Literature DB >> 33681947

Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil associated with tacrolimus for liver transplantation immunosuppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Francisco Tustumi1, Antonio Afonso de Miranda Neto1, Sérgio Silveira Júnior1, Felipe Alexandre Fernandes1, Miller Barreto de Brito E Silva1, Lucas Ernani1, Lucas Souto Nacif1, Fabricio Ferreira Coelho1, Wellington Andraus1, Wanderley Marques Bernardo1, Paulo Herman1, Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque1.   

Abstract

A combination of immunosuppressants may improve outcomes due to the synergistic effect of their different action mechanisms. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best immunosuppressive protocol after liver transplantation. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients undergoing liver transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eight randomized trials were included. The proportion of patients with at least one adverse event related to the immunosuppression scheme with tacrolimus associated with MMF was 39.9%. The tacrolimus with MMF immunosuppression regimen was superior in preventing acute cellular rejection compared with that of tacrolimus alone (risk difference [RD]=-0.11; p =0.001). The tacrolimus plus MMF regimen showed no difference in the risk of adverse events compared to that of tacrolimus alone (RD=0.7; p=0.66) and cyclosporine plus MMF (RD=-0.7; p=0.37). Patients undergoing liver transplantation who received tacrolimus plus MMF had similar adverse events when compared to patients receiving other evaluated immunosuppressive regimens and had a lower risk of acute rejection than those receiving in the monodrug tacrolimus regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33681947      PMCID: PMC7920399          DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1807-5932            Impact factor:   2.365


  20 in total

Review 1.  Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  M L Ritter; L Pirofski
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Discovery of FK-506, a novel immunosuppressant isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis.

Authors:  T Goto; T Kino; H Hatanaka; M Nishiyama; M Okuhara; M Kohsaka; H Aoki; H Imanaka
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Indications of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jochen Klupp; Robert Pfitzmann; Jan M Langrehr; Peter Neuhaus
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Reduced-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil vs. standard-dose tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a randomized study.

Authors:  K Boudjema; C Camus; F Saliba; Y Calmus; E Salamé; G Pageaux; C Ducerf; C Duvoux; C Mouchel; A Renault; P Compagnon; R Lorho; E Bellissant
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Withdrawal of steroids: a randomized prospective study of prednisone and tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with autoimmune hepatitis.

Authors:  G Junge; R Neuhaus; L Schewior; J Klupp; O Guckelberger; J M Langrehr; S Tullius; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  First results from a prospective randomized trial comparing steroid-free induction therapy with tacrolimus and MMF versus tacrolimus and steroids in patients after liver transplantation for HCV.

Authors:  J M Langrehr; U P Neumann; M Lang; A R Müller; S Jonas; U Settmacher; T Steinmüller; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  A prospective randomized open study in liver transplant recipients: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus versus tacrolimus and steroids.

Authors:  Alejandra Otero; Evaristo Varo; Jorge Ortiz de Urbina; Rafael Martín-Vivaldi; Valentin Cuervas-Mons; Ignacio González-Pinto; Antoni Rimola; Angel Bernardos; Santiago Otero; Jorge Maldonado; Jose I Herrero; Elena Barrao; Rosa Domínguez-Granados
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Four-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine microemulsion or tacrolimus following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert A Fisher; James J Stone; Luke G Wolfe; Cheryl M Rodgers; Melodie L Anderson; Richard K Sterling; Mitchell L Shiffman; Velimer A Luketic; Melissa J Contos; A Scott Mills; Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez; Marc P Posner
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  Randomized, multicenter trial comparing tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus plus steroids in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Takada; Toshimi Kaido; Katsuhiro Asonuma; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Shoji Kubo; Tetsuya Kiuchi; Yukihiro Inomata; Shuji Isaji; Hayami Tsumura; Satoshi Teramukai; Yoshihiro Matsubara; Satomi Sakabayashi; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Mycophenolate mofetil severely depresses antibody response to CMV infection in early posttransplant period.

Authors:  S C Zmonarski; M Boratynska; K Madziarska; M Klinger; M Kusztel; D Patrzalek; P Szyber
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Liver Transplant Recipients: Does It Make Any Difference?

Authors:  Daniela Punga; Sebastian Isac; Cristian Paraipan; Mihail Cotorogea; Andreea Stefan; Cristian Cobilinschi; Ileana Adela Vacaroiu; Raluca Tulin; Dorin Ionescu; Gabriela Droc
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.