Literature DB >> 14529889

Mycophenolate mofetil severely depresses antibody response to CMV infection in early posttransplant period.

S C Zmonarski1, M Boratynska, K Madziarska, M Klinger, M Kusztel, D Patrzalek, P Szyber.   

Abstract

Estimation of anti-CMV-IgG and anti-CMV-IgM is considered a relatively inexpensive screening tool of CMV status. The aim of study was to estimate how the immunosuppressive protocol influence serum anti-CMV IgG and IgM concentration in renal graft recipients and to estimate the adequacy of anti-CMV-IgG concentration and anti-CMV-IgM index as screening parameters of active CMV disease in patients receiving different immunosuppression. The study group consisted of 33 patients with clinical signs of CMV disease who received one of three types of immunosuppression: (1) azathioprine (Aza) + cyclosporine (CyA) + prednisone (Pr), 20 patients; (2) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + CyA + Pr, eight patients; tacrolimus (Tac) + MMF, five patients. Patients were enrolled when the pp65-antigen (pp65) of PBL was positive within 1 to 5 months after transplant (75 patients tested). The IgM-i in the Aza + CyA + Pr group was higher than in MMF + CyA + Pr group (2.73 + 1.8 vs 1.08 +/- 1.07, P =.021). The IgM-i in the Aza + CyA + Pr group was higher than in Tac + MMF (2.73 +/- 1.8 vs 0.78 +/- 0.69; P =.014). There was no difference in IgM-i between MMF + CyA + Pr and Tac + MMF. There was no difference in relative increase of IgG-c among all groups but there was a difference in relative increase of IgM-i between Aza + CyA + Pr and MMF + CyA + Pr groups (6.7 +/- 9.4 vs 2.3 +/- 5.9; P =.007) and between Aza + CyA + Pr and MMF + Tac groups (6.7 +/- 9.4 vs 0.6 +/- 0.54; P =.003). Immunosuppressive protocols including MMF exert an inhibitory influence on B-cell response and synthesis of anti-CMV-IgM. It makes the anti-CMV-IgM index an inadequate rough screening diagnostic parameter of active CMV disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529889     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00764-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  M L Ritter; L Pirofski
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Successful attenuation of humoral immunity to viral capsid and transgenic protein following AAV-mediated gene transfer with a non-depleting CD4 antibody and cyclosporine.

Authors:  J H McIntosh; M Cochrane; S Cobbold; H Waldmann; S A Nathwani; A M Davidoff; A C Nathwani
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil associated with tacrolimus for liver transplantation immunosuppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Francisco Tustumi; Antonio Afonso de Miranda Neto; Sérgio Silveira Júnior; Felipe Alexandre Fernandes; Miller Barreto de Brito E Silva; Lucas Ernani; Lucas Souto Nacif; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Wellington Andraus; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Paulo Herman; Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  MMF/MPA Is the Main Mediator of a Delayed Humoral Response With Reduced Antibody Decline in Kidney Transplant Recipients After SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination.

Authors:  Julian Stumpf; Torsten Siepmann; Jörg Schwöbel; Grit Glombig; Alexander Paliege; Anne Steglich; Florian Gembardt; Friederike Kessel; Hannah Kröger; Patrick Arndt; Jan Sradnick; Kerstin Frank; Anna Klimova; René Mauer; Torsten Tonn; Christian Hugo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.