Literature DB >> 33675516

Feasibility of combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy with electroencephalography to identify chronic stroke responders to cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation-a computational modeling and portable neuroimaging methodological study.

Zeynab Rezaee1, Shashi Ranjan2, Dhaval Solanki2, Mahasweta Bhattacharya1, M V Padma Srivastava3, Uttama Lahiri2, Anirban Dutta4.   

Abstract

Feasibility of portable neuroimaging of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) effects on the cerebral cortex has not been investigated vis-à-vis cerebellar lobular electric field strength. We studied functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in conjunction with electroencephalography (EEG) to measure changes in the brain activation at the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) following ctDCS as well as virtual reality-based balance training (VBaT) before and after ctDCS treatment in 12 hemiparetic chronic stroke survivors. We performed general linear modeling (GLM) that putatively associated the lobular electric field strength with the changes in the fNIRS-EEG measures at the ipsilesional and contra-lesional PFC and SMC. Here, fNIRS-EEG measures were found in the latent space from canonical correlation analysis (CCA) between the changes in total hemoglobin (tHb) concentrations (0.01-0.07Hz and 0.07-0.13Hz bands) and log10-transformed EEG bandpower within 1-45 Hz where significant (Wilks' lambda>0.95) canonical correlations were found only for the 0.07-0.13-Hz band. Also, the first principal component (97.5% variance accounted for) of the mean lobular electric field strength was a good predictor of the latent variables of oxy-hemoglobin (O2Hb) concentrations and log10-transformed EEG bandpower. GLM also provided insights into non-responders to ctDCS who also performed poorly in the VBaT due to ideomotor apraxia. Future studies should investigate fNIRS-EEG joint-imaging in a larger cohort to identify non-responders based on GLM fitting to the fNIRS-EEG data.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellum; EEG; Postural balance; Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; fNIRS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675516     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01249-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  58 in total

Review 1.  Neurovascular coupling in the normal brain and in hypertension, stroke, and Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Helene Girouard; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-01

2.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  EEG-NIRS based assessment of neurovascular coupling during anodal transcranial direct current stimulation--a stroke case series.

Authors:  Anirban Dutta; Athira Jacob; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury; Abhijit Das; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  A hybrid NIRS-EEG system for self-paced brain computer interface with online motor imagery.

Authors:  Bonkon Koo; Hwan-Gon Lee; Yunjun Nam; Hyohyeong Kang; Chin Su Koh; Hyung-Cheul Shin; Seungjin Choi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Katherine Dyke; Soyoung Kim; Georgina M Jackson; Stephen R Jackson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Michael A Nitsche; Nadia Bolognini; Marom Bikson; Tim Wagner; Lotfi Merabet; Dylan J Edwards; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: Moving Towards Clinical Applications for Cerebellar and Extra-Cerebellar Disorders.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Effect of Cerebellar Stimulation on Gait and Balance Recovery in Patients With Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Sonia Bonnì; Elias Paolo Casula; Marco Iosa; Stefano Paolucci; Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Alex Martino Cinnera; Viviana Ponzo; Michele Maiella; Silvia Picazio; Fabrizio Sallustio; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 18.302

9.  Short-Term Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Standing Balance Performance in Patients with Chronic Stroke and Healthy Age-Matched Elderly.

Authors:  Sarah B Zandvliet; Carel G M Meskers; Gert Kwakkel; Erwin E H van Wegen
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation plus tracking training therapy in people with stroke: an open-label feasibility study.

Authors:  Ann Van de Winckel; James R Carey; Teresa A Bisson; Elsa C Hauschildt; Christopher D Streib; William K Durfee
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Li Hong-Yu; Zhang Zhi-Jie; Li Juan; Xiong Ting; He Wei-Chun; Zhu Ning
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.648

2.  Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Portable Neuroimaging-Guided Noninvasive Brain Stimulation of the Cortico-Cerebello-Thalamo-Cortical Loop-Hypothesis and Theory in Cannabis Use Disorder.

Authors:  Pushpinder Walia; Abhishek Ghosh; Shubhmohan Singh; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 4.  Applications of open-source software ROAST in clinical studies: A review.

Authors:  Mohigul Nasimova; Yu Huang
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 9.184

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for gait recovery following stroke: A systematic review of current literature and beyond.

Authors:  Xavier Corominas-Teruel; Rosa María San Segundo Mozo; Montserrat Fibla Simó; Maria Teresa Colomina Fosch; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.086

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.