Elizabeth Sutton1, Julian Bion2, Russell Mannion3, Janet Willars1, Elizabeth Shaw1, Carolyn Tarrant1. 1. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. 2. Intensive Care Medicine, University Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. J.F.Bion@bham.ac.uk. 3. Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: National standards are commonly used as an improvement strategy in healthcare, but organisations may respond in diverse and sometimes negative ways to external quality demands. This paper describes how a sample of NHS hospital trusts in England responded to the introduction of national standards for 7-day services (7DS), from an organisational behaviour perspective. METHODS: We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with executive/director level and clinical staff, in eight NHS trusts that varied in size, location, and levels of specialist staffing at weekends. We explored approaches to implementing standards locally, and the impact of organisational culture and local context on organisational response. RESULTS: Senior staff in the majority of trusts described a focus on hitting targets and achieving compliance with the standards. Compliance-based responses were associated with a hierarchical organisational culture and focus on external performance. In a minority of trusts senior staff described mobilising commitment-based strategies. In these trusts senior staff reframed the external standards in terms of organisational values, and used co-operative strategies for achieving change. Trusts that took a commitment-based approach tended to be described as having a developmental organisational culture and a history of higher performance across the board. Audit data on 7DS showed improvement against standards for most trusts, but commitment-focused trusts were less likely to demonstrate improvements on the 7DS audit. The ability of trusts to respond to external standards was limited when they were under pressure due to a history of overall poor performance or resource limitations. CONCLUSIONS: National standards and audit for service-level improvement generate different types of response in different local settings. Approaches to driving improvement nationally need to be accompanied by resources and tailored support for improvement, taking into account local context and organisational culture.
BACKGROUND: National standards are commonly used as an improvement strategy in healthcare, but organisations may respond in diverse and sometimes negative ways to external quality demands. This paper describes how a sample of NHS hospital trusts in England responded to the introduction of national standards for 7-day services (7DS), from an organisational behaviour perspective. METHODS: We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with executive/director level and clinical staff, in eight NHS trusts that varied in size, location, and levels of specialist staffing at weekends. We explored approaches to implementing standards locally, and the impact of organisational culture and local context on organisational response. RESULTS: Senior staff in the majority of trusts described a focus on hitting targets and achieving compliance with the standards. Compliance-based responses were associated with a hierarchical organisational culture and focus on external performance. In a minority of trusts senior staff described mobilising commitment-based strategies. In these trusts senior staff reframed the external standards in terms of organisational values, and used co-operative strategies for achieving change. Trusts that took a commitment-based approach tended to be described as having a developmental organisational culture and a history of higher performance across the board. Audit data on 7DS showed improvement against standards for most trusts, but commitment-focused trusts were less likely to demonstrate improvements on the 7DS audit. The ability of trusts to respond to external standards was limited when they were under pressure due to a history of overall poor performance or resource limitations. CONCLUSIONS: National standards and audit for service-level improvement generate different types of response in different local settings. Approaches to driving improvement nationally need to be accompanied by resources and tailored support for improvement, taking into account local context and organisational culture.
Entities:
Keywords:
Healthcare quality improvement; Organisational culture; Qualitative research
Authors: Emma-Louise Aveling; Graham Martin; Senai Jiménez García; Lisa Martin; Georgia Herbert; Natalie Armstrong; Mary Dixon-Woods; Ian Woolhouse Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Susan Burnett; Peter Mendel; Francisco Nunes; Siri Wiig; Hester van den Bovenkamp; Anette Karltun; Glenn Robert; Janet Anderson; Charles Vincent; Naomi Fulop Journal: J Health Serv Res Policy Date: 2015-12-17
Authors: Cassie Aldridge; Julian Bion; Amunpreet Boyal; Yen-Fu Chen; Mike Clancy; Tim Evans; Alan Girling; Joanne Lord; Russell Mannion; Peter Rees; Chris Roseveare; Gavin Rudge; Jianxia Sun; Carolyn Tarrant; Mark Temple; Sam Watson; Richard Lilford Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lorelei Jones; Linda Pomeroy; Glenn Robert; Susan Burnett; Janet E Anderson; Stephen Morris; Estela Capelas Barbosa; Naomi J Fulop Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 7.035