Literature DB >> 33675838

Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.

Conor H Murray1, Jingfei Li1, Jessica Weafer1, Harriet de Wit2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is commonly believed that drugs, including stimulants, are used recreationally because of their ability to induce pleasurable subjective effects. However, recreational drug use sometimes occurs in the absence of positive subjective effects, suggesting that other factors contribute. Here, we examine the extent to which the direct subjective effects of amphetamine, a commonly misused stimulant, predict subsequent choice of the drug vs placebo.
METHODS: Healthy adults (N = 112) participated in a five-session amphetamine choice study. On the first four sessions, participants sampled either 20 mg d-amphetamine or placebo in color-coded capsules two times each. On the fifth session, they chose which color (d-amphetamine or placebo) they preferred. We examined the choice of drug vs placebo in relation to demographic characteristics, baseline mood states, personality and subjective and cardiovascular responses to acute administration of the drug.
RESULTS: Eighty-one participants chose amphetamine (Choosers) while 31 chose placebo (Non-choosers). Overall, amphetamine produced typical stimulant-like effects on subjective questionnaires, and it elevated heart rate and blood pressure vs placebo. Choosers reported greater positive mood, elation and stimulant-like effects following amphetamine compared to Non-choosers. The Choosers also exhibited a greater increase in systolic blood pressure, but not heart rate. The groups did not differ on demographic characteristics, mood states before drug administration or personality.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the idea that pleasurable subjective responses to amphetamine, including positive mood, elation, and stimulant-like effects influence behavioral choice of the drug.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphetamine; Choice; Drug; Healthy volunteer; Mood; Subjective effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675838      PMCID: PMC8018542          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  42 in total

Review 1.  Initial tobacco use episodes in children and adolescents: current knowledge, future directions.

Authors:  T Eissenberg; R L Balster
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  History of childhood adversity is positively associated with ventral striatal dopamine responses to amphetamine.

Authors:  Lynn M Oswald; Gary S Wand; Hiroto Kuwabara; Dean F Wong; Shijun Zhu; James R Brasic
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Factors influencing the reinforcing and subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  L.D. Chait
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 6.  Principles of laboratory assessment of drug abuse liability and implications for clinical development.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Amphetamine-induced place preference in humans.

Authors:  Emma Childs; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Associations between sensation seeking and d-amphetamine reinforcement.

Authors:  Mollie E Miller; Gary J Badger; Sarah H Heil; Stephen T Higgins; Stacey C Sigmon
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2015-04-06

9.  Genome-wide association study of d-amphetamine response in healthy volunteers identifies putative associations, including cadherin 13 (CDH13).

Authors:  Amy B Hart; Barbara E Engelhardt; Margaret C Wardle; Greta Sokoloff; Matthew Stephens; Harriet de Wit; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Amphetamine fails to alter cued recollection of emotional images: study of encoding, retrieval, and state-dependency.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; David A Gallo; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.