Literature DB >> 33680516

Anterolateral Bone Window for Revision Broken Cemented Stem of Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.

Mohamed Mosa Mohamed Mahmoud1, Bahaaeldin Ibrahim1, Amr Abdelhalem Amr1, Maysara Abdelhalem Bayoumy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractured stem of the hip prosthesis is well documented in the literature. Although it is rare, it is considered as a challenging problem. Many techniques have been described to solve this problem. Purpose of the Study. Evaluation of the effect of anterolateral bone window for extraction of the cemented femoral stem of hemiarthroplasty in revision total hip replacement.
METHODS: The study included eight revision hip arthroplasties in eight patients, with a broken stem of cemented (Thompson) hemiarthroplasty, which has been revised by the anterolateral proximal femoral window. All cases received cemented cups and cement-in-cement stems, except one case who received cementless long stem. Clinical follow-up of cases by Harries hip score (HHS) and X-ray.
RESULTS: Functional improvement of HHS of all cases, with no signs of loosening, after a mean follow-up period of 1.5 years.
CONCLUSION: Extraction of broken stem is a challenging procedure. Many techniques have been described for revision of cases with a fractured stem of hip prosthesis, but we think that the anterolateral femoral bone window is a reproducible technique due to the characteristics of simplicity, short-time procedure, less invasive, not requiring extra instruments, and can be successful for most patients.
Copyright © 2021 Mohamed Mosa Mohamed Mahmoud et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680516      PMCID: PMC7925039          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6620395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Orthop        ISSN: 2090-3464


  19 in total

1.  Prosthetic component failures in hip arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  D A Heck; C M Partridge; J D Reuben; W L Lanzer; C G Lewis; E M Keating
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Fatigue fracture of a short stem hip replacement: a failure analysis with electron microscopy and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bernd A Ishaque; Henning Stürz; Erhan Basad
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Busch; M N Charles; C M Haydon; R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck; S J Macdonald; R W McCalden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-10

4.  The window technique for the removal of broken femoral stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J R Moreland; R Marder; W E Anspach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Three dimensional stress analysis of the femoral stem of a total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  S J Hampton; T P Andriacchi; J O Galante
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Fracture failure of a forged vitallium prosthesis. A case report.

Authors:  E H Miller; R Shastri; C I Shih
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Fracture of femoral prostheses in total hip replacement. A clinical study.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cementless femoral components should be made from cobalt chrome.

Authors:  N G Sotereanos; C A Engh; A H Glassman; G E Macalino; C A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Femoral stem failure in total hip replacement.

Authors:  D K Collis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Mechanical failures in total hip replacement requiring reoperation.

Authors:  P M Pellicci; E A Salvati; H J Robinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.