Literature DB >> 34029578

Impact of disruptions and recovery for established cervical screening programs across a range of high-income country program designs, using COVID-19 as an example: A modelled analysis.

Megan A Smith1, Emily A Burger2, Alejandra Castanon3, Inge M C M de Kok4, Sharon J B Hanley5, Matejka Rebolj6, Michaela T Hall7, Erik E L Jansen8, James Killen9, Xavier O'Farrell10, Jane J Kim11, Karen Canfell12.   

Abstract

COVID-19 has disrupted cervical screening in several countries, due to a range of policy-, health-service and participant-related factors. Using three well-established models of cervical cancer natural history adapted to simulate screening across four countries, we compared the impact of a range of standardised screening disruption scenarios in four countries that vary in their cervical cancer prevention programs. All scenarios assumed a 6- or 12-month disruption followed by a rapid catch-up of missed screens. Cervical screening disruptions could increase cervical cancer cases by up to 5-6%. In all settings, more than 60% of the excess cancer burden due to disruptions are likely to have occurred in women aged less than 50 years in 2020, including settings where women in their 30s have previously been offered HPV vaccination. Approximately 15-30% of cancers predicted to result from disruptions could be prevented by maintaining colposcopy and precancer treatment services during any disruption period. Disruptions to primary screening had greater adverse effects in situations where women due to attend for screening in 2020 had cytology (vs. HPV) as their previous primary test. Rapid catch-up would dramatically increase demand for HPV tests in 2021, which it may not be feasible to meet because of competing demands on the testing machines and reagents due to COVID tests. These findings can inform future prioritisation strategies for catch-up that balance potential constraints on resourcing with clinical need.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; Cervical screening; Coronavirus; Modelling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34029578      PMCID: PMC9433770          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.637


  46 in total

1.  National and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13 through 17 years--United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Cost-effectiveness of the next generation nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the context of primary human papillomavirus screening in Australia: a comparative modelling analysis.

Authors:  Kate T Simms; Jean-François Laprise; Megan A Smith; Jie-Bin Lew; Michael Caruana; Marc Brisson; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2016-11-29

3.  The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study.

Authors:  Michaela T Hall; Kate T Simms; Jie-Bin Lew; Megan A Smith; Julia Ml Brotherton; Marion Saville; Ian H Frazer; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.

Authors:  E A Burger; J D Ortendahl; S Sy; I S Kristiansen; J J Kim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Impact of COVID-19-related care disruptions on cervical cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Emily A Burger; Erik El Jansen; James Killen; Inge McM de Kok; Megan A Smith; Stephen Sy; Niels Dunnewind; Nicole G Campos; Jennifer S Haas; Sarah Kobrin; Aruna Kamineni; Karen Canfell; Jane J Kim
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 1.687

6.  Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Sara B Smith; Sarah Temin; Farhana Sultana; Philip Castle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-05

7.  An inverse stage-shift model to estimate the excess mortality and health economic impact of delayed access to cancer services due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Koen Degeling; Nancy N Baxter; Jon Emery; Mark A Jenkins; Fanny Franchini; Peter Gibbs; G Bruce Mann; Grant McArthur; Benjamin J Solomon; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.926

8.  National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years--United States, 2014.

Authors:  Sarah Reagan-Steiner; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; Laurie D Elam-Evans; James A Singleton; C Robinette Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Lauri E Markowitz; Shannon Stokley
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  The health impact of human papillomavirus vaccination in the situation of primary human papillomavirus screening: A mathematical modeling study.

Authors:  Suzette M Matthijsse; Steffie K Naber; Jan A C Hontelez; Roel Bakker; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Inge M C M de Kok; Harry J de Koning; Joost van Rosmalen; Sake J de Vlas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Cervical screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: optimising recovery strategies.

Authors:  Alejandra Castanon; Matejka Rebolj; Emily Annika Burger; Inge M C M de Kok; Megan A Smith; Sharon J B Hanley; Francesca Maria Carozzi; Stuart Peacock; James F O'Mahony
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2021-04-30
View more
  14 in total

1.  Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Aruna Kamineni; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Brian Hixon; Sarah C Kobrin; Christopher I Li; Malia Oliver; Katharine A Rendle; Celette Sugg Skinner; Kaitlin Todd; Yingye Zheng; Rebecca A Ziebell; Erica S Breslau; Jessica Chubak; Douglas A Corley; Robert T Greenlee; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Stacey Honda; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Debra P Ritzwoller; Joanne E Schottinger; Jasmin A Tiro; Anil Vachani; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Impact of COVID-19 in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening and Systemic Treatment in São Paulo, Brazil: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Mateus B O Duarte; Juliana L P Argenton; José B C Carvalheira
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-06

3.  COVID-19 and Cancer Global Modelling Consortium (CCGMC): A global reference to inform national recovery strategies.

Authors:  Isabelle Soerjomataram; Freddie Bray; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ophira Ginsburg; Rami Rahal; Richard Sullivan; Karen Canfell
Journal:  J Cancer Policy       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  COVID-19 Pandemic Effects on Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Management: A Population-Based Study in Romania.

Authors:  Alin Popescu; Marius Craina; Stelian Pantea; Catalin Pirvu; Veronica Daniela Chiriac; Iosif Marincu; Felix Bratosin; Iulia Bogdan; Samer Hosin; Cosmin Citu; Elena Bernad; Radu Neamtu; Catalin Dumitru; Adelina Geanina Mocanu; Claudiu Avram; Adrian Gluhovschi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Phone-Based Breasts Self-Examination as an Intervention in Breast Cancer Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Malliga J Subramanian; Rathi Meena Ravi
Journal:  Indian J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10

6.  Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer mortality in Canada.

Authors:  Talía Malagón; Jean H E Yong; Parker Tope; Wilson H Miller; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 7.316

7.  Empowering Patients Through Virtual Care Delivery: Qualitative Study With Micropractice Clinic Patients and Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Lindsay Burton; Kathy L Rush; Mindy A Smith; Selena Davis; Patricia Rodriguez Echeverria; Lina Suazo Hidalgo; Matthias Görges
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-27

8.  COVID-19 disruption to cervical cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Alejandra Castanon; Matejka Rebolj; Francesca Pesola; Philippa Pearmain; Ruth Stubbs
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.687

9.  Health impacts of COVID-19 disruptions to primary cervical screening by time since last screen: A model-based analysis for current and future disruptions.

Authors:  Emily A Burger; Inge M C M de Kok; James F O'Mahony; Matejka Rebolj; Erik E L Jansen; Daniel D de Bondt; James Killen; Sharon J Hanley; Alejandra Castanon; Jane J Kim; Karen Canfell; Megan A Smith; Mary Caroline Regan
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-07-25

10.  Evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening in a central Canadian province.

Authors:  Kathleen M Decker; Allison Feely; Oliver Bucher; Harminder Singh; Donna Turner; Pascal Lambert
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.