Literature DB >> 33680083

Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey.

Peter Zaki1,2,3, Junjia Zhu4, Heath B Mackley1, Jennifer C Rosenberg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The human embryo or foetus is susceptible to harmful effects of radiation, which include growth delay, malformations, impaired cognitive function, cancer and foetal demise. The purpose of this study is to describe pregnancy screening practices in radiation oncology, so that potential health effects may be avoided and areas of prevention may be identified.
METHODS: An electronic survey was delivered to 6,304 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the world. Chi-square tests and a multiple logistic regression model were used to analyse the data. All tests were two-sided and the statistical significance level used was 0.05. This study (STUDY00009765) was approved by an Institutional Review Board.
RESULTS: A total of 434 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these respondents, 69.1% were practicing in the United States. Of all respondents, 19.8% reported treating paediatric patients and 93.6% reported treating premenopausal patients. Despite 84.8% of radiation oncologists saying they would 'strongly agree' or 'agree' that one should screen for pregnancy prior to radiation therapy, 29.7% of respondents reported their department has no screening policy and 7.1% of respondents reported they do not screen for pregnancy. Having a departmental policy was associated with screening for pregnancy (p-value = 0.0005).Of all respondents, 93 reported treating a known pregnant patient. Of these 93 respondents, 76 reported intentionally treating and 17 reported accidentally treating a pregnant patient. Respondents who did not screen at time of simulation were significantly more likely to treat a pregnant patient than those who screened at time of simulation (p-value = 0.0459).
CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity exists among practicing radiation oncologists regarding pregnancy screening. Institutional policies should be clear and consistent. All members of the radiation oncology team should make every effort to minimise unintended radiation exposure to the embryo or foetus. © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASTRO; embryo; foetus; policy; survey

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680083      PMCID: PMC7929765          DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience        ISSN: 1754-6605


  36 in total

1.  Preoperative pregnancy testing: "justice and testing for all".

Authors:  R S Twersky; G Singleton
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Preoperative pregnancy testing in adolescents.

Authors:  F J Azzam; G S Padda; J W DeBoard; J L Krock; S M Kolterman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Ionizing radiation and the developing brain.

Authors:  W J Schull; S Norton; R P Jensh
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 4.  Safety of radiographic imaging during pregnancy.

Authors:  K S Toppenberg; D A Hill; D P Miller
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 5.  Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36.

Authors:  M Stovall; C R Blackwell; J Cundiff; D H Novack; J R Palta; L K Wagner; E W Webster; R J Shalek
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Risk coefficients for childhood cancer after intrauterine irradiation: a review.

Authors:  R Wakeford; M P Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  A longitudinal study of growth and development of stature among prenatally exposed atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  M Otake; Y Fujikoshi; W J Schull; S Izumi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Preoperative pregnancy testing in ambulatory surgery. Incidence and impact of positive results.

Authors:  S Manley; G de Kelaita; N J Joseph; M R Salem; H J Heyman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  US radiation oncology practice patterns for posttreatment survivor care.

Authors:  Bridget F Koontz; Rashmi Benda; Jennifer De Los Santos; Karen E Hoffman; M Saiful Huq; Rosalyn Morrell; Amber Sims; Stephanie Stevens; James B Yu; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 10.  The future of Radiation Oncology: Considerations of Young Medical Doctor.

Authors:  Bartosz Urbański
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.