Literature DB >> 33677683

Resource selection and movement by northern bobwhite broods varies with age and explains survival.

Emily A Sinnott1, Mitch D Weegman2, Thomas R Thompson3, Frank R Thompson4.   

Abstract

Resource selection is a dynamic process driven by habitat valuation and risk avoidance in heterogeneous landscapes. Resource selection and movement decisions of individuals may be sensitive to intrinsic factors, such as body condition, and variation in these choices may have consequences on subsequent survival. We evaluated northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) brood resource selection patterns to quantify utility of different cover types during the development period using integrated step-selection analysis in a Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework with three brood stages: flightless broods ≤ 14 days old, dependent broods 15-35 days old, and independent broods over 35 days old. Broods showed strongest selection for native grasslands that were burned and grazed at least once in the previous two years, and agricultural fields. Brood mobility improved with age; broods > 35 days old travelled farther on average and took daily steps > 200 m more frequently than younger broods. Young broods ≤ 14 days old did not select for idle native grasslands, while broods > 35 days old did select for that cover type. Young broods also selected areas farther from trees compared to older broods. We evaluated the survival consequences of resource selection by comparing patterns in choices of broods that succeeded to choices of broods that failed to survive to 35 days. Successful broods chose habitats with more shrub cover and areas farther from trees compared to failed broods. Our results suggest that conservation planning should consider age-specific patterns in habitat use and demographic consequences of habitat choice for greatest effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brood movement; Habitat management; Integrated step-selection analysis; Native grasslands; Resource selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33677683     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04893-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Multi-scale habitat selection affects offspring survival in a precocial species.

Authors:  P M Bloom; R G Clark; D W Howerter; L M Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies.

Authors:  Thierry Duchesne; Daniel Fortin; Nicolas Courbin
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis.

Authors:  James D Forester; Hae Kyung Im; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes.

Authors:  S L Lima; P A Zollner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Habitat selection and the perceptual trap.

Authors:  Michael A Patten; Jeffrey F Kelly
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Superpredator proximity and landscape characteristics alters nest site selection and breeding success of a subordinate predator.

Authors:  Fidelis Akunke Atuo; Timothy John O'Connell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals.

Authors:  Cameron S Gillies; Mark Hebblewhite; Scott E Nielsen; Meg A Krawchuk; Cameron L Aldridge; Jacqueline L Frair; D Joanne Saher; Cameron E Stevens; Christopher L Jerde
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Identifying and prioritizing greater sage-grouse nesting and brood-rearing habitat for conservation in human-modified landscapes.

Authors:  Matthew R Dzialak; Chad V Olson; Seth M Harju; Stephen L Webb; James P Mudd; Jeffrey B Winstead; L D Hayden-Wing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation.

Authors:  Henrik Thurfjell; Simone Ciuti; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  Behavioral modifications lead to disparate demographic consequences in two sympatric species.

Authors:  Evan P Tanner; Jeremy P Orange; Craig A Davis; R Dwayne Elmore; Samuel D Fuhlendorf
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.