Literature DB >> 33680306

The Carbon Footprint of Residency Interview Travel.

Laura M Donahue, Helen K Morgan, William J Peterson, John A Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, medical student residency applicants have shown a substantial increase in the number of interviews attended, which is associated with a significant increase in travel. The carbon footprint associated with residency interviews has not been well documented prior to this investigation, and is a critical issue related to climate health.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to document the carbon footprint associated with travel to residency interviews of the applicants from a single institution.
METHODS: Graduating medical students from the University of Michigan Medical School were surveyed in 2020 to gather information regarding travel related to residency interviews. A validated carbon emissions calculator was used to determine the associated carbon footprint.
RESULTS: Response rate was 103 of 174 (59%). Average interviews per student across all specialties was 14.39 interviews per student. The overall class average for total carbon footprint per student was calculated as 3.07 metric tons CO2, making the class average carbon footprint per interview 0.21 metric tons CO2. If we extrapolate the results of our study to all residents, the resulting CO2 emissions approach 51 665 metric tons CO2 per year, which is equivalent to the amount of CO2 produced by 11 162 passenger cars in 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical education leaders could help reduce the carbon footprint by encouraging a reduction in number of in-person interviews attended by applicants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680306      PMCID: PMC7901631          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00418.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  8 in total

1.  Reducing the carbon footprint of medical conferences.

Authors:  Ian Roberts; Fiona Godlee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-17

2.  Mode, load, and specific climate impact from passenger trips.

Authors:  Jens Borken-Kleefeld; Jan Fuglestvedt; Terje Berntsen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  The Economic Burden of Residency Interviews on Applicants.

Authors:  Harold A Fogel; Tomas E Liskutin; Karen Wu; Lukas Nystrom; Brendan Martin; Adam Schiff
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2018

4.  How Can Individuals and the GI Community Reduce Climate Change?

Authors:  John A Williams; John Y Kao; M Bishr Omary
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Improving the Residency Application and Selection Process: An Optional Early Result Acceptance Program.

Authors:  Maya M Hammoud; John Andrews; Susan E Skochelak
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Air travel for global health: flying in the face of sustainable development?

Authors:  Ishtar Govia; Cornelia Guell; Nigel Unwin; Pamela Wadende
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The prevalence and cost of medical student visiting rotations.

Authors:  Matthew Winterton; Jaimo Ahn; Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  How scientists can reduce their carbon footprint.

Authors:  Jeremy Nathans; Peter Sterling
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Quantifying the climate benefits of a virtual versus an in-person format for an international conference.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Lewy; Casey D Patnode; Philip J Landrigan; Joseph C Kolars; Brent C Williams
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 7.123

2.  The Virtual Interview Experience: Perspectives of Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship Applicants.

Authors:  J Shirine Allam; Kristin M Burkart; Başak Çoruh; May Lee; Laura Hinkle; Maryl Kreider; Geneva Tatem; Chad Witt; Rendell W Ashton; Tristan Huie; Bart Moulton; Elizabeth Awerbuch; Gabriel T Bosslet
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2022-01-06

3.  COUNTERPOINT: Should Fellowship Interviews Remain Exclusively Virtual? No.

Authors:  J Shirine Allam
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  POINT: Should Fellowship Interviews Remain Exclusively Virtual? Yes.

Authors:  Başak Çoruh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Virtual Recruitment: Experiences and Perspectives of Internal Medicine Program Directors.

Authors:  Rachel P Simmons; Jordan Ortiz; Michael Kisielewski; Aimee Zaas; Kathleen M Finn
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Adapting to the Era of Virtual Recruitment: Radiology Departmental Website Response to COVID-19 and Portrayal of the Resident Experience.

Authors:  Thomas Y Wong; Jennifer J Huang; Erin A Cooke; Jason C Hoffmann; Edwin F Donnelly
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Re: A chance for reform: the environmental impact of travel for general surgery residency interviews.

Authors:  Zuhal Mohmand; Karina Prucnal
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2022-07-06

8.  Emerging from the Pandemic: AAIM Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency and Fellowship Interview Standards.

Authors:  Vera P Luther; David A Wininger; Cindy J Lai; Anthony Dao; Maria M Garcia; Whitney Harper; Timothy M Chow; Ricardo Correa; Lindsey J Gay; Lyle Fettig; Bhavin Dalal; Patricia Vassallo; Steven Barczi; Michelle Sweet
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 5.928

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.