Emily B Button1,2, Wai Hang Cheng1,2, Carlos Barron1,2, Honor Cheung1,2, Asma Bashir1,2, Jennifer Cooper1,2, Jasmine Gill1,2, Sophie Stukas1,2, David C Baron1,2, Jerome Robert1,2, Elyn M Rowe1,2, Peter A Cripton3,4, Cheryl L Wellington5,6,7,8. 1. Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. 2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. 3. International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada. 4. School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. 5. Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. wcheryl@mail.ubc.ca. 6. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. wcheryl@mail.ubc.ca. 7. International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada. wcheryl@mail.ubc.ca. 8. School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. wcheryl@mail.ubc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has emerged as a promising fluid biomarker for several neurological indications including traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In humans, serum or plasma GFAP levels can predict brain abnormalities including hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, assays to quantify plasma or serum GFAP in preclinical models are not yet available. METHODS: We developed and validated a novel sensitive GFAP immunoassay assay for mouse plasma on the Meso Scale Discovery immunoassay platform and validated assay performance for robustness, precision, limits of quantification, dilutional linearity, parallelism, recovery, stability, selectivity, and pre-analytical factors. To provide proof-of-concept data for this assay as a translational research tool for TBI and Alzheimer's disease (AD), plasma GFAP was measured in mice exposed to TBI using the Closed Head Impact Model of Engineered Rotational Acceleration (CHIMERA) model and in APP/PS1 mice with normal or reduced levels of plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL). RESULTS: We performed a partial validation of our novel assay and found its performance by the parameters studied was similar to assays used to quantify human GFAP in clinical neurotrauma blood specimens and to assays used to measure murine GFAP in tissues. Specifically, we demonstrated an intra-assay CV of 5.0%, an inter-assay CV of 7.2%, a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 9.0 pg/mL, a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 24.8 pg/mL, an upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) of at least 16,533.9 pg/mL, dilution linearity of calibrators from 20 to 200,000 pg/mL with 90-123% recovery, dilution linearity of plasma specimens up to 32-fold with 96-112% recovery, spike recovery of 67-100%, and excellent analyte stability in specimens exposed to up to 7 freeze-thaw cycles, 168 h at 4 °C, 24 h at room temperature (RT), or 30 days at - 20 °C. We also observed elevated plasma GFAP in mice 6 h after TBI and in aged APP/PS1 mice with plasma HDL deficiency. This assay also detects GFAP in serum. CONCLUSIONS: This novel assay is a valuable translational tool that may help to provide insights into the mechanistic pathophysiology of TBI and AD.
BACKGROUND:Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has emerged as a promising fluid biomarker for several neurological indications including traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In humans, serum or plasma GFAP levels can predict brain abnormalities including hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, assays to quantify plasma or serum GFAP in preclinical models are not yet available. METHODS: We developed and validated a novel sensitive GFAP immunoassay assay for mouse plasma on the Meso Scale Discovery immunoassay platform and validated assay performance for robustness, precision, limits of quantification, dilutional linearity, parallelism, recovery, stability, selectivity, and pre-analytical factors. To provide proof-of-concept data for this assay as a translational research tool for TBI and Alzheimer's disease (AD), plasma GFAP was measured in mice exposed to TBI using the Closed Head Impact Model of Engineered Rotational Acceleration (CHIMERA) model and in APP/PS1mice with normal or reduced levels of plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL). RESULTS: We performed a partial validation of our novel assay and found its performance by the parameters studied was similar to assays used to quantify humanGFAP in clinical neurotrauma blood specimens and to assays used to measure murineGFAP in tissues. Specifically, we demonstrated an intra-assay CV of 5.0%, an inter-assay CV of 7.2%, a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 9.0 pg/mL, a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 24.8 pg/mL, an upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) of at least 16,533.9 pg/mL, dilution linearity of calibrators from 20 to 200,000 pg/mL with 90-123% recovery, dilution linearity of plasma specimens up to 32-fold with 96-112% recovery, spike recovery of 67-100%, and excellent analyte stability in specimens exposed to up to 7 freeze-thaw cycles, 168 h at 4 °C, 24 h at room temperature (RT), or 30 days at - 20 °C. We also observed elevated plasma GFAP in mice 6 h after TBI and in aged APP/PS1mice with plasma HDL deficiency. This assay also detects GFAP in serum. CONCLUSIONS: This novel assay is a valuable translational tool that may help to provide insights into the mechanistic pathophysiology of TBI and AD.
Authors: Monica Garcia-Alloza; Elissa M Robbins; Sandy X Zhang-Nunes; Susan M Purcell; Rebecca A Betensky; Susan Raju; Claudia Prada; Steven M Greenberg; Brian J Bacskai; Matthew P Frosch Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Patrick Oeckl; Steffen Halbgebauer; Sarah Anderl-Straub; Petra Steinacker; André M Huss; Hermann Neugebauer; Christine A F von Arnim; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Timo Grimmer; Johannes Kornhuber; Piotr Lewczuk; Adrian Danek; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Jérôme Robert; Emily B Button; Sophie Stukas; Guilaine K Boyce; Ebrima Gibbs; Catherine M Cowan; Megan Gilmour; Wai Hang Cheng; Sonja K Soo; Brian Yuen; Arvin Bahrabadi; Kevin Kang; Iva Kulic; Gordon Francis; Neil Cashman; Cheryl L Wellington Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 14.195
Authors: Eric Thelin; Faiez Al Nimer; Arvid Frostell; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Harriet Nyström; Mikael Svensson; Bo-Michael Bellander; Fredrik Piehl; David W Nelson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Ulf Andreasson; Armand Perret-Liaudet; Linda J C van Waalwijk van Doorn; Kaj Blennow; Davide Chiasserini; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Tormod Fladby; Sermin Genc; Niels Kruse; H Bea Kuiperij; Luka Kulic; Piotr Lewczuk; Brit Mollenhauer; Barbara Mroczko; Lucilla Parnetti; Eugeen Vanmechelen; Marcel M Verbeek; Bengt Winblad; Henrik Zetterberg; Marleen Koel-Simmelink; Charlotte E Teunissen Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Tien-Phat V Huynh; Chao Wang; Ainsley C Tran; G Travis Tabor; Thomas E Mahan; Caroline M Francis; Mary Beth Finn; Rebecca Spellman; Melissa Manis; Rudolph E Tanzi; Jason D Ulrich; David M Holtzman Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 14.195
Authors: Inge M W Verberk; Elisabeth Thijssen; Jannet Koelewijn; Kimberley Mauroo; Jeroen Vanbrabant; Arno de Wilde; Marissa D Zwan; Sander C J Verfaillie; Rik Ossenkoppele; Frederik Barkhof; Bart N M van Berckel; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier; Erik Stoops; Hugo M Vanderstichele; Charlotte E Teunissen Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 6.982