Sonny S Patel1, Rebecca K Webster2, Neil Greenberg3, Dale Weston4, Samantha K Brooks3. 1. Fellow, NIH Global Health Scholar, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK. 3. Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre and NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK. 4. Behavioural Science Team, Emergency Response Department Science & Technology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Research fatigue occurs when an individual or population of interest tires of engaging with research, consequently avoiding further participation. This paper considers research fatigue in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, to identify contributory factors and possible solutions for future post-disaster research. METHODOLOGY: We draw on examples from the literature and our own observations from the recruitment and data collection phases of qualitative and quantitative studies, to provide an overview of possible research fatigue in the current COVID-19 pandemic, with implications for future post-disaster research. FINDINGS: People affected by disasters sometimes receive multiple requests for study participation by separate teams who may not necessarily be coordinating their work. Not keeping participants informed of the research process or outcomes can lead to disillusionment. Being overburdened with too many research requests and failing to see any subsequent changes following participation may cause individuals to experience research fatigue. ORIGINALITY: Guidelines for researchers wishing to reduce the occurrence of research fatigue include ensuring greater transparency within research; sharing of results; and using oversight or gatekeeper bodies to aid coordination. Failure to restrict the number of times that people are asked to participate in studies risks poor participation rates. This can subsequently affect the quality of information with which to inform policy-makers and protect the health of the public during the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health disasters/emergencies.
PURPOSE: Research fatigue occurs when an individual or population of interest tires of engaging with research, consequently avoiding further participation. This paper considers research fatigue in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, to identify contributory factors and possible solutions for future post-disaster research. METHODOLOGY: We draw on examples from the literature and our own observations from the recruitment and data collection phases of qualitative and quantitative studies, to provide an overview of possible research fatigue in the current COVID-19 pandemic, with implications for future post-disaster research. FINDINGS: People affected by disasters sometimes receive multiple requests for study participation by separate teams who may not necessarily be coordinating their work. Not keeping participants informed of the research process or outcomes can lead to disillusionment. Being overburdened with too many research requests and failing to see any subsequent changes following participation may cause individuals to experience research fatigue. ORIGINALITY: Guidelines for researchers wishing to reduce the occurrence of research fatigue include ensuring greater transparency within research; sharing of results; and using oversight or gatekeeper bodies to aid coordination. Failure to restrict the number of times that people are asked to participate in studies risks poor participation rates. This can subsequently affect the quality of information with which to inform policy-makers and protect the health of the public during the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health disasters/emergencies.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Disaster research; Flooding; Pandemic; Research fatigue; Willingness to participate; disaster policy; research methods
Authors: Nina H Gobat; Micaela Gal; Christopher C Butler; Steve A R Webb; Nicholas A Francis; Helen Stanton; Sibyl Anthierens; Hilde Bastiaens; Maciek Godycki-Ćwirko; Anna Kowalczyk; Mariona Pons-Vigués; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera; Anna Berenguera; Angela Watkins; Prasanth Sukumar; Ronald G Moore; Kerenza Hood; Alistair Nichol Journal: Health Expect Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Tanja Moilanen; Mari Sivonen; Kirsi Hipp; Hanna Kallio; Oili Papinaho; Minna Stolt; Riitta Turjamaa; Arja Häggman-Laitila; Mari Kangasniemi Journal: Glob Qual Nurs Res Date: 2022-07-07
Authors: Joan P Packenham; Richard Rosselli; Alice Fothergill; Julia Slutsman; Steve Ramsey; Janet E Hall; Aubrey Miller Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2021-05-11
Authors: Manraj N Kaur; Richard L Skolasky; Philip A Powell; Feng Xie; I-Chan Huang; Ayse Kuspinar; John L O'Dwyer; Amy M Cizik; Donna Rowen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 3.440