Literature DB >> 33681817

Examining the Effect of Haptic Factors for Vascular Palpation Skill Assessment Using an Affordable Simulator.

Zhanhe Liu1, Joseph Bible2, Jared Wells1, Deepak Vadivalagan3, Ravikiran Singapogu1.   

Abstract

GOAL: Simulators that incorporate haptic feedback for clinical skills training are increasingly used in medical education. This study addresses the neglected aspect of rendering simulated feedback for vascular palpation skills training by systematically examining the effect of haptic factors on performance.
METHODS: A simulator-based approach to examine palpation skill is presented. Novice participants with and without minimal previous palpation training performed a palpation task on a simulator that rendered controlled vibratory feedback under various conditions.
RESULTS: Five objective metrics were employed to analyze participants' performance that yielded key findings in quantifying palpation performance. Participants' palpation accuracy was influenced by all three haptic factors, ranging from moderate to statistically significant. Duration, Total Path Length and Ration of Correct Movement also demonstrated utility for quantifying performance.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that our affordable simulator is capable of rendering controlled haptic feedback suitable for skills training. Further, metrics presented in this study can be used for structured palpation skills assessment and training, potentially improving healthcare delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haptic rendering; Medical simulator; Performance assessment; Skill training

Year:  2020        PMID: 33681817      PMCID: PMC7932134          DOI: 10.1109/ojemb.2020.3017156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol        ISSN: 2644-1276


  19 in total

1.  Haptic palpation for medical simulation in virtual environments.

Authors:  Sebastian Ullrich; Torsten Kuhlen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  Task versus subtask surgical skill evaluation of robotic minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2009

3.  A simulation-based assessment of clinical breast examination technique: do patient and clinician factors affect clinician approach?

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Zachary B Domont; Lawrence H Salud; Katherine M Blossfield
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Haptic perception: a tutorial.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Integrating Haptics with Augmented Reality in a Femoral Palpation and Needle Insertion Training Simulation.

Authors:  T R Coles; N W John; Derek A Gould; D G Caldwell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  A stiffness discrimination experiment including analysis of palpation forces and velocities.

Authors:  Ernur Karadogan; Robert L Williams; John N Howell; Robert R Conatser
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.929

7.  An algorithm for the physical examination of early fistula failure.

Authors:  Gerald A Beathard
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts.

Authors:  Mark Wilson; John McGrath; Samuel Vine; James Brewer; David Defriend; Richard Masters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Behavioral characteristics of manual palpation to localize hard nodules in soft tissues.

Authors:  Jelizaveta Konstantinova; Min Li; Gautam Mehra; Prokar Dasgupta; Kaspar Althoefer; Thrishantha Nanayakkara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Artificial palpation in robotic surgery using haptic feedback.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Yen-Yi Juo; Anna Tao; Syed J Askari; Jake Pensa; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Motion Smoothness Metrics for Cannulation Skill Assessment: What Factors Matter?

Authors:  Simar Singh; Joe Bible; Zhanhe Liu; Ziyang Zhang; Ravikiran Singapogu
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-04-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.