Literature DB >> 30284492

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Midfoot Charcot Reconstruction With Intramedullary Beaming.

Samuel E Ford1, Bruce E Cohen2, W Hodges Davis2, Carroll P Jones2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: : The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes and complications of patients with midfoot Charcot managed with midfoot osteotomy, realignment arthrodesis, and stabilization using intramedullary beams.
METHODS: : Consecutive patients with midfoot Charcot treated at a tertiary-care foot and ankle center from January 2013 to July 2016 who underwent corrective osteotomy with internal beam fixation were identified; 25 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up were evaluated with physical examination, weightbearing radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures. The primary outcome measure was defined as restoration of a stable, plantigrade, ulcer-free foot. Median age was 58 years, median BMI was 32, and 80% were diabetic (75% insulin-dependent).
RESULTS: : An ulcer-free, stable, plantigrade foot was obtained in 84% of patients. The radiographic lateral and anteroposterior Meary angle medians improved 9° and 15°, respectively, from preoperative to final postoperative weightbearing measurements ( P < .001 and P = .02). Overall, 46% of midfoot osteotomies were united on final radiographs at a median 18-month radiographic follow-up. Deep infection developed in 6 (24%) patients. The presence of a preoperative ulcer was found to be predictive of postoperative infection (P = .04); all 6 deep infections occurred in patients with preoperative ulceration. Four (16%) patients progressed to amputation at a mean 15 postoperative months, all for deep infection.
CONCLUSION: : Midfoot Charcot reconstruction with intramedullary beaming allowed for restoration of an ulcer-free, plantigrade foot in most patients, but the complication rates were high, especially in patients with preoperative ulceration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charcot; deformity; diabetes; infection; internal fixation; intramedullary beam; intramedullary bolt; midfoot; osteoarthropathy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30284492     DOI: 10.1177/1071100718799966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Quality of Life Improvement Following Reconstruction of Midtarsal Charcot Foot Deformity: A Five Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Patrick Cole McGregor; Madeline M Lyons; Michael S Pinzur
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

2.  Outcomes of Tendo-Achilles lengthening and weight-bearing total contact cast for management of early midfoot charcot neuroarthropathy.

Authors:  Madhu Tiruveedhula; Anna Graham; Ankur Thapar; Shiva Dindyal; Michael Mulcahy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-10

3.  Surgical treatment of midfoot charcot neuroarthropathy review of literature and our results after superconstruct reconstruction of midfoot charcot neuroarthropathy.

Authors:  Johnny Frøkjær
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-02-11

4.  Is Reconstruction of Unstable Midfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy Cost Effective from a US Payer's Perspective?

Authors:  Rachel H Albright; Robert M Joseph; Dane K Wukich; David G Armstrong; Adam E Fleischer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Long-term follow-up of conservative treatment of Charcot feet.

Authors:  Viviane Gratwohl; Thorsten Jentzsch; Madlaina Schöni; Dominik Kaiser; Martin C Berli; Thomas Böni; Felix W A Waibel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.928

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.