Literature DB >> 33677705

Is justice grounded? How expertise shapes conceptual representation of institutional concepts.

Caterina Villani1, Stefania D'Ascenzo2, Anna M Borghi3,4, Corrado Roversi5, Mariagrazia Benassi6, Luisa Lugli2.   

Abstract

Using abstract concepts is a hallmark of human cognition. While multiple kinds of abstract concepts exist, they so far have been conceived as a unitary kind in opposition to concrete ones. Here, we focus on Institutional concepts, like justice or norm, investigating their fine-grained differences with respect to other kinds of abstract and concrete concepts, and exploring whether their representation varies according to individual proficiency. Specifically, we asked experts and non-experts in the legal field to evaluate four kinds of concepts (i.e., institutional, theoretical, food, artefact) on 16 dimensions: abstractness-concreteness; imageability; contextual availability; familiarity; age of acquisition; modality of acquisition; social valence; social metacognition; arousal; valence; interoception; metacognition; perceptual modality strength; body-object interaction; mouth and hand involvement. Results showed that Institutional concepts rely more than other categories on linguistic/social and inner experiences and are primarily characterized by positive valence. In addition, a more subtle characterization of the institutional domain emerged: Pure-institutional concepts (e.g., parliament) were perceived as more similar to technical tools, while Meta-institutional concepts (e.g., validity) were characterized mainly by abstract components. Importantly, for what concerns individual proficiency, we found that the level of expertise affects conceptual representation. Only law-experts associated Institutional concepts with exteroceptive and emotional experiences, showing also a more grounded and situated representation of the two types of institutional concepts. Overall, our finding highlights the richness and flexibility of abstract concepts and suggests that they differ in the degree of embodiment and grounding. Implications of the results for current theories of conceptual representation and social institutions are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33677705     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01492-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  40 in total

1.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Capitani; M Laiacona; B Mahon; A Caramazza
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Grounded cognition.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Amy Beth Warriner; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-09

5.  Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns.

Authors:  Stephen D R Bennett; A Nicole Burnett; Paul D Siakaluk; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

6.  Editors' Introduction: Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing, and Modeling.

Authors:  Marianna Bolognesi; Gerard Steen
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 7.  Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Laura Barca; Ferdinand Binkofski; Cristiano Castelfranchi; Giovanni Pezzulo; Luca Tummolini
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Overusing the pacifier during infancy sets a footprint on abstract words processing.

Authors:  Laura Barca; Claudia Mazzuca; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2020-04-29

9.  Grounding Abstractness: Abstract Concepts and the Activation of the Mouth.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Edoardo Zarcone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-10

10.  Pacifier Overuse and Conceptual Relations of Abstract and Emotional Concepts.

Authors:  Laura Barca; Claudia Mazzuca; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Abstract concepts: external influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Concrete constraints on abstract concepts-editorial.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Abstract Concepts, Social Interaction, and Beliefs.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Chiara Fini; Claudia Mazzuca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  Ultimate Grounding of Abstract Concepts: A Graded Account.

Authors:  Tim Reinboth; Igor Farkaš
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.