Literature DB >> 20718560

Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.

Irina M Harris1, Claire T Benito, Paul E Dux.   

Abstract

We investigated distractor processing in a dual-target rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task containing familiar objects, by measuring repetition priming from a priming distractor (PD) to Target 2 (T2). Priming from a visually identical PD was contrasted with priming from a PD in a different orientation from T2. We also tested the effect of attention on distractor processing, by placing the PD either within or outside the attentional blink (AB). PDs outside the AB induced positive priming when they were in a different orientation to T2 and no priming, or negative priming, when they were perceptually identical to T2. PDs within the AB induced positive priming regardless of orientation. These findings demonstrate (1) that distractors are processed at multiple levels of representation; (2) that the view-specific representations of distractors are actively suppressed during RSVP; and (3) that this suppression fails in the absence of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20718560     DOI: 10.1037/a0019218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Repetition blindness for words and pictures: A failure to form stable type representations?

Authors:  Irina M Harris; William G Hayward; Manuel S Seet; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-05

2.  Priming the semantic neighbourhood during the attentional blink.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Michael J J Little
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Hannah L Pincham; Dénes Szűcs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Negative priming under rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Kin Fai Ellick Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.