Literature DB >> 33681546

Micro-Networks for Robust MR-Guided Low Count PET Imaging.

Casper O da Costa-Luis1, Andrew J Reader1.   

Abstract

Noise suppression is particularly important in low count positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Post-smoothing (PS) and regularization methods which aim to reduce noise also tend to reduce resolution and introduce bias. Alternatively, anatomical information from another modality such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to improve image quality. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are particularly well suited to such joint image processing, but usually require large amounts of training data and have mostly been applied outside the field of medical imaging or focus on classification and segmentation, leaving PET image quality improvement relatively understudied. This article proposes the use of a relatively low-complexity CNN (micro-net) as a post-reconstruction MR-guided image processing step to reduce noise and reconstruction artefacts while also improving resolution in low count PET scans. The CNN is designed to be fully 3-D, robust to very limited amounts of training data, and to accept multiple inputs (including competitive denoising methods). Application of the proposed CNN on simulated low (30 M) count data (trained to produce standard (300 M) count reconstructions) results in a 36% lower normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE, calculated over ten realizations against the ground truth) compared to maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) used in clinical practice. In contrast, a decrease of only 25% in NRMSE is obtained when an optimized (using knowledge of the ground truth) PS is performed. A 26% NRMSE decrease is obtained with both RM and optimized PS. Similar improvement is also observed for low count real patient datasets. Overfitting to training data is demonstrated to occur as the network size is increased. In an extreme case, a U-net (which produces better predictions for training data) is shown to completely fail on test data due to overfitting to this case of very limited training data. Meanwhile, the resultant images from the proposed CNN (which has low training data requirements) have lower noise, reduced ringing, and partial volume effects, as well as sharper edges and improved resolution compared to conventional MLEM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural network (CNN); deep learning (DL); guided reconstruction; image processing; image reconstruction; machine learning; magnetic resonance (MR); maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM); positron emission tomography (PET); resolution modeling (RM); resolution recovery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33681546      PMCID: PMC7931458          DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.2986414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci        ISSN: 2469-7303


  28 in total

1.  Predicting standard-dose PET image from low-dose PET and multimodal MR images using mapping-based sparse representation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Pei Zhang; Le An; Guangkai Ma; Jiayin Kang; Feng Shi; Xi Wu; Jiliu Zhou; David S Lalush; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  3D Auto-Context-Based Locality Adaptive Multi-Modality GANs for PET Synthesis.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Luping Zhou; Biting Yu; Lei Wang; Chen Zu; David S Lalush; Weili Lin; Xi Wu; Jiliu Zhou; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Point/counterpoint. Resolution modeling enhances PET imaging.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Arman Rahmim; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET.

Authors:  Simon Stute; Claude Comtat
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Rapid processing of PET list-mode data for efficient uncertainty estimation and data analysis.

Authors:  P J Markiewicz; K Thielemans; J M Schott; D Atkinson; S R Arridge; B F Hutton; S Ourselin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  3D conditional generative adversarial networks for high-quality PET image estimation at low dose.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Biting Yu; Lei Wang; Chen Zu; David S Lalush; Weili Lin; Xi Wu; Jiliu Zhou; Dinggang Shen; Luping Zhou
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  S Tong; A M Alessio; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  MR-Guided Kernel EM Reconstruction for Reduced Dose PET Imaging.

Authors:  James Bland; Abolfazl Mehranian; Martin A Belzunce; Sam Ellis; Colm J McGinnity; Alexander Hammers; Andrew J Reader
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-09

10.  NiftyPET: a High-throughput Software Platform for High Quantitative Accuracy and Precision PET Imaging and Analysis.

Authors:  Pawel J Markiewicz; Matthias J Ehrhardt; Kjell Erlandsson; Philip J Noonan; Anna Barnes; Jonathan M Schott; David Atkinson; Simon R Arridge; Brian F Hutton; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-01
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Noise2Void: unsupervised denoising of PET images.

Authors:  Tzu-An Song; Fan Yang; Joyita Dutta
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Enhancement in PET Imaging: Noise Reduction and Resolution Enhancement.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Masoud Malekzadeh; Niloufar Mirian; Tzu-An Song; Chi Liu; Joyita Dutta
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-10

4.  Anatomically aided PET image reconstruction using deep neural networks.

Authors:  Zhaoheng Xie; Tiantian Li; Xuezhu Zhang; Wenyuan Qi; Evren Asma; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 5.  Deep learning-based image reconstruction and post-processing methods in positron emission tomography for low-dose imaging and resolution enhancement.

Authors:  Cameron Dennis Pain; Gary F Egan; Zhaolin Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.