| Literature DB >> 26840632 |
Lourens Poorter1, Frans Bongers1, T Mitchell Aide2, Angélica M Almeyda Zambrano3, Patricia Balvanera4, Justin M Becknell5, Vanessa Boukili6, Pedro H S Brancalion7, Eben N Broadbent3, Robin L Chazdon6, Dylan Craven8,9,10, Jarcilene S de Almeida-Cortez11, George A L Cabral11, Ben H J de Jong12, Julie S Denslow13, Daisy H Dent14,15, Saara J DeWalt16, Juan M Dupuy17, Sandra M Durán18, Mario M Espírito-Santo19, María C Fandino20, Ricardo G César7, Jefferson S Hall8, José Luis Hernandez-Stefanoni17, Catarina C Jakovac1,21, André B Junqueira22,23,24, Deborah Kennard25, Susan G Letcher26, Juan-Carlos Licona27, Madelon Lohbeck1,28, Erika Marín-Spiotta29, Miguel Martínez-Ramos4, Paulo Massoca21, Jorge A Meave30, Rita Mesquita21, Francisco Mora4,30, Rodrigo Muñoz30, Robert Muscarella31,32, Yule R F Nunes19, Susana Ochoa-Gaona12, Alexandre A de Oliveira33, Edith Orihuela-Belmonte12, Marielos Peña-Claros1, Eduardo A Pérez-García30, Daniel Piotto34, Jennifer S Powers35,36, Jorge Rodríguez-Velázquez4, I Eunice Romero-Pérez30, Jorge Ruíz37,38, Juan G Saldarriaga, Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa18, Naomi B Schwartz31, Marc K Steininger, Nathan G Swenson39, Marisol Toledo27, Maria Uriarte31, Michiel van Breugel8,40,41, Hans van der Wal42, Maria D M Veloso19, Hans F M Vester43,44, Alberto Vicentini21, Ima C G Vieira45, Tony Vizcarra Bentos21, G Bruce Williamson21,46, Danaë M A Rozendaal1,6,47.
Abstract
Land-use change occurs nowhere more rapidly than in the tropics, where the imbalance between deforestation and forest regrowth has large consequences for the global carbon cycle. However, considerable uncertainty remains about the rate of biomass recovery in secondary forests, and how these rates are influenced by climate, landscape, and prior land use. Here we analyse aboveground biomass recovery during secondary succession in 45 forest sites and about 1,500 forest plots covering the major environmental gradients in the Neotropics. The studied secondary forests are highly productive and resilient. Aboveground biomass recovery after 20 years was on average 122 megagrams per hectare (Mg ha(-1)), corresponding to a net carbon uptake of 3.05 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1), 11 times the uptake rate of old-growth forests. Aboveground biomass stocks took a median time of 66 years to recover to 90% of old-growth values. Aboveground biomass recovery after 20 years varied 11.3-fold (from 20 to 225 Mg ha(-1)) across sites, and this recovery increased with water availability (higher local rainfall and lower climatic water deficit). We present a biomass recovery map of Latin America, which illustrates geographical and climatic variation in carbon sequestration potential during forest regrowth. The map will support policies to minimize forest loss in areas where biomass resilience is naturally low (such as seasonally dry forest regions) and promote forest regeneration and restoration in humid tropical lowland areas with high biomass resilience.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26840632 DOI: 10.1038/nature16512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962