BACKGROUND: Wellness initiatives implemented by graduate medical education programs can help mitigate burnout in resident physicians. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review seeks to identify factors that impact the effectiveness of resident wellness interventions and to provide a conceptual framework to guide future interventions. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 6 electronic databases were searched in November 2019 using variations of the keywords "resident physicians," "wellness," and "intervention." Peer-reviewed full-text English-language articles on controlled studies were considered for inclusion. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. RESULTS: The initial search disclosed 1196 articles, of which 18 studies enrolling 666 resident physicians met inclusion criteria for qualitative review. Interventions using peer support and individual meditation enhanced well-being. Effective wellness interventions also used educational theory to guide program development, surveyed participants to guide intervention design, incorporated programming into existing didactic curricula, and recruited voluntary participants. The quality of most of the included studies was poor (13 of 18, 72%) and could be improved by using standardized wellness assessments supported by validity evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that future resident wellness initiatives should focus on grounding interventions in educational theory, forging consensus on wellness instruments with validity evidence, and examining the impact of initiatives on patient outcomes. A logic model can provide a framework for designing and implementing effective wellness interventions.
BACKGROUND: Wellness initiatives implemented by graduate medical education programs can help mitigate burnout in resident physicians. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review seeks to identify factors that impact the effectiveness of resident wellness interventions and to provide a conceptual framework to guide future interventions. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 6 electronic databases were searched in November 2019 using variations of the keywords "resident physicians," "wellness," and "intervention." Peer-reviewed full-text English-language articles on controlled studies were considered for inclusion. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. RESULTS: The initial search disclosed 1196 articles, of which 18 studies enrolling 666 resident physicians met inclusion criteria for qualitative review. Interventions using peer support and individual meditation enhanced well-being. Effective wellness interventions also used educational theory to guide program development, surveyed participants to guide intervention design, incorporated programming into existing didactic curricula, and recruited voluntary participants. The quality of most of the included studies was poor (13 of 18, 72%) and could be improved by using standardized wellness assessments supported by validity evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that future resident wellness initiatives should focus on grounding interventions in educational theory, forging consensus on wellness instruments with validity evidence, and examining the impact of initiatives on patient outcomes. A logic model can provide a framework for designing and implementing effective wellness interventions.
Authors: Jay M Milstein; Bonnie J Raingruber; Stephen H Bennett; Alexander A Kon; Cynthia A Winn; Debora A Paterniti Journal: Med Teach Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone Journal: Surgery Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Malcolm Forbes; Lisa Byrom; Ira van der Steenstraten; Alex Markwell; Holly Bretherton; Margaret Kay Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 2.048
Authors: Liselotte N Dyrbye; Sara E Burke; Rachel R Hardeman; Jeph Herrin; Natalie M Wittlin; Mark Yeazel; John F Dovidio; Brooke Cunningham; Richard O White; Sean M Phelan; Daniel V Satele; Tait D Shanafelt; Michelle van Ryn Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Patrick D Kelly; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Steven G Roth; Scott L Zuckerman; Rohan V Chitale; John C Wellons; Lola B Chambless Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Amy H J Wolfe; Pamela S Hinds; Adre J du Plessis; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Robert M Arnold; Lamia Soghier Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2022-06-30