Literature DB >> 33676483

Evaluation of an occipito-cervico fusion with a new implant design: a biomechanical study.

Filippo Migliorini1, Alice Baroncini2, Yasser El Mansy3, Valentin Quack3, Andreas Prescher4, Max Mischer2, Johannes Greven3, Markus Tingart2, Jörg Eschweiler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A novel implant for occipitocervical fusion consisting of a median plate with an additional hook inserting in the foramen magnum was tested. Aim of this study was to test the stability of a new implant for occipitocervical fusion against the already available and employed median plate implant without hook. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: 36 rigid polyurethane foams occipital artificial bones were used. The two occipital implants, namely the occipital plate with hook (Group 1) and the one without hook (Group 2), were applied to the artificial occiput trough three occipital screws and ensured into the experimental setup trough a crossbar. The test parameters were set using the testing machine software as follows: (1) test speed: 10 mm/ min, with 25 mm/ min maximum; (2) preload: 5 N; (3) force switch-off threshold: 90% force drop from F_max. Failure force and path were recorded. Failure force is defined as the maximum reaction force under which failure occurs (F_max), while failure path is the travel path during which failure occurs (dL).
RESULTS: Group 1 (plate with hook) showed a mean failure force of 459.3 ± 35.9 N and a mean failure path of 5.8 ± 0.3 mm Group 2 (plate without hook) showed a mean failure force of 323.9 ± 20.2 N and a mean failure path of 7.2 ± 0.4 mm. The Shapiro-Wilk test score was not significant (P >  0.1), assuming that data were normally distributed. Group 1 had a statistically significant greater F_max (+ 135.37; P >  0.0001) and less dL (- 1.52; P > 0.0001) compared to group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Medial plates with foramen magnum hooks showed to be more stable that plates without a hook. These new implants may represent a new tool in OCJ fixation, but further studies are required to investigate their behavior in an anatomical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33676483      PMCID: PMC7937312          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04112-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  23 in total

1.  Posterior occipitocervical fusion in rheumatoid arthritis and other instabilities.

Authors:  D Grob
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  The concept of locking plates.

Authors:  P Cronier; G Pietu; C Dujardin; N Bigorre; F Ducellier; R Gerard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of parasagittal occipital plating: screw load sharing analysis.

Authors:  Todd J Frush; Theodore J Fisher; Scott C Ensminger; Eeric Truumees; Constantine K Demetropoulos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Occipitocervical Fusion: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Nabeel S Ashafai; Massimiliano Visocchi; Norbert Wąsik
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2019

5.  Occipitocervical fixation using occipital bone hooks and cervical lateral mass screws: analysis of 16 cases.

Authors:  Atilla Akbay; Ilkay Isikay; Merdan Orunoglu
Journal:  Turk Neurosurg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.003

6.  Should we recommend occipital plate fixation using bicortical screws or inverted occipital hooks to optimize occipito-cervical junction fusion? A biomechanical study combining an experimental and analytical approach.

Authors:  Arnaud Germaneau; Tanguy Vendeuvre; Alexandre Delmotte; Samuel D'Houtaud; Cyril Brèque; Louis Petureau; Pascal Doumalin; Jean-Christophe Dupré; Fabrice Brémand; Philippe Maxy; Jean-Pierre Richer; Philippe Rigoard
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Biomechanical analysis of occipitocervical stability afforded by three fixation techniques.

Authors:  Melvin D Helgeson; Ronald A Lehman; Rick C Sasso; Anton E Dmitriev; Andrew W Mack; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  A biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervical instrumentation: screw compared with wire fixation.

Authors:  R J Hurlbert; N R Crawford; W G Choi; C A Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  A novel cadaver-based educational program in general surgery training.

Authors:  Catherine E Lewis; Warwick J Peacock; Areti Tillou; O Joe Hines; Jonathan R Hiatt
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Stability of supramalleolar osteotomies using different implants in a sawbone model.

Authors:  Sarah Ettinger; Michael Schwarze; Daiwei Yao; Max Ettinger; Leif Claassen; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Hajo Thermann; Christian Plaass
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.