Literature DB >> 33681459

Design and Implementation of the Pre-Clinical DICOM Standard in Multi-Cohort Murine Studies.

Joseph D Kalen1, David A Clunie2, Yanling Liu3, James L Tatum4, Paula M Jacobs4, Justin Kirby5, John B Freymann5, Ulrike Wagner6, Kirk E Smith7, Christian Suloway3, James H Doroshow8.   

Abstract

The small animal imaging Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) acquisition context structured report (SR) was developed to incorporate pre-clinical data in an established DICOM format for rapid queries and comparison of clinical and non-clinical datasets. Established terminologies (i.e., anesthesia, mouse model nomenclature, veterinary definitions, NCI Metathesaurus) were utilized to assist in defining terms implemented in pre-clinical imaging and new codes were added to integrate the specific small animal procedures and handling processes, such as housing, biosafety level, and pre-imaging rodent preparation. In addition to the standard DICOM fields, the small animal SR includes fields specific to small animal imaging such as tumor graft (i.e., melanoma), tissue of origin, mouse strain, and exogenous material, including the date and site of injection. Additionally, the mapping and harmonization developed by the Mouse-Human Anatomy Project were implemented to assist co-clinical research by providing cross-reference human-to-mouse anatomies. Furthermore, since small animal imaging performs multi-mouse imaging for high throughput, and queries for co-clinical research requires a one-to-one relation, an imaging splitting routine was developed, new Unique Identifiers (UID's) were created, and the original patient name and ID were saved for reference to the original dataset. We report the implementation of the small animal SR using MRI datasets (as an example) of patient-derived xenograft mouse models and uploaded to The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) for public dissemination, and also implemented this on PET/CT datasets. The small animal SR enhancement provides researchers the ability to query any DICOM modality pre-clinical and clinical datasets using standard vocabularies and enhances co-clinical studies.
© 2021 by the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DICOM; animal model; co-clinical; in vivo imaging; patient-derived xenograft (PDX); pre-clinical

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33681459      PMCID: PMC7934703          DOI: 10.3390/tomography7010001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tomography        ISSN: 2379-1381


  8 in total

1.  Guidance for methods descriptions used in preclinical imaging papers.

Authors:  David Stout; Stuart S Berr; Amy LeBlanc; Joseph D Kalen; Dustin Osborne; Julie Price; Wynne Schiffer; Claudia Kuntner; Jonathan Wall
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  Image acquisition context: procedure description attributes for clinically relevant indexing and selective retrieval of biomedical images.

Authors:  W D Bidgood; B Bray; N Brown; A R Mori; K A Spackman; A Golichowski; R H Jones; L Korman; B Dove; L Hildebrand; M Berg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development.

Authors:  John J Tentler; Aik Choon Tan; Colin D Weekes; Antonio Jimeno; Stephen Leong; Todd M Pitts; John J Arcaroli; Wells A Messersmith; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Patient-derived orthotopic xenografts: better mimic of metastasis than subcutaneous xenografts.

Authors:  Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  PDX-MI: Minimal Information for Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft Models.

Authors:  Terrence F Meehan; Nathalie Conte; Theodore Goldstein; Giorgio Inghirami; Mark A Murakami; Sebastian Brabetz; Zhiping Gu; Jeffrey A Wiser; Patrick Dunn; Dale A Begley; Debra M Krupke; Andrea Bertotti; Alejandra Bruna; Matthew H Brush; Annette T Byrne; Carlos Caldas; Amanda L Christie; Dominic A Clark; Heidi Dowst; Jonathan R Dry; James H Doroshow; Olivier Duchamp; Yvonne A Evrard; Stephane Ferretti; Kristopher K Frese; Neal C Goodwin; Danielle Greenawalt; Melissa A Haendel; Els Hermans; Peter J Houghton; Jos Jonkers; Kristel Kemper; Tin O Khor; Michael T Lewis; K C Kent Lloyd; Jeremy Mason; Enzo Medico; Steven B Neuhauser; James M Olson; Daniel S Peeper; Oscar M Rueda; Je Kyung Seong; Livio Trusolino; Emilie Vinolo; Robert J Wechsler-Reya; David M Weinstock; Alana Welm; S John Weroha; Frédéric Amant; Stefan M Pfister; Marcel Kool; Helen Parkinson; Atul J Butte; Carol J Bult
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice.

Authors:  Barbara J Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Isabel Hildebrandt; Chris Tran; Benjamin S Halpern; David Stout; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  A spontaneously metastatic model of bladder cancer: imaging characterization.

Authors:  James L Tatum; Joseph D Kalen; Paula M Jacobs; Lilia V Ileva; Lisa A Riffle; Melinda G Hollingshead; James H Doroshow
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.