Literature DB >> 33675408

Lianas do not reduce tree biomass accumulation in young successional tropical dry forests.

Sergio Estrada-Villegas1,2,3, Jefferson S Hall4, Michiel van Breugel4,5,6, Stefan A Schnitzer7,8.   

Abstract

Young successional tropical forests are crucial in the global carbon cycle because they can quickly sequester large quantities of atmospheric carbon. However, lianas (woody vines) can significantly decrease biomass accumulation in young regenerating forests. Lianas are abundant in tropical dry forests, and thus we hypothesized that lianas reduce biomass accretion in dry forests. Lianas may be particularly detrimental to the growth of young trees, which are vulnerable to competition from lianas. Alternatively, lianas may have a stronger negative effect on the largest trees because lianas seek the high-light environment at the top of the forest canopy. We tested these hypotheses using a liana-removal experiment in 13 dry forest stands that ranged from 1 to 70 years in southwestern Panama. We measured biomass accumulation annually for more than 10,000 stems from 2013 to 2017. Contrary to our expectations, liana removal had no effect on tree biomass accumulation across our successional forests and throughout our study period. Liana removal did not benefit smaller trees or larger trees. Lianas did not increase biomass accumulation on recruits, and did not increase biomass loss due to mortality. Surprisingly, removing lianas had a negative effect on three out of 41 tree species. Lianas had no effect on biomass accumulation and loss, possibly because: (1) trees allocated resources to roots instead of stems, (2) trees and lianas partitioned water, (3) higher irradiance after liana removal reduced soil moisture, or (4) low water availability might have been such a strong stressor that it reduced plant-plant competition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass accretion; Biomass loss; Forest regeneration; Removal experiment; Tree size

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675408     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04877-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests.

Authors:  Lourens Poorter; Frans Bongers; T Mitchell Aide; Angélica M Almeyda Zambrano; Patricia Balvanera; Justin M Becknell; Vanessa Boukili; Pedro H S Brancalion; Eben N Broadbent; Robin L Chazdon; Dylan Craven; Jarcilene S de Almeida-Cortez; George A L Cabral; Ben H J de Jong; Julie S Denslow; Daisy H Dent; Saara J DeWalt; Juan M Dupuy; Sandra M Durán; Mario M Espírito-Santo; María C Fandino; Ricardo G César; Jefferson S Hall; José Luis Hernandez-Stefanoni; Catarina C Jakovac; André B Junqueira; Deborah Kennard; Susan G Letcher; Juan-Carlos Licona; Madelon Lohbeck; Erika Marín-Spiotta; Miguel Martínez-Ramos; Paulo Massoca; Jorge A Meave; Rita Mesquita; Francisco Mora; Rodrigo Muñoz; Robert Muscarella; Yule R F Nunes; Susana Ochoa-Gaona; Alexandre A de Oliveira; Edith Orihuela-Belmonte; Marielos Peña-Claros; Eduardo A Pérez-García; Daniel Piotto; Jennifer S Powers; Jorge Rodríguez-Velázquez; I Eunice Romero-Pérez; Jorge Ruíz; Juan G Saldarriaga; Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa; Naomi B Schwartz; Marc K Steininger; Nathan G Swenson; Marisol Toledo; Maria Uriarte; Michiel van Breugel; Hans van der Wal; Maria D M Veloso; Hans F M Vester; Alberto Vicentini; Ima C G Vieira; Tony Vizcarra Bentos; G Bruce Williamson; Danaë M A Rozendaal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.

Authors:  Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.

Authors:  Jerome Chave; David Coomes; Steven Jansen; Simon L Lewis; Nathan G Swenson; Amy E Zanne
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Effects of below- and aboveground competition from the vines Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia on the growth of the tree host Liquidambar styraciflua.

Authors:  L R Dillenburg; D F Whigham; A H Teramura; I N Forseth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Liana effects on biomass dynamics strengthen during secondary forest succession.

Authors:  Hao Ran Lai; Jefferson S Hall; Benjamin L Turner; Michiel van Breugel
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Effect of liana cutting on water potential and growth of adult Senna multijuga (Caesalpinioideae) trees in a Bolivian tropical forest.

Authors:  D R Pérez-Salicrup; M G Barker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The response of lianas to 20 yr of nutrient addition in a Panamanian forest.

Authors:  Stefan A Schnitzer; Sergio Estrada-Villegas; S Joseph Wright
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Comparative water relations of mature mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) trees with and without lianas in a subhumid, seasonally dry forest in Bolivia.

Authors:  Martin G. Barker; Diego Pérez-Salicrup
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Andrzej M Jagodzinski; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Shem Kuyah; Yunjian Luo; Jacek Oleksyn; Vladimir A Usoltsev; Thomas N Buckley; Peter B Reich; Lawren Sack
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics.

Authors:  Robin L Chazdon; Eben N Broadbent; Danaë M A Rozendaal; Frans Bongers; Angélica María Almeyda Zambrano; T Mitchell Aide; Patricia Balvanera; Justin M Becknell; Vanessa Boukili; Pedro H S Brancalion; Dylan Craven; Jarcilene S Almeida-Cortez; George A L Cabral; Ben de Jong; Julie S Denslow; Daisy H Dent; Saara J DeWalt; Juan M Dupuy; Sandra M Durán; Mario M Espírito-Santo; María C Fandino; Ricardo G César; Jefferson S Hall; José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni; Catarina C Jakovac; André B Junqueira; Deborah Kennard; Susan G Letcher; Madelon Lohbeck; Miguel Martínez-Ramos; Paulo Massoca; Jorge A Meave; Rita Mesquita; Francisco Mora; Rodrigo Muñoz; Robert Muscarella; Yule R F Nunes; Susana Ochoa-Gaona; Edith Orihuela-Belmonte; Marielos Peña-Claros; Eduardo A Pérez-García; Daniel Piotto; Jennifer S Powers; Jorge Rodríguez-Velazquez; Isabel Eunice Romero-Pérez; Jorge Ruíz; Juan G Saldarriaga; Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa; Naomi B Schwartz; Marc K Steininger; Nathan G Swenson; Maria Uriarte; Michiel van Breugel; Hans van der Wal; Maria D M Veloso; Hans Vester; Ima Celia G Vieira; Tony Vizcarra Bentos; G Bruce Williamson; Lourens Poorter
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Removing climbers more than doubles tree growth and biomass in degraded tropical forests.

Authors:  Catherine Finlayson; Anand Roopsind; Bronson W Griscom; David P Edwards; Robert P Freckleton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.