the cuffed non-fenestrated tube until the patient is confirmed negative to infection

How health care professionals need to plan and do before, during and after the tracheostomy in COVID-19 pandemic Team education: prepare the PPE and learn how to wear and use them Choose the operating room, preferably one with negative-pressure or, if that’s not available, a well-ventilated room with closed doors during the procedure Review the indication for tracheostomy, for the timing and for the prognosis Choose cuffed and non-fenestrated tracheostomy tubes Choose the COVID team and perform some simulation Check the availability of PPEs for all staff, tracheostomy grab bag and tubes of various size with functioning cuff, closed in-line suction Check the indication and the appropriateness of the tracheostomy, and whether the patient is relatively stable for tolerating lying flat with periods of apnea A full paralysis of the patient reduces the risk of coughing Stop ventilation and turn off flows after exposition of the trachea, allowing time for passive expiration Advance the cuff beyond the proposed tracheal window, hyperinflate the cuff, and re-establish oxygenation with PEEP Before opening the trachea, stop ventilation Create a tracheal window, taking and inserting the cuffed non-fenestrated tracheal tube Inflate the cuff immediately and confirm the position with end-tidal CO2 Take off PPE correctly, in the appropriate area Pay attention during patient transfer and to holding the tracheostomy tube while in movement Use only in-line closed suction circuits Perform a periodic check of cuff pressure Do not change dressing unless there’s clear sign of infection The first tube change should be delayed by 7-10 days and staff must use all personal protections; perform a pause in ventilation, with flows off before deflating the cuff and inserting the new tube, after that follows immediate cuff re-inflation Use the cuffed non-fenestrated tube until the patient is confirmed negative to infection

Conclusions

In the current pandemic, as well as in any other medical emergency, the most crucial goal is to reduce the spread of the virus, especially within hospitals, where every contact represents a risk for patients and staff. It is necessary to prevent transmission of the disease from patients to medical staff and also from medical staff to patients. In case of a new wave, prompt behaviour with correct precautions are mandatory. For these reasons, in these circumstances, limiting nonessential activities and surgeries is needed. Hospitals must prevent the contamination of their medical staff and health care personnel in order to decrease connected clinical risks and the relative risk of contagion among the team of practitioners. If the contagion expands to the team and determines the reduction of their operation, sufficient health care for citizens is not guaranteed, also leading to high direct and indirect costs.
  14 in total

1.  [Suggestions for prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in otolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff].

Authors:  K Xu; X Q Lai; Z Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-02

Review 2.  Surgical Considerations for Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned From the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak.

Authors:  Joshua K Tay; Mark Li-Chung Khoo; Woei Shyang Loh
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 3.  Practical Aspects of Otolaryngologic Clinical Services During the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Epidemic: An Experience in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Jason Y K Chan; Eddy W Y Wong; Wayne Lam
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Alterations in Smell or Taste in Mildly Symptomatic Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinato; Cristoforo Fabbris; Jerry Polesel; Diego Cazzador; Daniele Borsetto; Claire Hopkins; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Evolution of Altered Sense of Smell or Taste in Patients With Mildly Symptomatic COVID-19.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Daniele Borsetto; Cristoforo Fabbris; Giacomo Spinato; Daniele Frezza; Anna Menegaldo; Francesca Mularoni; Piergiorgio Gaudioso; Diego Cazzador; Silvia Marciani; Samuele Frasconi; Maria Ferraro; Cecilia Berro; Chiara Varago; Piero Nicolai; Giancarlo Tirelli; Maria Cristina Da Mosto; Rupert Obholzer; Roberto Rigoli; Jerry Polesel; Claire Hopkins
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 6.  Establishing an Office-Based Framework for Resuming Otolaryngology Care in Academic Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Aaron N Pearlman; Abtin Tabaee; Anthony P Sclafani; Lucian Sulica; Samuel H Selesnick; David I Kutler; Joseph J Montano; Joshua I Levinger; Maria V Suurna; Vikash K Modi; Michael G Stewart
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 7.  Safety Recommendations for Evaluation and Surgery of the Head and Neck During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Babak Givi; Bradley A Schiff; Steven B Chinn; Daniel Clayburgh; N Gopalakrishna Iyer; Scharukh Jalisi; Michael G Moore; Cherie-Ann Nathan; Lisa A Orloff; James P O'Neill; Noah Parker; Chad Zender; Luc G T Morris; Louise Davies
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 8.  Review of Burden, Clinical Definitions, and Management of COVID-19 Cases.

