Literature DB >> 24836419

Effect of quality of life measures on the decision to remove third molars in subjects with mild pericoronitis symptoms.

Dana T Tang1, Ceib Phillips2, William R Proffit3, Lorne D Koroluk4, Raymond P White5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess how quality of life (QoL) measures affect the decision for third molar (3M) removal in patients with mild symptoms of pericoronitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects, aged 18 to 35 years, with mild symptoms of pericoronitis were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study. The demographic, clinical, and QoL data were collected at enrollment. The subjects voluntarily scheduled surgery for 3M removal. The principal outcome variable was their decision to undergo or not undergo surgery within 6 months of enrollment. The possible predictor variables in a multivariate logistic regression analysis were the demographic characteristics, dental insurance, and QoL measures.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 113 subjects was 23.2 ± 3.8 years. Of the 113 subjects, 79 elected to undergo 3M removal within 6 months of enrollment (removed group) and 34 elected to retain their 3M at 6 months after enrollment (retained group). A significantly greater proportion of the removed group were white (58% vs 35%; P = .03) and reported having at least "a little trouble" with opening their mouths (38% vs 18%; P = .04) and taking part in social life (27% vs 6%; P = .01). The multivariate logistic regression model suggested the odds of electing 3M removal within 6 months of enrollment were greater for those who were white (odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 6.32) and those who had at least "a little trouble" with interactions in their social life (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 9.58).
CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with mild pericoronitis symptoms, experiencing problems with oral function and lifestyle, factors not often considered by clinicians, were significantly associated with subjects' decision for early 3M removal.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24836419     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  Indications of the extraction of symptomatic impacted third molars. A systematic review.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha-Diago; Octavi Camps-Font; Alba Sánchez-Torres; Rui Figueiredo; María-Angeles Sánchez-Garcés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  Exploring and modelling impacts of third molar experience on quality of life: a real-time qualitative study using Twitter.

Authors:  Kamal Hanna; Paul Sambrook; Jason M Armfield; David S Brennan
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Quality of Life of Patients with Mandibular Third Molars and Mild Pericoronitis. A Comparison between Two Different Treatments: Extraction or Periodontal Approach.

Authors:  P C Passarelli; M A Lopez; V Desantis; G B Piccirillo; E Rella; V Giovannini; A Speranza; M De Leonardis; P F Manicone; M Casale; A D'Addona
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29

4.  Impact of mandibular third molar extraction in the second molar periodontal status: A prospective study.

Authors:  Paulo Eduardo Melo Stella; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci; Lorrayne Estéfane Oliveira de Medeiros; Dhelfeson Willya Douglas-de-Oliveira; Patricia Furtado Gonçalves; Olga Dumont Flecha; Cássio Roberto Rocha Dos Santos
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

5.  Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and the Use of Oral and Topical Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Pericoronitis.

Authors:  Abdullah Alalwani; Oğuz Buhara; Mustafa Şenol Tüzüm
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.