Li Hong-Yu1, Zhang Zhi-Jie2, Li Juan3, Xiong Ting3, He Wei-Chun3, Zhu Ning3. 1. General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750003, China. 792292024@qq.com. 2. Yinchuan Stomatology Hospital, Yinchuan, 750002, China. 3. General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750003, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cerebellum is involved in regulating motor, affective, and cognitive processes. It is a promising target for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention in stroke. OBJECTIVES: To review the current evidence for cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) in stroke, its problems, and its future directions. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases. Eligible studies were identified after a systematic literature review of the effects of ctDCS in stroke patients. The changes in assessment scale scores and objective indicators after stimulation were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 169 stroke patients. Current evidence suggests that anode tDCS on the right cerebellar hemisphere does not appear to enhance language processing in stroke patients. Compared with the sham group, stroke patients showed a significant improvement in the verb generation task after cathodal ctDCS stimulation. However, with regard to naming, two studies came to the opposite conclusion. The contralesional anodal ctDCS is expected to improve standing balance but not motor learning in stroke patients. The bipolar bilateral ctDCS protocol to target dentate nuclei (PO10h and PO9h) had a positive effect on standing balance, goal-directed weight shifting, and postural control in stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: ctDCS appears to improve poststroke language and motor dysfunction (particularly gait). However, the evidence for these results was insufficient, and the quality of the relevant studies was low. ctDCS stimulation parameters and individual factors of participants may affect the therapeutic effect of ctDCS. Researchers need to take a more regulated approach in the future to conduct studies with large sample sizes. Overall, ctDCS remains a promising stroke intervention technique that could be used in the future.
BACKGROUND: The cerebellum is involved in regulating motor, affective, and cognitive processes. It is a promising target for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention in stroke. OBJECTIVES: To review the current evidence for cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) in stroke, its problems, and its future directions. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases. Eligible studies were identified after a systematic literature review of the effects of ctDCS in stroke patients. The changes in assessment scale scores and objective indicators after stimulation were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 169 stroke patients. Current evidence suggests that anode tDCS on the right cerebellar hemisphere does not appear to enhance language processing in stroke patients. Compared with the sham group, stroke patients showed a significant improvement in the verb generation task after cathodal ctDCS stimulation. However, with regard to naming, two studies came to the opposite conclusion. The contralesional anodal ctDCS is expected to improve standing balance but not motor learning in stroke patients. The bipolar bilateral ctDCS protocol to target dentate nuclei (PO10h and PO9h) had a positive effect on standing balance, goal-directed weight shifting, and postural control in stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: ctDCS appears to improve poststroke language and motor dysfunction (particularly gait). However, the evidence for these results was insufficient, and the quality of the relevant studies was low. ctDCS stimulation parameters and individual factors of participants may affect the therapeutic effect of ctDCS. Researchers need to take a more regulated approach in the future to conduct studies with large sample sizes. Overall, ctDCS remains a promising stroke intervention technique that could be used in the future.
Authors: Marieke J Begemann; Bodyl A Brand; Branislava Ćurčić-Blake; André Aleman; Iris E Sommer Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Elias Paolo Casula; Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Sonia Bonnì; Barbara Spanò; Viviana Ponzo; Ilenia Salsano; Giovanni Giulietti; Alex Martino Cinnera; Michele Maiella; Ilaria Borghi; Lorenzo Rocchi; Marco Bozzali; Fabrizio Sallustio; Carlo Caltagirone; Giacomo Koch Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 5.038