Literature DB >> 33678239

Impact and cost-effectiveness of strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination: A model-based analysis.

Allison Portnoy1, Kine Pedersen2, Lill Trogstad3, Bo T Hansen4, Berit Feiring3, Ida Laake3, Megan A Smith5, Stephen Sy6, Mari Nygård4, Jane J Kim6, Emily A Burger7.   

Abstract

Following the global call for action by the World Health Organization to eliminate cervical cancer (CC), we evaluated how each CC policy decision in Norway influenced the timing of CC elimination, and whether introducing nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine would accelerate elimination timing and be cost-effective. We used a multi-modeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the CC incidence associated with six past and future CC prevention policy decisions compared with a pre-vaccination scenario involving 3-yearly cytology-based screening. Scenarios examined the introduction of routine HPV vaccination of 12-year-old girls with quadrivalent vaccine in 2009, a temporary catch-up program for females aged up to 26 years in 2016-2018 with bivalent vaccine, the universal switch to bivalent vaccine in 2017, expansion to include 12-year-old boys in 2018, the switch from cytology- to HPV-based screening for women aged 34-69 in 2020, and the potential switch to nonavalent vaccine in 2021. Introducing routine female vaccination in 2009 enabled elimination to be achieved by 2056 and prevented 17,300 cases. Cumulatively, subsequent policy decisions accelerated elimination to 2039. According to our modeling assumptions, switching to the nonavalent vaccine would not be considered 'good value for money' at relevant cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway unless the incremental cost was $19 per dose or less (range: $17-24) compared to the bivalent vaccine. CC control policies implemented over the last decade in Norway may have accelerated the timeframe to elimination by more than 17 years and prevented over 23,800 cases by 2110.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Screening; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33678239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  2 in total

1.  Impact of disruptions and recovery for established cervical screening programs across a range of high-income country program designs, using COVID-19 as an example: A modelled analysis.

Authors:  Megan A Smith; Emily A Burger; Alejandra Castanon; Inge M C M de Kok; Sharon J B Hanley; Matejka Rebolj; Michaela T Hall; Erik E L Jansen; James Killen; Xavier O'Farrell; Jane J Kim; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 4.637

2.  Impact of Delaying Effective and Cost-Effective Policy Decisions: An Example From Cervical Cancer Prevention in Norway.

Authors:  Allison Portnoy; Mari Nygård; Lill Trogstad; Jane J Kim; Emily A Burger
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2022-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.