Literature DB >> 20202010

Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies.

Thierry Duchesne1, Daniel Fortin, Nicolas Courbin.   

Abstract

1. Resource selection functions (RSFs) are becoming a dominant tool in habitat selection studies. RSF coefficients can be estimated with unconditional (standard) and conditional logistic regressions. While the advantage of mixed-effects models is recognized for standard logistic regression, mixed conditional logistic regression remains largely overlooked in ecological studies. 2. We demonstrate the significance of mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. First, we use spatially explicit models to illustrate how mixed-effects RSFs can be useful in the presence of inter-individual heterogeneity in selection and when the assumption of independence from irrelevant alternatives (IIA) is violated. The IIA hypothesis states that the strength of preference for habitat type A over habitat type B does not depend on the other habitat types also available. Secondly, we demonstrate the significance of mixed-effects models to evaluate habitat selection of free-ranging bison Bison bison. 3. When movement rules were homogeneous among individuals and the IIA assumption was respected, fixed-effects RSFs adequately described habitat selection by simulated animals. In situations violating the inter-individual homogeneity and IIA assumptions, however, RSFs were best estimated with mixed-effects regressions, and fixed-effects models could even provide faulty conclusions. 4. Mixed-effects models indicate that bison did not select farmlands, but exhibited strong inter-individual variations in their response to farmlands. Less than half of the bison preferred farmlands over forests. Conversely, the fixed-effect model simply suggested an overall selection for farmlands. 5. Conditional logistic regression is recognized as a powerful approach to evaluate habitat selection when resource availability changes. This regression is increasingly used in ecological studies, but almost exclusively in the context of fixed-effects models. Fitness maximization can imply differences in trade-offs among individuals, which can yield inter-individual differences in selection and lead to departure from IIA. These situations are best modelled with mixed-effects models. Mixed-effects conditional logistic regression should become a valuable tool for ecological research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202010     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  24 in total

1.  Resource selection and movement by northern bobwhite broods varies with age and explains survival.

Authors:  Emily A Sinnott; Mitch D Weegman; Thomas R Thompson; Frank R Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Not accounting for interindividual variability can mask habitat selection patterns: a case study on black bears.

Authors:  Rémi Lesmerises; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Identifying and prioritizing greater sage-grouse nesting and brood-rearing habitat for conservation in human-modified landscapes.

Authors:  Matthew R Dzialak; Chad V Olson; Seth M Harju; Stephen L Webb; James P Mudd; Jeffrey B Winstead; L D Hayden-Wing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

5.  Equivalence between Step Selection Functions and Biased Correlated Random Walks for Statistical Inference on Animal Movement.

Authors:  Thierry Duchesne; Daniel Fortin; Louis-Paul Rivest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation.

Authors:  Henrik Thurfjell; Simone Ciuti; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Disentangling woodland caribou movements in response to clearcuts and roads across temporal scales.

Authors:  David Beauchesne; Jochen Ag Jaeger; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A flexible approach for assessing functional landscape connectivity, with application to greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus).

Authors:  Seth M Harju; Chad V Olson; Matthew R Dzialak; James P Mudd; Jeff B Winstead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Uniting statistical and individual-based approaches for animal movement modelling.

Authors:  Guillaume Latombe; Lael Parrott; Mathieu Basille; Daniel Fortin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Data-driven discovery of the spatial scales of habitat choice by elephants.

Authors:  Andrew F Mashintonio; Stuart L Pimm; Grant M Harris; Rudi J van Aarde; Gareth J Russell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.