Authors:  Laura McArthur; Dhanasekaran Sakthivel; Ricardo Ataide; Felicia Chan; Jack S Richards; Charles A Narh
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  CORONA-steps for tracheotomy in COVID-19 patients: A staff-safe method for airway management.

Authors:  Barbara Pichi; Francesco Mazzola; Anna Bonsembiante; Gerardo Petruzzi; Jacopo Zocchi; Silvia Moretto; Armando De Virgilio; Raul Pellini
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.337

10.  A Case of COVID-19 with Late-Onset Rash and Transient Loss of Taste and Smell in a 15-Year-Old Boy.

Authors:  Antonino Maniaci; Giannicola Iannella; Claudio Vicini; Piero Pavone; Giuseppe Nunnari; Raffaele Falsaperla; Paola Di Mauro; Salvatore Ferlito; Salvatore Cocuzza
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-20
View more
  14 in total

1.  A Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 detection method based on nasal and nasopharyngeal lavage fluid: A pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Daniele Frezza; Cristoforo Fabbris; Leonardo Franz; Elisa Vian; Roberto Rigoli; Rosalba De Siati; Enzo Emanuelli; Luigi Bertinato; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Giacomo Spinato
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-27

Review 2.  Challenges in Burn Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Michael Kohlhauser; Hanna Luze; Sebastian Philipp Nischwitz; Lars-Peter Kamolz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Hearing loss and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yukiko Wagatsuma; Kaori Daimaru; Shiqi Deng; Jou-Yin Chen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Psychosocial Factors Associated With Resilience Among Iranian Nurses During COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Maryam Nourollahi-Darabad; Davood Afshari; Niloofar Chinisaz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-08-04

5.  COVID-Q: Validation of the first COVID-19 questionnaire based on patient-rated symptom gravity.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinato; Cristoforo Fabbris; Federica Conte; Anna Menegaldo; Leonardo Franz; Piergiorgio Gaudioso; Francesco Cinetto; Carlo Agostini; Giulio Costantini; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.149

6.  The importance of early detection of ENT symptoms in mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinato; Giulio Costantini; Cristoforo Fabbris; Anna Menegaldo; Francesca Mularoni; Piergiorgio Gaudioso; Monica Mantovani; Daniele Borsetto; Ananth Vijendren; Maria Cristina Da Mosto; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Is 2020 the golden year of Otolaryngology research? The impact of COVID-19 on the Italian academic production.

Authors:  Eleonora Trecca; Pier Gerardo Marano; Matteo Gelardi; Lazzaro Cassano; Giannandrea Francesco Verzicco; Aurelio D'Ecclesia; Michele Cassano; Francesco Longo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 8.  Discrepancies of SARS-CoV-2 testing results among patients with total laryngectomy.

Authors:  C Fabbris; F Boaria; P Boscolo-Rizzo; E Emanuelli; G Spinato
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.236

9.  The Effect of Isotonic Saline Nasal Lavages in Improving Symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinato; Cristoforo Fabbris; Giulio Costantini; Federica Conte; Pier Giorgio Scotton; Francesco Cinetto; Rosalba De Siati; Alessandro Matarazzo; Marco Citterio; Giacomo Contro; Cosimo De Filippis; Carlo Agostini; Enzo Emanuelli; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Daniele Frezza
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Epidemiology Characteristics of COVID-19 Infection Amongst Primary Health Care Workers in Qatar: March-October 2020.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghaith Al-Kuwari; Mariam Ali AbdulMalik; Asma Ali Al-Nuaimi; Jazeel Abdulmajeed; Hamad Eid Al-Romaihi; Sandy Semaan; Mujeeb Kandy
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.