Literature DB >> 33680840

Surgical treatment of midfoot charcot neuroarthropathy review of literature and our results after superconstruct reconstruction of midfoot charcot neuroarthropathy.

Johnny Frøkjær1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) of the midfoot was traditionally treated non-operatively with off-loading in a total contact cast (TCC). After introduction of the super construct concept, promising results were reported, however there is a need for further studies on this concept. Analysis of non-operative versus operative treatment is presented as well as our results from a consecutive series of 20 patients operated with the superconstruct concept.
METHODS: Twenty patients were operated from July 2017 until June 2020. Mean age was 58 years (50-80), mean weight was 116 kg (68-156), giving a BMI of 31 (26-45). Preoperative patients off-loaded in a TCC until decreased swelling and skin temperature measurement or ulcer had healed, mean 16 weeks immobilization. Surgery was without tourniquet, using a standard medial and lateral incision. Mean follow up is 24 (5-40) months.
RESULTS: Mean operation time was 227 (150-315) minutes. Medial column fusion was mandatory, in five cases as an isolated procedure, in 12 cases in combination with lateral column fusion and in three cases with a talocalcaneal fusion. Preoperative lateral Meary angle decreased from 23.5 to 9.6°, antero-posterior Meary angle decreased from 16.0 to 4.7°. Eight patients had postoperative incisional wound problems. Four patients had partial implant removal. All healed with a good clinical result. Two patients had an acute Charcot attack in the ankle joint during postoperative mobilization. One had a severe collapse of the talus resulting in a below knee amputation, giving an amputation rate of 5%. Radiographic examination at follow up, showed bone union of all patients. Nineteen patients are ambulated in orthopedic shoes at latest follow up, giving a 95% satisfactory result.
CONCLUSION: Superconstruct reconstruction of CN midfoot collapse is a safe procedure. There are incisional wound problems, recognition and fast treatment of these complications is important to achieve good results. There is a risk for overloading the ankle, initiating a new acute Charcot attack. Attention must be on this problem. The surgical technique is demanding and should be performed by experienced foot and ankle surgeons in a multidisciplinary team set up.
© 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charcot; Charcot reconstruction; Medullary beaming; Midfoot; Neuroarthropathy; Superconstruct

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680840      PMCID: PMC7919936          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  13 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Complications for Internal and External Fixation for Charcot Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paul Dayton; Mindi Feilmeier; Mitchell Thompson; Paul Whitehouse; Rachel A Reimer
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  Treatment of Eichenholtz stage I Charcot foot arthropathy with a weightbearing total contact cast.

Authors:  Michael S Pinzur; Tammy Lio; Matthew Posner
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 3.  An Approach to Managing Midfoot Charcot Deformities.

Authors:  Ashtin Doorgakant; Mark B Davies
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.653

4.  Duration of off-loading and recurrence rate in Charcot osteo-arthropathy treated with less restrictive regimen with removable walker.

Authors:  Tomas M Christensen; Birthe Gade-Rasmussen; Lis W Pedersen; Eva Hommel; Per E Holstein; Ole L Svendsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.852

5.  Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Midfoot Charcot Reconstruction With Intramedullary Beaming.

Authors:  Samuel E Ford; Bruce E Cohen; W Hodges Davis; Carroll P Jones
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Intramedullary medial column support with the Midfoot Fusion Bolt (MFB) is not sufficient for osseous healing of arthrodesis in neuroosteoarthropathic feet.

Authors:  Anica Eschler; Annekatrin Wussow; Benjamin Ulmar; Thomas Mittlmeier; Georg Gradl
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Surgical versus accommodative treatment for Charcot arthropathy of the midfoot.

Authors:  Michael Pinzur
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Intramedullary fixation in severe Charcot osteo-neuroarthropathy with foot deformity results in adequate correction without loss of correction - Results from a multi-centre study.

Authors:  Martinus Richter; Thomas Mittlmeier; Stefan Rammelt; Per-Henrik Agren; Sarah Hahn; Anica Eschler
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.705

9.  Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joon Ha; Thomas Hester; Robert Foley; Ines L H Reichert; Prashanth R J Vas; Raju Ahluwalia; Venu Kavarthapu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-20

10.  Results of Simple Conservative Treatment of Midfoot Charcot Arthropathy.

Authors:  You Keun Kim; Ho Seong Lee; Sang Gyo Seo; Seung-Hwan Park; Dimas Boedijono
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.